41 et	al.,
  32 Google	Scholar
  27 of	the
  26 CrossRef	Full
  26 Full	Text
  26 Text	|
  26 |	Google
  21 in	the
  19 social	media
  16 Abstract	|
  16 PubMed	Abstract
  16 media	influencers
  16 |	CrossRef
  12 SD	=
  11 M	=
  11 food	marketing
   9 Frequency	of
   9 of	Watching
   9 of	food
   9 of	watching
   9 unhealthy	beverages
   9 watching	vlogs
   8 Unhealthy	Beverages
   8 consumption	of
   8 for	the
   8 vlogs	and
   7 Folkvord	et
   7 Unhealthy	Snacks
   7 Watching	Vlogs
   7 frequency	of
   7 to	the
   6 Buijzen,	M.
   6 al.,	2018).
   6 et	al.
   6 more	traditional
   6 of	unhealthy
   6 such	as
   6 unhealthy	dietary
   5 *	*
   5 Bevelander,	K.
   5 Beverages	Consumption
   5 K.	E.,
   5 University	of
   5 al.,	2016;
   5 al.,	2019).
   5 and	Buijzen,
   5 and	their
   5 beverages	and
   5 effects	of
   5 exposure	to
   5 of	Social
   5 of	social
   5 on	children’s
   5 regression	paths
   5 that	the
   4 Brief	Research
   4 Buijzen,	M.,
   4 Burk,	W.
   4 Consumption	of
   4 Family	Affluence
   4 M.,	and
   4 Research	Report
   4 Research	Topic
   4 Smit,	C.
   4 United	States
   4 W.	J.,
   4 and	the
   4 as	a
   4 between	children’s
   4 can	be
   4 children’s	frequency
   4 dietary	behaviors
   4 dietary	behaviors.
   4 for	food
   4 forms	of
   4 impact	of
   4 marketing	in
   4 on	the
   4 relations	between
   4 the	MyMovez
   4 the	children
   4 the	current
   4 the	impact
   4 the	longitudinal
   4 the	observed
   4 three	waves
   4 to	promote
   4 types	of
   4 waves	of
   4 with	a
   4 with	the
   3 A.,	and
   3 Bevelander	et
   3 Boyland	et
   3 Buijs,	L.,
   3 Buijzen	et
   3 C.	R.,
   3 C.,	and
   3 De	Droog,
   3 Droog	et
   3 Droog,	S.
   3 E.,	Burk,
   3 Front.	Psychol.
   3 Impact	of
   3 It	is
   3 J.,	and
   3 Media	Influencers
   3 Public	Health
   3 Reijmersdal,	E.
   3 Scholar	De
   3 Snacks	Consumption
   3 Social	Media
   3 Suggest	a
   3 T.	J.,
   3 T1:	range
   3 T2:	range
   3 T3:	range
   3 The	analyses
   3 Topic	>
   3 Woudenberg,	T.
   3 a	Research
   3 a	cut-off
   3 about	the
   3 account	for
   3 advertising	exposure
   3 and	Iannotti,
   3 and	Watkins,
   3 and	foods
   3 beverages	2
   3 by	social
   3 children	and
   3 children	were
   3 children’s	self-reported
   3 children’s	unhealthy
   3 conceivable	that
   3 consisted	of
   3 cut-off	value
   3 data	collection
   3 data	from
   3 did	not
   3 food	marketing.
   3 for	Unhealthy
   3 for	example
   3 from	the
   3 good	fit
   3 in	children
   3 in	media
   3 in	this
   3 is	a
   3 is	conceivable
   3 level	of
   3 need	for
   3 of	advertising
   3 of	and
   3 of	data
   3 on	Children’s
   3 on	Unhealthy
   3 on	three
   3 paths	were
   3 platform	for
   3 range	1–6,
   3 showed	that
   3 that	are
   3 that	children
   3 the	European
   3 the	case
   3 the	effects
   3 the	food
   3 the	mechanisms
   3 the	model
   3 the	models
   3 the	study
   3 the	vlogs
   3 their	consumption
   3 there	is
   3 time	of
   3 to	account
   3 used	in
   3 value	of
   3 vlogs	on
   3 with	food
   3 years	later.
   3 1–6,	M
   3 2	years
   3 8-	to
   3 2016;	Folkvord
   3 influencers	to
   2 (Bevelander	et
   2 (Buijzen	et
   2 (De	Droog
   2 (e.g.,	level
   2 (i.e.,	every
   2 +	Author
   2 A	total
   2 A.,	Halford,
   2 A.,	et
   2 All	authors
   2 Author	Contributions
   2 Availability	Statement
   2 Available	at:
   2 BMC	Public
   2 Boyland,	E.
   2 C.	A.,
   2 CFI	=
   2 CS,	and
   2 Children	and
   2 Children’s	Dietary
   2 Conflict	of
   2 Consumption	at
   2 Consumption	over
   2 Consumption,	children
   2 Data	Availability
   2 E.	A.
   2 E.,	and
   2 Ethics	Committee
   2 Ethics	Statement
   2 European	Research
   2 Folkvord,	F.,
   2 H.,	Bevelander,
   2 Halford,	J.
   2 Health	Commun.
   2 Iannotti,	2012;
   2 J.	C.,
   2 J.	Health
   2 J.,	Buijs,
   2 Kelly,	B.,
   2 Knoxville,	United
   2 Leeuw,	R.
   2 Lipsky	and
   2 M.	(2012).
   2 M.	(2016).
   2 M.	A.,
   2 M.,	Buijzen,
   2 Mariea	G.
   2 Materials	and
   2 Michigan	State
   2 Moreover,	the
   2 MyMovez	project
   2 N.	H.,
   2 Netherlands	*
   2 Netherlands,	which
   2 Nijmegen,	Netherlands
   2 Nora	J.
   2 Opree	et
   2 Our	findings
   2 P.	M.
   2 P.,	and
   2 Pearson	et
   2 R.	N.
   2 RMSEA	=
   2 Report	is
   2 Research	Council
   2 Results	for
   2 Rozendaal,	E.,
   2 S.	J.
   2 S.	M.,
   2 Scholar	Buijzen,
   2 Scholar	Folkvord,
   2 Scholar	Smit,
   2 State	University,
   2 Statement	+
   2 States	Reviewed
   2 Structural	path
   2 T1	to
   2 T3.	The
   2 Tennessee,	Knoxville,
   2 The	Impact
   2 The	MyMovez
   2 The	University
   2 The	effect
   2 The	model
   2 The	other
   2 To	assess
   2 University,	United
   2 Valkenburg,	P.
   2 Van	Woudenberg,
   2 Vlogs	and
   2 Vlogs	on
   2 Woudenberg	et
   2 a	good
   2 a	large-scale
   2 a	need
   2 a	randomized
   2 a	relatively
   2 a	self-regulatory
   2 a	systematic
   2 adolescents:	a
   2 advertising	on
   2 advertising,	the
   2 affect	the
   2 aim	of
   2 al.,	2006;
   2 al.,	2008;
   2 al.,	2011),
   2 al.,	2016).
   2 all	regression
   2 among	young
   2 an	attractive
   2 analyses	did
   2 analyses	of
   2 analyzed	the
   2 and	Bentler,
   2 and	Consumption
   2 and	Family
   2 and	Methods
   2 and	Silvera,
   2 and	approved
   2 and	beverage
   2 and	direct
   2 and	eating
   2 and	non-communicable
   2 and	salt
   2 and	secondary
   2 and	snacks.
   2 and	unhealthy
   2 animated	characters
   2 are	high
   2 as	well
   2 assess	Unhealthy
   2 associated	with
   2 associations	with
   2 at	T1
   2 at	T1,
   2 at	the
   2 attitudes	toward
   2 attractive	platform
   2 aware	of
   2 be	found
   2 become	an
   2 between	8
   2 between	watching
   2 beverage	advertising
   2 by	the
   2 case	with
   2 character	marketing
   2 characteristics	of
   2 children	indicated
   2 children	received
   2 children’s	dietary
   2 children’s	liking
   2 children’s	reported
   2 code	for
   2 comparable	to
   2 comparison	of
   2 consumed	the
   2 consumption	on
   2 current	Brief
   2 current	study
   2 data,	RMSEA
   2 day	before
   2 day	during
   2 days	(i.e.,
   2 debate	about
   2 description	of
   2 different	days
   2 direct	cue-reactivity
   2 distribution	or
   2 doi:	10.1187/cbe.13-04-0082
   2 drink	more
   2 drinks	and
   2 during	each
   2 each	data
   2 effect	size
   2 estimated	in
   2 every	other
   2 examine	the
   2 expected	to
   2 exposed	to
   2 exposure	and
   2 fat,	and
   2 findings	regarding
   2 fit	to
   2 food	and
   2 food	cues
   2 food	marketing,
   2 foods	that
   2 for	beverages
   2 for	influencers
   2 for	social
   2 for	such
   2 for	young
   2 form	of
   2 found	in
   2 from	0
   2 glasses	per
   2 guidelines	+
   2 has	become
   2 have	implications
   2 high	in
   2 impact	on
   2 implications	for
   2 in	sugar,
   2 increase	the
   2 indicated	on
   2 initial	age
   2 intake	in
   2 investigating	Unhealthy
   2 is	also
   2 is	often
   2 is	the
   2 is	to
   2 it	is
   2 items	over
   2 later.	The
   2 leading	to
   2 likely	that
   2 liking	of
   2 longer	term
   2 longitudinal	regression
   2 longitudinal	relation
   2 longitudinal	relations
   2 longitudinal	survey
   2 marketing	among
   2 marketing	by
   2 may	have
   2 media,	social
   2 model	investigating
   2 model	predicting
   2 modeling	analyses
   2 more	unhealthy
   2 not	yield
   2 obesity,	and
   2 observed	data,
   2 observed	for
   2 observed	longitudinal
   2 of	Frequency
   2 of	Interest
   2 of	Tennessee,
   2 of	Unhealthy
   2 of	a
   2 of	children’s
   2 of	media
   2 of	overweight,
   2 of	these
   2 of	three
   2 of	vlogs
   2 on	unhealthy
   2 one	for
   2 online	video
   2 or	reproduction
   2 other	day
   2 other	types
   2 over	a
   2 over	the
   2 overweight,	obesity,
   2 p-close	=
   2 part	of
   2 path	modeling
   2 paths	estimated
   2 physical	activity
   2 predicting	unhealthy
   2 predominantly	promote
   2 previous	findings
   2 primary	and
   2 promote	their
   2 randomized	controlled
   2 ranged	from
   2 regarding	more
   2 related	to
   2 relation	between
   2 relation	might
   2 relations	for
   2 reported	consumption
   2 restrictions	of
   2 risk	of
   2 score	for
   2 self-regulatory	code
   2 self-reported	frequency
   2 showed	a
   2 significant	relations
   2 simple	and
   2 social	network
   2 stability	paths
   2 such	a
   2 sugar,	fat,
   2 sugar-sweetened	beverages
   2 survey	data
   2 that	children’s
   2 that	exposure
   2 the	3
   2 the	Netherlands,
   2 the	advertised
   2 the	data
   2 the	day
   2 the	defining
   2 the	influence
   2 the	more
   2 the	original
   2 the	past
   2 the	relations
   2 the	risk
   2 the	time
   2 their	products.
   2 they	had
   2 three	different
   2 to	12-year-old
   2 to	6
   2 to	consumption
   2 to	examine
   2 to	participate
   2 to	previous
   2 total	score
   2 traditional	media
   2 traditional	media,
   2 traditional	types
   2 under	the
   2 use,	distribution
   2 van	Reijmersdal,
   2 van	Woudenberg,
   2 version	of
   2 vlogs	was
   2 was	calculated
   2 wave)	how
   2 we	analyzed
   2 were	significant.
   2 with	an
   2 with	more
   2 www.frontiersin.org	Table
   2 yield	significant
   2 χ^2/df	=
   2 0	=
   2 1	www.frontiersin.org
   2 6	=
   2 8	and
   2 10	January
   2 10.1187/cbe.13-04-0082	PubMed
   2 2006;	Buijzen
   2 2008;	Lipsky
   2 2012;	Boyland
   2 2016;	Pearson
   2 2018).	Response
   2 2019).	Google
   2 Influencers	on
   2 influence	of
   2 influence	on
   2 influencers	are
   2 influencers	predominantly
   1 (1	year;
   1 (1997).	The
   1 (1999).	Cutoff
   1 (2	years;
   1 (2006).	Television
   1 (2006).	The
   1 (2008).	Associations
   1 (2010).	Introducing
   1 (2010).	Set
   1 (2011).	Increase
   1 (2011).	Principles
   1 (2011).	Reconsidering
   1 (2011).	Using
   1 (2012).	Associations
   1 (2012).	Establishing
   1 (2012).	Use
   1 (2013).	The
   1 (2014)	demonstrated
   1 (2014).	“Reliability
   1 (2016).	A
   1 (2016).	Advertising
   1 (2016).	Food
   1 (2016).	From
   1 (2016).	YouTube
   1 (2017).	Children
   1 (2017).	Screen
   1 (2018).	An
   1 (2018).	Clustering
   1 (2018).	What’s
   1 (2018).	Youth’s
   1 (2019).	Children’s
   1 (2019).	Food
   1 (2019).	Testing
   1 (2019).	The
   1 (2020)	The
   1 (2020).	Signaling
   1 (70.4%),	7.8%
   1 (>90%).	The
   1 (Amsterdam:	University
   1 (BMI)	and
   1 (BUTTON)	(BUTTON)
   1 (BUTTON)	*
   1 (BUTTON)	Toggle
   1 (CC	BY).
   1 (Coates	et
   1 (De	Droog,
   1 (ECSS)	–
   1 (ECSW2014-100614-222).	Children
   1 (ERC),	investigating
   1 (FAS	II;
   1 (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC	grant
   1 (Folkvord	et
   1 (Hill	et
   1 (Hu	and
   1 (Lee	and
   1 (M	=
   1 (MLR	in
   1 (Maher	et
   1 (MyMovez,	2019),
   1 (NLM)	+
   1 (Ocke	et
   1 (Ofcom,	2017).
   1 (Rozendaal	et
   1 (Smit	et
   1 (T1),	2017
   1 (T2),	and
   1 (T3).	Participants
   1 (Tan	et
   1 (Van	Woudenberg
   1 (Vereecken	et
   1 (WHO,	2010).
   1 (WHO,	2010;
   1 (accessed	December
   1 (accessed	September
   1 (based	on
   1 (cf.	Folkvord
   1 (cf.	Opree
   1 (comparative	fit
   1 (current)Section	*
   1 (e.g.,	Vereecken
   1 (full-information)	maximum-likelihood
   1 (i.e.,	consumption
   1 (i.e.,	obese).
   1 (i.e.,	units)
   1 (i.e.,	using
   1 (i.e.,	video
   1 (project	nr.
   1 (range	1–13,
   1 (range	−2.69
   1 (reported	that
   1 (root	mean
   1 (see	Bevelander
   1 (video	weblogs)?
   1 (“influencers”)	who
   1 *	(current)Section
   1 *	+
   1 *	About
   1 *	Article
   1 *	Articles
   1 *	Download
   1 *	Editorial
   1 *	Export
   1 *	For
   1 *	Research
   1 *	View
   1 *	[CROSSMARK_Color_square.svg]
   1 *	^1Behavioural
   1 *	^2Radboud
   1 *	^3Erasmus
   1 *	total
   1 *Correspondence:	Moniek
   1 +	Abstract
   1 +	Article
   1 +	BibTex
   1 +	Conclusion
   1 +	Conflict
   1 +	Contact
   1 +	Data
   1 +	Discussion
   1 +	Download
   1 +	EPUB
   1 +	EndNote
   1 +	Ethics
   1 +	Fees
   1 +	Footnotes
   1 +	Funding
   1 +	Introduction
   1 +	Materials
   1 +	ReadCube
   1 +	Reference
   1 +	References
   1 +	Results
   1 +	Review
   1 +	Simple
   1 +	Submission
   1 +	Submit
   1 +	Supplementary
   1 +	Why
   1 +	XML
   1 -	Phase
   1 <0.08	and
   1 <3.0	(Hu
   1 =	0.04,
   1 =	0.05,
   1 =	0.17,
   1 =	0.55;
   1 =	0.59,
   1 =	0.591,
   1 =	0.62,
   1 =	0.62;
   1 =	0.64.
   1 =	0.647,
   1 =	0.65,
   1 =	0.68,
   1 =	0.69,
   1 =	0.69.
   1 =	0.70;
   1 =	0.71,
   1 =	0.72;
   1 =	0.90,
   1 =	0.93,
   1 =	0.97).
   1 =	1.08;
   1 =	1.39.
   1 =	1.52;
   1 =	1.55;
   1 =	1.79
   1 =	1.84).
   1 =	1.88.
   1 =	10.05;
   1 =	3.29,
   1 =	3.44,
   1 =	3.66,
   1 =	8.54,
   1 =	always
   1 =	never
   1 =	none
   1 =	seven
   1 =	six
   1 =	zero
   1 >	
   1 >	(BUTTON)
   1 >	SHARE
   1 >0.05),	CFI
   1 >0.90),	and
   1 A	more
   1 A	potential
   1 A	social
   1 A.	(2006).
   1 A.	(2011).
   1 A.	(2014).
   1 A.	E.,
   1 A.	S.,
   1 A.,	Hale,
   1 A.,	Pols,
   1 A.,	Todd,
   1 A.,	van
   1 ARTICLE	Front.
   1 ARTICLE	People
   1 About	*
   1 Abstract	+
   1 Accepted:	16
   1 Adolesc.	Med.
   1 Adolescents	View
   1 Advertising	as
   1 Advertising’s	Impact
   1 Affluence	Scale
   1 Affluence	at
   1 Affluence	measured
   1 Affluence	was
   1 After	gaining
   1 All	primary
   1 All	stability
   1 Almost	all
   1 Am.	J.
   1 Amsterdam),	25–54.
   1 Amsterdam.	Google
   1 Amsterdam:	University
   1 An	illustration
   1 An	integrated
   1 Analysis	The
   1 Analytical	model.
   1 Anschütz,	D.
   1 Appetite	103,
   1 Appetite	50,
   1 Arch.	Pediatr.
   1 Article	+
   1 Article	Impact
   1 Article	alerts
   1 Article	types
   1 Articles	*
   1 Articles	Articles
   1 Articles	Edited
   1 As	argued
   1 As	is
   1 As	with
   1 As	yet,
   1 Associations	between
   1 Associations	of
   1 At	the
   1 Attitudes	Report.
   1 Attribution	License
   1 Australia	Copyright
   1 Australia	Nora
   1 Australian	Catholic
   1 Author	guidelines
   1 Authority^2.	However,
   1 Averaging	children’s
   1 B.	(2011).
   1 B.	(2016).
   1 B.,	Buitendijk,
   1 B.,	Goddijn,
   1 B.,	Tudur-Smith,
   1 B.,	and
   1 BMI	and
   1 BMI	for
   1 BY).	The
   1 Bakker,	B.,
   1 Banda,	J.
   1 Based	on
   1 BeautyNezz”	They
   1 Behav.	Sci.
   1 Behaviors	Crystal
   1 Behaviors.	Front.
   1 Behavioural	Sciences,
   1 Bentler,	1999;
   1 Bentler,	P.
   1 Bevelander	KE
   1 Bevelander	and
   1 Bevelander^1,2	and
   1 Beverages	Consumption,
   1 Beverages	Consumption.
   1 Beverages	To
   1 Beverages	to
   1 BibTex	*
   1 Biddle,	S.
   1 Body	Mass
   1 Bomhof,	E.
   1 Boyce	et
   1 Boyce,	W.,
   1 Boyland,	E.,
   1 Boys	and
   1 Bueno-de-Mesquita,	H.
   1 Buijs	L,
   1 Buijs,	van
   1 Buijs^1,	Thabo
   1 Buijzen	M
   1 Buijzen,	m.buijzen@ru.nl
   1 Buijzen.	This
   1 Buijzen^1,3*	*
   1 Buitendijk,	S.
   1 Bus.	Res.
   1 C.	G.,
   1 C.	S.,
   1 C.,	Bueno-de-Mesquita,
   1 C.,	Jones,
   1 C.,	Mulvihill,
   1 C.,	et
   1 CBE	Life
   1 CFI	(comparative
   1 COMMENTARY	ORIGINAL
   1 CONTENTS	*
   1 CR,	Buijs
   1 Calvert,	S.
   1 Catholic	University,
   1 Center,	Nijmegen,
   1 Chandrasekar,	D.
   1 Characters	on
   1 Child.	Obes.
   1 Children	were
   1 Children.	Geneva:
   1 Children’s	Healthy
   1 Children’s	Materialism
   1 Children’s	bonding
   1 Choices.	Ph.D.
   1 Christiansen,	P.,
   1 Citation:	Smit
   1 CiteScore	3.2
   1 Clin.	Nutr.
   1 Clustering	and
   1 Coates,	A.
   1 Code:	YouTube”
   1 Cognition	(BUTTON)
   1 Collection	of
   1 Committee	Social
   1 Committee	of
   1 Commons	Attribution
   1 Commun.	16,
   1 Commun.	17,
   1 Commun.	Theory
   1 Comparing	the
   1 Comput.	Inf.
   1 Conclusion	+
   1 Conclusion	In
   1 Consum.	20,
   1 Consumed	by
   1 Consumer	Culture?
   1 Consumption	also
   1 Consumption	indicate
   1 Consumption	showed
   1 Consumption	was
   1 Consumption	were
   1 Consumption.	All
   1 Consumption.	The
   1 Consumption:	T1:
   1 Contact	editorial
   1 Contributions	+
   1 Contributions	All
   1 Control	Variables
   1 Copyright	©
   1 Council	(ERC),
   1 Council	under
   1 Creative	Commons
   1 Crystal	R.
   1 Culture?	Advertising’s
   1 Curr.	Opin.
   1 Currie,	C.,
   1 Cutoff	criteria
   1 D.	(2013).
   1 D.	(2020).
   1 D.	H.
   1 D.	J.,
   1 DANS	EASY
   1 Data	collection
   1 De	Droog
   1 De	Leeuw,
   1 December	20,
   1 December	2019;
   1 Dietary	Behaviors
   1 Dietary	Behaviors.
   1 Discussion	+
   1 Discussion	This
   1 Dommelen,	P.,
   1 Download	Article
   1 Download	PDF
   1 Drawing	on
   1 Droog,	2012;
   1 Due	to
   1 During	the
   1 Dutch	Media
   1 Dutch	children
   1 Dutch	origin
   1 E.	(2008).
   1 E.	(2018).
   1 E.	A.,
   1 E.	Bevelander^1,2
   1 E.	J.
   1 E.	J.,
   1 E.	Pritchard
   1 E.,	Hardman,
   1 E.,	HiraSing,
   1 E.,	Jansen,
   1 E.,	Kelly,
   1 E.,	Lapierre,
   1 E.,	Rozendaal,
   1 E.,	Smit,
   1 EASY	doi:
   1 EPIC	food
   1 EPUB	+
   1 ERC-COG-617253)	and
   1 ERC’s	Ethical
   1 Ebert-May,	D.
   1 Edited	by
   1 Edited	by:
   1 Editorial	board
   1 Educ.	12,
   1 EndNote	+
   1 EnzoKnol	or
   1 Epidemiol.	26,
   1 Equ.	Modeling
   1 Equation	Modeling.
   1 Erasmus	University
   1 Erica	Pritchard,
   1 Establishing	and
   1 Ethical	review
   1 European	Union’s
   1 Even	though
   1 Explaining	the
   1 Export	citation
   1 F.,	Anschütz,
   1 F.,	Bevelander,
   1 F.,	Calvert,
   1 FIGURE	1
   1 Factor	2.067
   1 Fees	+
   1 Figure	1
   1 Figure	1.
   1 Finally,	an
   1 First,	the
   1 Fleming-Milici,	F.,
   1 Following	paradigms
   1 Food	Choices.
   1 Food	advertising
   1 Food	and
   1 Food	marketing
   1 Foods	and
   1 Footnotes	+
   1 Footnotes	1.
   1 For	authors
   1 Framework	Programme
   1 From	digital
   1 Front.	Psychol.,
   1 Frontiers	in
   1 Funding	+
   1 Funding	This
   1 G.	Hoy
   1 G.	Hoy,
   1 G.,	Christiansen,
   1 Geneva:	World
   1 Given	the
   1 Goddijn,	H.
   1 Griffiths,	P.,
   1 Guilford	Press.
   1 H.	(2010).
   1 H.	(2016).
   1 H.	B.,
   1 H.	E.,
   1 H.,	Griffiths,
   1 H.,	Omar,
   1 H.,	van
   1 Hale,	L.,
   1 Hardman,	C.
   1 Haycraft,	E.
   1 Health	18:504.
   1 Health	18:753.
   1 Health	Nutrition
   1 Health	Organization.
   1 Health	Psychol.
   1 Healthy	Food
   1 Hermans,	R.
   1 Hill,	S.
   1 HiraSing,	R.
   1 However,	regulating
   1 Hoy	The
   1 Hoy,	The
   1 Hu,	L.
   1 I.	BMC
   1 I.,	and
   1 IFRAME:	https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-TZGWTGG&gtm_auth=fCzlsm
   1 II;	Boyce
   1 Iannotti,	R.
   1 Impact	Factor
   1 Impact	Suggest
   1 Impact	on
   1 Importantly,	the
   1 In	a
   1 In	addition,
   1 In	conclusion,
   1 In	such
   1 In	the
   1 Increase	in
   1 Ind.	Res.
   1 Index	(BMI)
   1 Institute,	Radboud
   1 Int.	J.
   1 Interest	+
   1 Interest	The
   1 Introducing	the
   1 Introduction	+
   1 Introduction	In
   1 J.	(2012).
   1 J.	(2019).
   1 J.	A.,
   1 J.	Bus.
   1 J.	C.
   1 J.	Clin.
   1 J.	Comput.
   1 J.	E.,
   1 J.	Epidemiol.
   1 J.	H.,
   1 J.	M.,
   1 J.	Opree
   1 J.	P.,
   1 J.	Rifon
   1 J.	Rifon,
   1 J.	van
   1 J.,	Bevelander,
   1 J.,	Boyland,
   1 J.,	Buijzen,
   1 J.,	Nolan,
   1 J.,	Roberts,
   1 J.,	Smit,
   1 J.,	et
   1 Jansen,	A.,
   1 January	2020
   1 January	2020.
   1 Johnston,	J.
   1 Jones,	A.,
   1 KB,	CS,
   1 KE	and
   1 Kapitan	and
   1 Kapitan,	S.,
   1 Karupaiah,	T.
   1 Keywords:	children,
   1 Kirsten	E.
   1 Kline,	2011).
   1 Kline,	R.
   1 L,	van
   1 L.	(2006).
   1 L.	H.
   1 L.	M.,
   1 L.	T.,
   1 L.,	Burk,
   1 L.,	Lu,
   1 L.,	Ng,
   1 L.,	and
   1 L.,	et
   1 L.,	van
   1 LB,	CS,
   1 LB,	KB,
   1 Lab	consisted
   1 Lab”	for
   1 Lapierre,	M.,
   1 Laura	Buijs^1,
   1 Lee	and
   1 Lee,	J.
   1 Lett.	27,
   1 License	(CC
   1 Life	Satisfaction,
   1 Life	Sci.
   1 Lipsky,	L.
   1 Lives	of
   1 Loading..	COMMENTARY
   1 Loop	research
   1 Lu,	A.
   1 M	(2020)
   1 M.	(1999).
   1 M.	(2011).
   1 M.	(2018).
   1 M.	(2019).
   1 M.	C.,
   1 M.,	Markey,
   1 M.,	Schuurman,
   1 M.,	Valkenburg,
   1 M.,	van
   1 MB	drafted
   1 MB	performed
   1 Maes,	L.
   1 Maher,	J.
   1 Manager	+
   1 Mark.	Lett.
   1 Marketing	of
   1 Markey,	J.
   1 Mass	Index
   1 Material	*
   1 Materialism	and
   1 Measures	Frequency
   1 Med.	166,
   1 Media	Authority^2.
   1 Media	Psychol.
   1 Media	Use
   1 Medical	Center,
   1 Methods	+
   1 Methods	We
   1 Model	Results
   1 Modeling	6,
   1 Modeling.	New
   1 Moniek	Buijzen,
   1 Moniek	Buijzen^1,3*
   1 More	on
   1 Moreover,	at
   1 Moreover,	while
   1 Mplus	Version
   1 Mplus)	to
   1 Mulvihill,	C.,
   1 MyMovez	(2019).
   1 MyMovez	Project.
   1 MyMovez	project.
   1 MyMovez	protocol
   1 MyMovez	“Wearable
   1 N.,	Banda,
   1 N.,	Biddle,
   1 NY:	The
   1 Netherlands	Over
   1 New	York,
   1 Ng,	S.
   1 No	use,
   1 Nolan,	S.,
   1 Non-Alcoholic	Beverages
   1 Nutr.	103,
   1 Nutrition	9,
   1 OF	CONTENTS
   1 ON	*
   1 ORIGINAL	ARTICLE
   1 Obes.	14,
   1 Ocke,	M.
   1 Ofcom,	(2017).
   1 Omar,	A.,
   1 One	6:e27608.
   1 Opin.	Behav.
   1 Opree	(Amsterdam:
   1 Opree,	S.
   1 Organization.	Google
   1 Over	the
   1 Owen,	L.
   1 P.	M.,
   1 P.,	Bakker,
   1 P.,	Johnston,
   1 PCMC-Model:	an
   1 PDF	+
   1 PLoS	One
   1 Parents:	Media
   1 Participants	A
   1 Pearson,	N.,
   1 Pediatr.	Adolesc.
   1 Pediatrics	140,
   1 People	also
   1 Ph.D.	thesis,
   1 Phase	I.
   1 Pols,	M.
   1 Practices	of
   1 Press.	Google
   1 Previous	research
   1 Previously	observed
   1 Principles	and
   1 Pritchard	Queensland
   1 Pritchard,	Australian
   1 Procedure	The
   1 Programme	(FP7/2007-2013)/ERC
   1 Project.	Available
   1 Psychol.	10:2142.
   1 Psychol.	10:2913.
   1 Psychol.	10:2975.
   1 Psychol.	14,
   1 Psychol.	37,
   1 Psychol.,	10
   1 Psychology	Cognition
   1 Published:	10
   1 Queensland	University
   1 R.	(2019).
   1 R.	A.,
   1 R.	B.
   1 R.	J.
   1 R.	Smit^1,
   1 R.,	Buijs,
   1 R.,	Troshani,
   1 R.,	Van
   1 R.,	de
   1 RMSEA	(root
   1 Radboud	University,
   1 Radboud	University.
   1 Rather	than
   1 ReadCube	+
   1 Received:	14
   1 Recommendations	on
   1 Reconsidering	advertising
   1 Reference	Manager
   1 References	Bevelander,
   1 References	Suggest
   1 Report	ARTICLE
   1 Report	presented
   1 Report.	Available
   1 Requests	to
   1 Res.	69,
   1 Res.	78,
   1 Research	shows
   1 Research	topics
   1 Response	categories
   1 Response	options
   1 Results	+
   1 Results	Strategy
   1 Results	The
   1 Review	guidelines
   1 Reviewed	by
   1 Reviewed	by:
   1 Rifon	Michigan
   1 Rifon,	Michigan
   1 Roberts,	C.,
   1 Robinson	et
   1 Robinson,	T.
   1 Role	of
   1 Rotterdam,	Netherlands
   1 Rotterdam,	Rotterdam,
   1 Rozendaal	et
   1 S.	E.,
   1 S.	H.,
   1 S.	J.,
   1 S.	L.,
   1 S.	M.
   1 S.	R.,
   1 S.,	De
   1 S.,	Fleming-Milici,
   1 S.,	Kelly,
   1 S.,	and
   1 S37–S34.	doi:
   1 S97–S101.	doi:
   1 SHARE	ON
   1 Satisfaction,	ed.
   1 Scale	(FAS
   1 Scholar	Boyce,
   1 Scholar	Boyland,
   1 Scholar	Coates,
   1 Scholar	Hill,
   1 Scholar	Hu,
   1 Scholar	Kapitan,
   1 Scholar	Keywords:
   1 Scholar	Kline,
   1 Scholar	Lee,
   1 Scholar	Lipsky,
   1 Scholar	Maher,
   1 Scholar	MyMovez
   1 Scholar	Ocke,
   1 Scholar	Ofcom,
   1 Scholar	Opree,
   1 Scholar	Pearson,
   1 Scholar	Robinson,
   1 Scholar	Rozendaal,
   1 Scholar	Schönbeck,
   1 Scholar	Tan,
   1 Scholar	Van
   1 Scholar	Vereecken,
   1 Scholar	WHO,
   1 School	of
   1 Schuurman,	J.,
   1 Schönbeck	et
   1 Schönbeck,	Y.,
   1 Sci.	9,
   1 Sci.	Educ.
   1 Science	(ECSS)
   1 Science	Institute,
   1 Sciences	(ECSW2014-100614-222).
   1 Sciences,	Erasmus
   1 Screen	media
   1 Section	*
   1 September	11,
   1 September	2019;
   1 Set	of
   1 Seventh	Framework
   1 Several	countries
   1 Signaling	effects
   1 Silvera,	2016;
   1 Silvera,	D.
   1 Similar	to
   1 Simple	TEXT
   1 Since	then,
   1 Smit	CR,
   1 Smit,	Buijs,
   1 Smit^1,	Laura
   1 Snacks	Consumption,
   1 Snacks	Consumption.
   1 Snacks	Consumption:
   1 Snacks	To
   1 Soc.	Ind.
   1 Social	Code:
   1 Social	Science
   1 Social	Sciences
   1 Social	and
   1 Specifically,	drawing
   1 Specifically,	there
   1 Springs	of
   1 Statement	Requests
   1 Statement	The
   1 States	The
   1 States	Verena
   1 Staveren,	W.
   1 Strategy	of
   1 Struct.	Equ.
   1 Structural	Equation
   1 Submission	checklist
   1 Submit	your
   1 Supplementary	Material
   1 Syst.	60,
   1 T.	(2018).
   1 T.	N.,
   1 T.,	Currie,
   1 T.,	and
   1 T1	significantly
   1 T1,	T2,
   1 T1,	and
   1 T1–T2,	and
   1 T1–T3),	and
   1 T2	and
   1 T2	to
   1 T2,	and
   1 T2–T3).	First,
   1 T3	to
   1 TABLE	1
   1 TABLE	2
   1 TABLE	OF
   1 TEXT	file
   1 TJ,	Bevelander
   1 TW.	LB,
   1 Table	1
   1 Table	1.
   1 Table	2,
   1 Table	2.
   1 Talma,	H.,
   1 Tan,	L.,
   1 Technology,	Australia
   1 Television	watching
   1 Testing	a
   1 Thabo	J.
   1 The	Guilford
   1 The	Role
   1 The	aim
   1 The	authors
   1 The	dutch
   1 The	editor
   1 The	family
   1 The	fit
   1 The	initial
   1 The	majority
   1 The	models
   1 The	observed
   1 The	parameters
   1 The	question
   1 The	sample
   1 The	smartphone-administered
   1 The	strength
   1 The	studies
   1 The	use,
   1 Theoretically,	they
   1 Theory	20,
   1 There	are
   1 Thereby,	vlogs
   1 Therefore,	the
   1 Therefore,	to
   1 These	changing
   1 These	studies
   1 They	could
   1 Think	of
   1 This	Brief
   1 This	Wearable
   1 This	article
   1 This	influencer
   1 This	is
   1 This	meant
   1 This	research
   1 To	come
   1 Todd,	J.,
   1 Toggle	navigation
   1 Topic	The
   1 Torsheim,	T.,
   1 Troshani,	I.,
   1 Tudur-Smith,	C.,
   1 Union’s	Seventh
   1 University	Medical
   1 University	Rotterdam,
   1 University,	Australia
   1 University,	Nijmegen,
   1 University.	Written
   1 Use	a
   1 Use	and
   1 Using	brand
   1 Van	Reijmersdal,
   1 Van	Woudenberg
   1 Variables	We
   1 Vereecken	et
   1 Vereecken,	C.
   1 Verena	E.
   1 Verena	Erica
   1 Version	8.3,
   1 Via	the
   1 View	Article
   1 View	all
   1 Vlogs	Following
   1 Vlogs	at
   1 Vlogs	of
   1 Vlogs	to
   1 Vlogs	with
   1 Vlogs,	children
   1 Vlogs^1.	In
   1 W.	A.,
   1 W.,	Torsheim,
   1 WHO,	(2010).
   1 Watching	Vlogs,
   1 Watching	Vlogs^1.
   1 Watching	these
   1 Watkins,	2016).
   1 Watkins,	2016;
   1 Watkins,	B.
   1 We	had
   1 We	included
   1 We	used
   1 Wearable	Lab
   1 Western	countries.
   1 What’s	on
   1 Why	submit?
   1 With	recognition
   1 World	Health
   1 Woudenberg	TJ,
   1 Woudenberg,	Bevelander
   1 Woudenberg^1,	Kirsten
   1 Written	informed
   1 XML	(NLM)
   1 Y.,	Talma,
   1 YQFAUQ_UXneGJNag&gtm_preview=env-2&gtm_cookies_win=x	Impact
   1 York,	NY:
   1 YouTube	videos
   1 YouTube	vloggers
   1 YouTube	vloggers’
   1 YouTube?	a
   1 YouTube”	in
   1 Young	Children’s
   1 Young	Consum.
   1 Youth’s	social
   1 Zambon,	A.
   1 [CROSSMARK_Color_square.svg]	Brief
   1 ^	https://mediaexposuremeasures.org/
   1 ^	www.desocialcode.nl
   1 ^1Behavioural	Science
   1 ^2Radboud	University
   1 ^3Erasmus	School
   1 a	1
   1 a	6-point
   1 a	brand
   1 a	carrot?
   1 a	case
   1 a	comparison
   1 a	cue
   1 a	cue-response
   1 a	defense
   1 a	detailed
   1 a	first
   1 a	healthy
   1 a	household
   1 a	huge
   1 a	longer-term
   1 a	measure
   1 a	more
   1 a	normal
   1 a	one
   1 a	particular
   1 a	particularly
   1 a	popular
   1 a	potential
   1 a	pre-installed
   1 a	promising
   1 a	question
   1 a	rabbit
   1 a	rapidly
   1 a	regular
   1 a	reliable
   1 a	rhino
   1 a	similar
   1 a	simple
   1 a	smartphone
   1 a	social
   1 a	specific
   1 a	stronger
   1 a	total
   1 able	to
   1 about	equally:
   1 about	food
   1 about	non-traditional
   1 above,	it
   1 absence	of
   1 academic	and
   1 academic	practice.
   1 accepted	academic
   1 access	the
   1 accordance	with
   1 accumulated,	for
   1 active	written
   1 activities,	vlog-based
   1 activity	among
   1 activity	behaviors,
   1 activity	tracking
   1 acute	exposure
   1 addition,	the
   1 additional	explanation
   1 address.	Data
   1 adolescent	self-report
   1 adolescents.	Health
   1 adolescents.	Pediatrics
   1 adolescents’	viewing
   1 adults.	Am.
   1 advertise	products
   1 advertised	products,
   1 advertised	products.
   1 advertised	without
   1 advertisers	to
   1 advertising	and
   1 advertising	being
   1 advertising	critically
   1 advertising	effects
   1 advertising	effects,
   1 advertising	effects.
   1 advertising	formats.
   1 advertising	has
   1 advertising	in
   1 advertising	literacy
   1 advertising	processing
   1 advertising	than
   1 advertising,	such
   1 advertising.	A
   1 advertising.	Therefore,
   1 affiliations	are
   1 affluence	scale
   1 against	advertising
   1 age	between
   1 age	of
   1 agreement	n°617253.
   1 al.	(1997).
   1 al.	(2011).
   1 al.	(2014)
   1 al.	(2016).
   1 al.	(2017).
   1 al.	(2018).
   1 al.,	1997;
   1 al.,	2006)
   1 al.,	2010)
   1 al.,	2010).
   1 al.,	2010;
   1 al.,	2011).
   1 al.,	2011,
   1 al.,	2012),
   1 al.,	2012).
   1 al.,	2013),
   1 al.,	2014).
   1 al.,	2016,
   1 al.,	2017).
   1 al.,	2018
   1 al.,	2018;
   1 al.,	2019;
   1 al.,	2020).
   1 al.’s	findings
   1 alerts	This
   1 all	12
   1 all	children
   1 all	stability
   1 also	be
   1 also	have
   1 also	hold
   1 also	including
   1 also	looked
   1 also	meant
   1 also	of
   1 also	received
   1 also	showed
   1 also	the
   1 alternatives.	Struct.
   1 always	(cf.
   1 am	and
   1 among	8-
   1 among	adolescents:
   1 among	children
   1 among	other
   1 among	the
   1 among	younger
   1 an	activity
   1 an	additional
   1 an	adolescent
   1 an	arguably
   1 an	effect
   1 an	explorative
   1 an	exploratory
   1 an	important
   1 an	initial
   1 an	investigative
   1 an	open-access
   1 analyses	and
   1 analyses	consisted
   1 analyses	for
   1 analyses.	The
   1 analysis	in
   1 analysis:	conventional
   1 and	12
   1 and	15
   1 and	2009.
   1 and	2018
   1 and	5.3%
   1 and	7:30
   1 and	Adolescents
   1 and	Attitudes
   1 and	Behavioural
   1 and	Bomhof,
   1 and	Boyland,
   1 and	Buijzen
   1 and	Buijzen.
   1 and	Chandrasekar,
   1 and	Ebert-May,
   1 and	Explaining
   1 and	Haycraft,
   1 and	Hermans,
   1 and	Karupaiah,
   1 and	Life
   1 and	MB
   1 and	Maes,
   1 and	Moniek
   1 and	Non-Alcoholic
   1 and	Owen,
   1 and	Parents:
   1 and	Practices
   1 and	T2
   1 and	T2–T3).
   1 and	T3.
   1 and	TW.
   1 and	Valkenburg,
   1 and	Van
   1 and	Zambon,
   1 and	adolescents.
   1 and	adolescents:
   1 and	adults.
   1 and	an
   1 and	associations
   1 and	attitudes
   1 and	behavioral
   1 and	believe
   1 and	characteristics
   1 and	children’s
   1 and	clothing
   1 and	correlates
   1 and	critical
   1 and	dietary
   1 and	effects
   1 and	finalized
   1 and	for
   1 and	girls
   1 and	high
   1 and	identification
   1 and	immediately
   1 and	intentions.
   1 and	interpretation.
   1 and	long-term
   1 and	may
   1 and	meta-analysis
   1 and	nonalcoholic
   1 and	not
   1 and	nuts
   1 and	obesity
   1 and	one
   1 and	other
   1 and	p-close
   1 and	peer
   1 and	physical
   1 and	potential
   1 and	product
   1 and	purchase
   1 and	relative
   1 and	reproducibility
   1 and	restrictions
   1 and	reviewers'
   1 and	selling
   1 and	snacks,
   1 and	social
   1 and	sports
   1 and	that
   1 and	timing
   1 and	valid
   1 and	validity
   1 and	van
   1 and	vloggers.
   1 and	vlogs,
   1 and	was
   1 and	water
   1 and	whom
   1 and	χ^2/df
   1 any	commercial
   1 appeals.	In
   1 application	and
   1 application,	children
   1 applying	the
   1 approval	of
   1 approved	by
   1 approved	the
   1 approximately	200
   1 approximation,	with
   1 are	a
   1 are	among
   1 are	an
   1 are	credited
   1 are	expected
   1 are	exposed
   1 are	not
   1 are	often
   1 are	several
   1 are	the
   1 arguably	strong
   1 argued	above,
   1 article	distributed
   1 article	is
   1 as	EnzoKnol
   1 as	Frequency
   1 as	advertising
   1 as	for
   1 as	one
   1 as	parasocial
   1 as	small
   1 as	sugar-sweetened
   1 as	television
   1 as	television,
   1 as	the
   1 asked	“How
   1 assessed	with
   1 assessed,	among
   1 association,	given
   1 associations	between
   1 associations,	finding
   1 associations.	Moreover,
   1 assumes	that
   1 at	Suggest
   1 at	T3.
   1 at	children
   1 at	random
   1 at:	http://mymovez.eu/
   1 at:	https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/chil
   1 attention	to
   1 attention.	These
   1 attitudinal	and
   1 attractive	characters
   1 attributions	drive
   1 audiences	of
   1 audiences	with
   1 author(s)	and
   1 authors	+
   1 authors	contributed
   1 authors	declare
   1 authors	provided
   1 automatic	level
   1 averaging	children’s
   1 bans	of
   1 bars,	sweets
   1 basic	model
   1 be	advertised
   1 be	construed
   1 be	expected
   1 be	interpreted
   1 be	made
   1 beauty	and
   1 because	it
   1 become	a
   1 becoming	more
   1 been	associated
   1 been	investigated.
   1 before	(Ocke
   1 before	(Smit
   1 behavior	in
   1 behavior	via
   1 behavior.	In
   1 behavioral	change
   1 behavioral	responses
   1 behaviors	(WHO,
   1 behaviors	(i.e.,
   1 behaviors	Citation:
   1 behaviors	from
   1 behaviors	have
   1 behaviors	in
   1 behaviors,	Van
   1 behaviors,	there
   1 behaviors.	BMI
   1 behaviors.	Drawing
   1 behaviors.	Specifically,
   1 behaviors.	Structural
   1 behaviour	and
   1 behaviour	in
   1 behaviours	among
   1 being	a
   1 being	developed
   1 believe	(De
   1 between	7:00
   1 between	8-
   1 between	Frequency
   1 between	more
   1 beverage	cues
   1 beverages	can
   1 beverages	consumption.
   1 beverages	in
   1 beverages	over
   1 beverages	was
   1 beverages	yielded
   1 beverages,	energy-dense
   1 board	(project
   1 board	*
   1 bonbons,	chocolate
   1 bonding	with
   1 bottle,	or
   1 bracelet	(Bevelander
   1 brand	(Hill
   1 brand	and
   1 brand	characters
   1 brand	perceptions
   1 brands.	It
   1 breaks.	The
   1 build	parasocial
   1 but	did
   1 but	not
   1 but	that
   1 by	Consumer
   1 by	Ethics
   1 by	LB,
   1 by	Mariea
   1 by	Verena
   1 by	averaging
   1 by	examining
   1 by:	Mariea
   1 by:	Nora
   1 calculated	and
   1 calculated	using
   1 calendar	days,
   1 can	build
   1 can	lead
   1 can	still
   1 can,	bottle,
   1 capacity	to
   1 captured	with
   1 caretakers	as
   1 carrot?	The
   1 case	for
   1 case	study
   1 categories	ranged
   1 categories	that
   1 causes	for
   1 celebrity	endorsers:
   1 challenges	for
   1 change	(Buijzen
   1 changing	circumstances
   1 channel	provides
   1 channel.	Therefore,
   1 channels	where
   1 character	marketing,
   1 character	of
   1 character-product	congruence
   1 characteristic	of
   1 characteristics	that
   1 characters	(De
   1 characters	on
   1 characters	represent
   1 characters	to
   1 characters	with
   1 checklist	+
   1 child	was
   1 child-directed	food
   1 child-influencer	relationship
   1 childhood	obesity
   1 children	(De
   1 children	(e.g.,
   1 children	(i.e.,
   1 children	(range
   1 children	(reported
   1 children	are
   1 children	becoming
   1 children	can
   1 children	even
   1 children	had
   1 children	on
   1 children	ranged
   1 children	study.
   1 children	that
   1 children	themselves.
   1 children	to
   1 children	who
   1 children	will
   1 children	with
   1 children,	food
   1 children,	social
   1 children,	we
   1 children.	BMC
   1 children.	Curr.
   1 children.	Importantly,
   1 children.	Moreover,
   1 children.	Previously
   1 children.	The
   1 children:	an
   1 children’s	Frequency
   1 children’s	advertising
   1 children’s	caretakers
   1 children’s	daily
   1 children’s	television
   1 chips	or
   1 chocolate	bars,
   1 chocolates	or
   1 circumstances	may
   1 citation	+
   1 cited,	in
   1 clothing	brands.
   1 collection	funded
   1 collection	was
   1 collection	wave)
   1 collection	waves
   1 combination	with
   1 come	to
   1 commercial	or
   1 commercialized	media
   1 commercials.	With
   1 complex	effect
   1 comply	with
   1 conclusion,	our
   1 conclusions	about
   1 conducted	in
   1 conflict	of
   1 congruence	on
   1 consecutive	calendar
   1 consent	to
   1 consent	was
   1 considerable	restrictions
   1 consistent	with
   1 constructed	by
   1 construed	as
   1 consume:	a
   1 consumer	luxury
   1 consumers.	J.
   1 consumption	behavior
   1 consumption	over
   1 consumption	patterns:
   1 consumption,	for
   1 consumption.	Discussion
   1 consumption.	Our
   1 consumption.	The
   1 consumption:	a
   1 content	and
   1 content	of
   1 content,	rendering
   1 content.	Commun.
   1 context	and
   1 contributed	to
   1 control	trial.
   1 controlled	for
   1 controlled	trial
   1 controlled	trial.
   1 conventional	criteria
   1 convincing	evidence
   1 convincingly	shown
   1 cookies,	chocolates
   1 cookies,	large
   1 cookies,	wrapped
   1 copyright	owner(s)
   1 correlates	of
   1 could	be
   1 could	respond
   1 countries	have
   1 countries.	Our
   1 countries.	Public
   1 covariance	structure
   1 covariances	between
   1 credited	and
   1 crisis,	food
   1 criteria	for
   1 criteria	versus
   1 critical	about
   1 critical	revisions
   1 critically	(Rozendaal
   1 cross-sectional	covariances
   1 cue	to
   1 cue-reactivity	effect,
   1 cue-reactivity	explanation
   1 cue-reactivity	mechanisms
   1 cue-response	mechanism
   1 cues	directly
   1 cues	featured
   1 cues	in
   1 daily	media
   1 daily	questionnaires
   1 data	analyses
   1 data	showed
   1 data	used
   1 data	wave)
   1 data	with
   1 dataset	can
   1 day	to
   1 day.	An
   1 days	produced
   1 days	were
   1 days,	including
   1 days:	T1:
   1 de	Leeuw,
   1 decades,	sometimes
   1 decisive	conclusions
   1 declare	that
   1 defend	themselves
   1 defense	against
   1 defining	characteristic
   1 defining	characteristics
   1 demonstrated	that
   1 demonstrates	that
   1 depicting	unhealthy
   1 depicts	the
   1 description).	All
   1 design.	Data
   1 designs,	with
   1 detailed	description
   1 detailed	description).
   1 developed	in
   1 deviations	from
   1 diary-survey	study.
   1 did	drink
   1 dietary	behaviors,
   1 dietary	consumption.
   1 dietary	patterns
   1 differences	that
   1 different	countries.
   1 difficult	for
   1 digital	media
   1 direction,	such
   1 directly	and
   1 directors,	active
   1 diseases	(WHO,
   1 diseases.	The
   1 distributed	under
   1 do	you
   1 does	not
   1 doi:	10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1407
   1 doi:	10.1007/s11002-015-9363-0
   1 doi:	10.1007/s11205-005-1607-6
   1 doi:	10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.006
   1 doi:	10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.011
   1 doi:	10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.11.016
   1 doi:	10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171
   1 doi:	10.1037/hea0000691
   1 doi:	10.1079/PHN2005847
   1 doi:	10.1080/08874417.2017.1400929
   1 doi:	10.1080/10705519909540118
   1 doi:	10.1080/10810730.2010.529487
   1 doi:	10.1080/10810730.2011.650833
   1 doi:	10.1080/15213269.2011.620540
   1 doi:	10.1089/chi.2018.0037
   1 doi:	10.1108/YC-12-2018-0896
   1 doi:	10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01370
   1 doi:	10.1186/s12889-018-5353-5
   1 doi:	10.1186/s12889-018-5698-9
   1 doi:	10.1371/journal.pone.0027608
   1 doi:	10.1542/peds.2016-1758K
   1 doi:	10.17026/dans-zz9-gn44.
   1 doi:	10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02142
   1 doi:	10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02913
   1 doi:	10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02975
   1 doi:	10.3945/ajcn.115.120022
   1 dose-response	associations,
   1 drafted	and
   1 drawing	on
   1 drens/children-parents-2017	(accessed
   1 drinks	they
   1 drive	endorser
   1 drunk	the
   1 due	to
   1 during	school
   1 during	the
   1 dutch	EPIC
   1 dutch	children
   1 each	child
   1 early	days
   1 eating	behavior
   1 eating	behaviors
   1 eating	behaviours
   1 ed.	S.
   1 editor	and
   1 editorial	office
   1 education	program
   1 effect	mechanism
   1 effect	mechanism.
   1 effect	of
   1 effect	on
   1 effect,	these
   1 effective	strategy
   1 effectiveness	of
   1 effectiveness.	Mark.
   1 effects	by
   1 effects,	which
   1 effects.	Media
   1 eight	items
   1 elaborate,	automatic
   1 eligible	for
   1 embedded	food
   1 endorsements	in
   1 endorser	effectiveness.
   1 endorsers:	attributions
   1 enduring	attitudinal
   1 energy-,	and
   1 energy-dense	snacks)
   1 energy-dense	snacks,
   1 environment	has
   1 environment	is
   1 environmental	factors
   1 equally:	52.5%
   1 error	of
   1 errors	(MLR
   1 estimate	of
   1 estimated	applying
   1 estimator	with
   1 et	al.’s
   1 ethical	approval
   1 even	involving
   1 even	stronger
   1 even	taking
   1 evidence	for
   1 evokes	behavioral
   1 evolve.	Given
   1 evolving	form
   1 examining	Unhealthy
   1 examining	a
   1 example	beauty
   1 example	due
   1 example	“The
   1 excellent	stimulus
   1 except	for
   1 existing	traditional
   1 expected	that
   1 experimental	designs,
   1 experimental	research
   1 explanation	for
   1 explanation	might
   1 explanation	of
   1 explanations	why
   1 explorative	study.
   1 exploratory	study.
   1 exposure	measures
   1 exposure	measures,”
   1 exposure,	exposure
   1 extend	the
   1 extremely	overweight
   1 factors	(e.g.,
   1 factors	related
   1 familiar	with
   1 familiarity	of
   1 family	affluence
   1 far	only
   1 featured	in
   1 features	of
   1 few	media
   1 file	+
   1 final	version
   1 finalized	the
   1 financial	relationships
   1 find	a
   1 finding	that
   1 findings	also
   1 findings	have
   1 findings	on
   1 findings	showed
   1 first	prerequisite
   1 first	step
   1 first	study
   1 fit	index,
   1 fit	indexes
   1 fit	indices:
   1 fit	of
   1 five	items
   1 focused	on
   1 followed	a
   1 following	good
   1 food	advertising,
   1 food	consumption
   1 food	frequency
   1 food	groups.
   1 food	habits
   1 food	in
   1 food	industries
   1 food	industries,
   1 food	industry
   1 food	promotion
   1 food	promotion;
   1 food-related	content
   1 foods	can
   1 foods	is
   1 foods.	J.
   1 for	BMI
   1 for	Dutch
   1 for	a
   1 for	advertisers
   1 for	character
   1 for	children
   1 for	children’s
   1 for	cross-sectional
   1 for	each
   1 for	experimental
   1 for	fit
   1 for	fruit.
   1 for	further
   1 for	individual
   1 for	influencer
   1 for	interindividual
   1 for	many
   1 for	media
   1 for	missing
   1 for	only
   1 for	other
   1 for	participation.
   1 for	policies
   1 for	school
   1 for	seven
   1 for	snacks
   1 for	submission.
   1 for	traditional
   1 for	vlogs
   1 for	watching
   1 formation	and
   1 formation	of
   1 formats.	Based
   1 formula:	weight
   1 forums	is
   1 framework	for
   1 frequency	questionnaire:
   1 from	1
   1 from	453
   1 from	Frequency
   1 from	T1
   1 from	T1–T2,
   1 from	T1–T3),
   1 from	a
   1 from	children’s
   1 from	multivariate
   1 from	vloggers
   1 fruit	juice,
   1 fruit,	vegetable,
   1 fruit.	J.
   1 fundamental	challenges
   1 funded	by
   1 funding	from
   1 further	research.
   1 gaining	permission
   1 generally	studied
   1 girls	were
   1 girls.	Almost
   1 given	the
   1 glass”	also
   1 grant	agreement
   1 great	number
   1 groups.	Int.
   1 growth	studies
   1 guardian/next	of
   1 habits	in
   1 had	a
   1 had	consumed
   1 had	drunk
   1 had	expected
   1 half	of
   1 has	convincingly
   1 has	focused
   1 has	received
   1 has	witnessed
   1 have	accumulated,
   1 have	become
   1 have	generally
   1 have	led
   1 have	not
   1 have	resulted
   1 have	so
   1 have	taken
   1 have	the
   1 health	behaviour
   1 healthy	foods.
   1 healthy	lifestyle
   1 healthy	lifestyles,
   1 here	consisted
   1 high	energy-dense
   1 higher	consumption
   1 highly	attractive
   1 highly	integrated
   1 hold	for
   1 host	institution’s
   1 hours,	except
   1 household	diary-survey
   1 how	many
   1 how	much
   1 http://mymovez.eu/	(accessed
   1 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02975	The
   1 https://mediaexposuremeasures.org/	2.
   1 https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-TZGWTGG&gtm_auth=fCzlsm	YQFAUQ_UXneGJNag&gtm_preview=env-2&gtm_cookies_win=x
   1 https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/chil	drens/children-parents-2017
   1 huge	part
   1 human	participants
   1 i.	description
   1 identification	with
   1 identification;	Folkvord
   1 identify	themselves,
   1 illustration	was
   1 immediately	evokes
   1 impact	›
   1 impact,	including
   1 important	way
   1 improved	adolescents’
   1 in	1980,
   1 in	Consumed
   1 in	Mplus)
   1 in	Psychology
   1 in	YouTube
   1 in	accordance
   1 in	children.
   1 in	combination
   1 in	covariance
   1 in	different
   1 in	dutch
   1 in	kg/height
   1 in	line
   1 in	m.
   1 in	more
   1 in	most
   1 in	other
   1 in	prevalence
   1 in	quantitative
   1 in	school-aged
   1 in	those
   1 in	videos
   1 in	vlogs
   1 in	vlogs.
   1 in	vlogs:
   1 in	young
   1 included	Body
   1 included	regression
   1 including	for
   1 including	message
   1 including	the
   1 increases	the
   1 index,	with
   1 indexes	in
   1 indicate	a
   1 indices:	RMSEA
   1 individual	differences
   1 individual,	psychosocial,
   1 industries	to
   1 industries,	sponsoring
   1 industry	to
   1 insight	into
   1 institution’s	Ethics
   1 instruct	the
   1 integrated	advertising,
   1 integrated	model
   1 integrated	with
   1 integration	of
   1 intentions.	J.
   1 interest,	because
   1 interest.	Funding
   1 interindividual	stability
   1 interpretation.	MB
   1 interpreted	as
   1 intervals	showed
   1 intervention	stimulating
   1 intervention	using
   1 into	the
   1 investigate	the
   1 investigated.	Previous
   1 investigating	youth’s
   1 investigative	framework
   1 involve	longer
   1 involved	in
   1 involves	a
   1 involves	the
   1 involving	human
   1 involving	total
   1 is	an
   1 is	associated
   1 is	cited,
   1 is	comparable
   1 is	convincing
   1 is	even
   1 is	likely
   1 is	part
   1 is	permitted
   1 is	permitted,
   1 is	plausible
   1 is	still
   1 is,	the
   1 it	as
   1 it	can
   1 it	less
   1 it	more
   1 it	raises
   1 items	can
   1 its	persuasive
   1 journal	is
   1 juice,	lemonade
   1 kg/height	in
   1 kin.	Author
   1 knowledge	may
   1 large	cookies,
   1 large	variety
   1 large-scale	data
   1 large-scale	project
   1 largest	audiences
   1 later.	TABLE
   1 latest	provided
   1 lead	to
   1 leading	from
   1 led	to
   1 legal	guardian/next
   1 lemonade	(based
   1 less	aware
   1 less	likely
   1 licorice,	potato
   1 lie	in
   1 lifestyle	(see
   1 lifestyles,	we
   1 line	with
   1 literacy	as
   1 literacy	programs
   1 literature	of
   1 long	term
   1 long-term	relations
   1 longer-term	relation
   1 longitudinal	data
   1 longitudinal	impact
   1 looked	at
   1 low	elaborate,
   1 luxury	brand
   1 m.	z-BMI
   1 m.buijzen@ru.nl	Loading..
   1 made	via
   1 main	causes
   1 majority	of
   1 makes	it
   1 manuscript	*
   1 manuscript	for
   1 manuscript.	All
   1 many	children
   1 many	pieces
   1 marketing	(Tan
   1 marketing	(Vereecken
   1 marketing	and
   1 marketing	has
   1 marketing	on
   1 marketing	technique
   1 marketing	to
   1 marketing,	it
   1 marketing,	such
   1 marketing,	the
   1 marketing,	vlogs,
   1 marketing.	Introduction
   1 marketing.	Since
   1 marketing.	Theoretically,
   1 marketing.	To
   1 materials	for
   1 maximum-likelihood	estimator
   1 may	increase
   1 may	not
   1 may	provide
   1 may	trigger
   1 mean	square
   1 meant	one
   1 meant	that
   1 measure	Frequency
   1 measure	of
   1 measure.	Soc.
   1 measured	at
   1 measurement	of
   1 measures	among
   1 measures,	children’s
   1 measures,”	in
   1 mechanism	for
   1 mechanism	that
   1 mechanism.	The
   1 mechanisms	(Folkvord
   1 mechanisms	involve
   1 mechanisms	involved
   1 mechanisms	observed
   1 mechanisms	that
   1 mechanisms	underlying
   1 media	activities,
   1 media	attention.
   1 media	channel
   1 media	channels
   1 media	consumption,
   1 media	content.
   1 media	depicting
   1 media	environment
   1 media	exposure
   1 media	exposure,
   1 media	influencer
   1 media	influencers,
   1 media	influencers.
   1 media	is
   1 media	literacy
   1 media	messages
   1 media	personalities
   1 media	policy,
   1 media	such
   1 media	with
   1 media-based	regulatory
   1 media.	Child.
   1 message	factors
   1 messages	can
   1 meta-analysis	of
   1 might	affect
   1 might	also
   1 might	lie
   1 might	point
   1 missing	values
   1 ml.	A
   1 model	examining
   1 model	of
   1 model	tested
   1 model,	demonstrates
   1 model.	Model
   1 modeled.	There
   1 models	(Buijzen
   1 models	controlled
   1 models	included
   1 models	using
   1 models	was
   1 models	were
   1 more	aware
   1 more	children
   1 more	complex
   1 more	detailed
   1 more	difficult
   1 more	glasses
   1 more	pronounced
   1 more	specific
   1 more	they
   1 more	time
   1 more	vlogs,
   1 more.	Averaging
   1 most	Western
   1 much	sweetened
   1 multivariate	normality.
   1 mymovez	project
   1 named	as
   1 national	wealth:
   1 nationwide	growth
   1 navigation	Section
   1 needs	more
   1 network	intervention
   1 network	structures
   1 network-based	intervention
   1 networks	in
   1 never	to
   1 new	alternatives.
   1 new	form
   1 new	forms
   1 new	phenomenon.
   1 new	questions
   1 non-communicable	diseases
   1 non-communicable	diseases.
   1 non-familiar	vloggers
   1 non-significant.	This
   1 non-traditional	advertising
   1 non-traditional	forms
   1 nonalcoholic	beverage
   1 none	of
   1 none	to
   1 nor	for
   1 normal	weight
   1 normality.	The
   1 not	able
   1 not	been
   1 not	comply
   1 not	consistent
   1 not	drink
   1 not	during
   1 not	for
   1 not	in
   1 not	reflect
   1 nr.	ERC-COG-617253)
   1 number	of
   1 nuts	or
   1 n°617253.	Footnotes
   1 obese).	Procedure
   1 obesity	crisis,
   1 obesity	in
   1 observed	associations
   1 observed	patterns
   1 observing	a
   1 obtained	from
   1 occur	for
   1 of	2016
   1 of	453
   1 of	953
   1 of	<0.08
   1 of	<3.0
   1 of	>0.90),
   1 of	Amsterdam),
   1 of	Amsterdam.
   1 of	Analysis
   1 of	Characters
   1 of	Children
   1 of	Dutch
   1 of	Foods
   1 of	Recommendations
   1 of	Structural
   1 of	Technology,
   1 of	acute
   1 of	advertising.
   1 of	an
   1 of	any
   1 of	approximately
   1 of	approximation,
   1 of	character
   1 of	character-product
   1 of	child-directed
   1 of	children.
   1 of	commercialized
   1 of	embedded
   1 of	exposure
   1 of	fruit,
   1 of	healthy
   1 of	identification;
   1 of	influencer
   1 of	influencers
   1 of	integrated
   1 of	integration
   1 of	interest.
   1 of	kin.
   1 of	longitudinal
   1 of	national
   1 of	nationwide
   1 of	non-traditional
   1 of	overweight
   1 of	personally
   1 of	positive
   1 of	processing,
   1 of	product
   1 of	products
   1 of	review.
   1 of	scholarly
   1 of	screen-time
   1 of	self-report
   1 of	self-reported
   1 of	small
   1 of	standards
   1 of	such
   1 of	sugar-sweetened
   1 of	television
   1 of	this
   1 of	two
   1 of	videos
   1 of	vlogger
   1 of	which
   1 office	+
   1 often	do
   1 often	highly
   1 often	named
   1 often	not
   1 older	children
   1 on	YouTube?
   1 on	Young
   1 on	a
   1 on	advertising
   1 on	consumer
   1 on	dietary
   1 on	food
   1 on	impact
   1 on	intake
   1 on	longitudinal
   1 on	online
   1 on	other
   1 on	product
   1 on	responses
   1 on	social
   1 on	sugar
   1 on	that
   1 on	their
   1 on	youth’s
   1 one	can,
   1 one	of
   1 one	or
   1 one	recent
   1 online	consumers.
   1 online	vlogs.
   1 only	been
   1 only	observing
   1 onset	of
   1 open-access	article
   1 operationalized	as
   1 options	ranged
   1 or	2-year
   1 or	BeautyNezz”
   1 or	a
   1 or	bonbons,
   1 or	financial
   1 or	licorice,
   1 or	more
   1 or	more.
   1 or	package
   1 or	peanuts
   1 or	salty
   1 or	services
   1 origin	(>90%).
   1 original	author(s)
   1 original	publication
   1 other	environmental
   1 other	forums
   1 other	half
   1 other	longitudinal
   1 other	measures,
   1 our	findings
   1 over	time
   1 over	time.
   1 overweight	(i.e.,
   1 overweight	in
   1 overweight,	and
   1 owner(s)	are
   1 p-close	>0.05),
   1 package	of
   1 packaging,	see
   1 paradigms	of
   1 parameters	in
   1 parasocial	relationship
   1 parasocial	relationships,
   1 participants	were
   1 participants’	legal
   1 participate	from
   1 participate	in
   1 participated	in
   1 participation.	Collection
   1 particular	effect
   1 particularly	effective
   1 particularly	powerful
   1 past	decades,
   1 past	years
   1 path	models
   1 paths	for
   1 paths	leading
   1 patterns	are
   1 patterns	have
   1 patterns	observed
   1 patterns:	a
   1 pay	attention
   1 peanuts	they
   1 peer	influence
   1 peer	influences:
   1 people’s	processing
   1 per	day
   1 per	day.
   1 perceptions	and
   1 performed	by
   1 performed	the
   1 period,	nor
   1 period.	The
   1 permission	to
   1 permitted	which
   1 permitted,	provided
   1 personalities	(“influencers”)
   1 personally	familiar
   1 persuasive	appeals.
   1 phenomenon.	It
   1 phenomenon.	Moreover,
   1 pieces	(i.e.,
   1 place	during
   1 place	of
   1 plausible	that
   1 pm,	but
   1 point	toward
   1 points	between
   1 policies	regulating
   1 policy,	which
   1 popular	YouTube
   1 popular	platform
   1 popular	with
   1 popularity	on
   1 positive	associations
   1 possible	explanations
   1 potato	chips
   1 potential	conflict
   1 potential	deviations
   1 potential	explanation
   1 potentially	leading
   1 powerful	influence
   1 practice.	No
   1 pre-installed	research
   1 predicted	Unhealthy
   1 prerequisite	to
   1 present	study.
   1 presented	the
   1 presenting	all
   1 presents	all
   1 prevalence	of
   1 primary	school
   1 process	advertising
   1 processes	and
   1 processing	models
   1 processing	of
   1 processing,	food
   1 produced	a
   1 product	categories
   1 product	endorsements
   1 product	packaging,
   1 products	among
   1 products	in
   1 products	increases
   1 products	or
   1 products,	potentially
   1 products,	such
   1 products.	As
   1 products.	The
   1 products.	Watching
   1 profiles	and
   1 program	were
   1 programs	(Ofcom,
   1 programs	that
   1 project	(MyMovez,
   1 project	-
   1 project	on
   1 project	received
   1 project.	The
   1 promising	first
   1 promote	drinks
   1 promote	physical
   1 promote	unhealthy
   1 promote	young
   1 promote,	also
   1 promotion	and
   1 promotion	is
   1 promotion;	Buijzen
   1 pronounced	associations.
   1 protocol	(Bevelander
   1 protocol	mymovez
   1 provide	excellent
   1 provided	by
   1 provided	critical
   1 provided	on
   1 provided	the
   1 provides	a
   1 providing	a
   1 psychosocial,	and
   1 public	debate
   1 publication	in
   1 purchase	requests
   1 quantitative	research.
   1 question	regarding
   1 question	remains
   1 questionnaire,	and
   1 questionnaire:	i.
   1 questionnaires	assessed,
   1 questionnaires	at
   1 questions	about
   1 rabbit	or
   1 raises	fundamental
   1 raises	new
   1 random	time
   1 randomized	control
   1 range	0–3.63,
   1 range	0–4.00,
   1 range	0–4.19,
   1 range	0–4.25,
   1 range	0–4.75,
   1 range	0–5.00,
   1 ranged	between
   1 ranging	from
   1 rapidly	evolving
   1 rapidly	have
   1 ratio,	with
   1 reach	the
   1 received	daily
   1 received	ethical
   1 received	funding
   1 received	some
   1 received	the
   1 recent	randomized
   1 recognition	of
   1 recognize	it
   1 recruited	through
   1 reflect	their
   1 regard	to
   1 regarding	the
   1 regular	education
   1 regulating	new
   1 regulating	online
   1 regulations	and
   1 regulatory	systems
   1 relations	modeled.
   1 relationship	(e.g.,
   1 relationship	formation
   1 relationships	that
   1 relationships,	identify
   1 relative	validity
   1 relatively	low
   1 relatively	new
   1 relatively	unregulated.
   1 reliable	and
   1 remains	whether
   1 rendering	it
   1 reported	here
   1 represent	for
   1 represent	highly
   1 representative	of
   1 represented	about
   1 reproducibility	for
   1 reproduction	in
   1 reproduction	is
   1 requests	for
   1 research	application
   1 research	leading
   1 research	profiles
   1 research	systematically
   1 research	that
   1 research	was
   1 research.	CBE
   1 research.	Specifically,
   1 respond	on
   1 responses	(cf.
   1 responses	to
   1 restrictions.	Food
   1 resulted	in
   1 results	has
   1 results	were
   1 review	and
   1 review	board
   1 review.	TABLE
   1 reviewed	and
   1 reviewers'	affiliations
   1 revisions	and
   1 rhino	to
   1 robust	standard
   1 salt	(Coates
   1 salt	–
   1 salty	snacks,
   1 sample	used
   1 scale	as
   1 scale	ranging
   1 scholarly	interest,
   1 school	breaks.
   1 school	children
   1 school	children.
   1 school	hours,
   1 school-aged	children
   1 school-based	media
   1 schools	that
   1 schools.	After
   1 schools’	directors,
   1 screen-time	and
   1 second	version
   1 secondary	school
   1 secondary	schools
   1 see	De
   1 self-report	measure.
   1 self-report	measurement
   1 self-reported	advertising
   1 self-reported	water
   1 sell	a
   1 selling	of
   1 services	through
   1 seven	consecutive
   1 seven	or
   1 several	possible
   1 shift	in
   1 short-	and
   1 shorter	term
   1 should	strengthen
   1 shown	that
   1 shows	that,
   1 significant,	but
   1 significant.	Frequency
   1 significant.	TABLE
   1 significantly	predicted
   1 similar	need
   1 similar	to
   1 situation	at
   1 six	or
   1 size	analysis
   1 size	of
   1 small	(Maher
   1 small	cookies,
   1 smartphone	application,
   1 smartphone	with
   1 smartphone-administered	questionnaires
   1 snacks	consumption
   1 snacks	consumption.
   1 snacks)	that
   1 snacks,	and
   1 snacks,	dietary
   1 snacks,	is
   1 snacks.	Materials
   1 snacks.	Structural
   1 so	far
   1 social	media.
   1 social	network-based
   1 social	networks
   1 soda,	energy-,
   1 some	media
   1 sometimes	even
   1 specific	features
   1 specific	insight
   1 specific	media
   1 sponsoring	of
   1 sponsoring	social
   1 sports	drinks
   1 square	error
   1 stability	in
   1 standard	errors
   1 standards	for
   1 started	to
   1 step	(Van
   1 steps	in
   1 still	a
   1 still	be
   1 still	relatively
   1 stimulating	peer
   1 stimulus	materials
   1 story:	effect
   1 strategy	to
   1 strength	of
   1 strengthen	the
   1 strong	impact
   1 stronger	association,
   1 stronger	than
   1 structural	path
   1 structure	analysis:
   1 structures	and
   1 studied	dose-response
   1 studies	have
   1 studies	in
   1 studies	involving
   1 study	a
   1 study	design.
   1 study	on
   1 study	protocol
   1 study	reported
   1 study	suggest
   1 study	to
   1 study	took
   1 study	was
   1 study,	vlogs
   1 study.	Appetite
   1 study.	Arch.
   1 study.	At
   1 study.	Front.
   1 study.	Measures
   1 study.	Young
   1 submission.	Conflict
   1 submit?	+
   1 subsequent	year,
   1 such	experimental
   1 such	products
   1 sugar	syrup),
   1 sugar-sweetened	beverages,
   1 suggest	a
   1 supervision	of
   1 sweetened	fruit
   1 sweets	or
   1 syrup),	soda,
   1 systematic	comparison
   1 systematic	review
   1 systematically	varying
   1 systems	are
   1 taken	steps
   1 taking	the
   1 target	young
   1 targeted	at
   1 technique	involves
   1 television	advertising
   1 television	commercials.
   1 television	programs
   1 television	watching
   1 television,	“vlogs”
   1 term	(1
   1 term	(2
   1 term	formation
   1 term	relation
   1 terms	of
   1 terms.	*Correspondence:
   1 tested	in
   1 than	a
   1 than	for
   1 than	is
   1 that	a
   1 that	all
   1 that	channel.
   1 that	could
   1 that	familiarity
   1 that	followed
   1 that	for
   1 that	has
   1 that	have
   1 that	is,
   1 that	might
   1 that	more
   1 that	needs
   1 that	none
   1 that	should
   1 that	sponsoring
   1 that	started
   1 that	they
   1 that	they)
   1 that	were
   1 that	when
   1 that	“one
   1 that,	similar
   1 the	(full-information)
   1 the	2009
   1 the	Creative
   1 the	Dutch
   1 the	ERC’s
   1 the	Family
   1 the	Impact
   1 the	Lives
   1 the	Marketing
   1 the	PCMC-Model:
   1 the	Research
   1 the	Springs
   1 the	absence
   1 the	academic
   1 the	aim
   1 the	analyses
   1 the	analyses.
   1 the	basic
   1 the	behavior.
   1 the	behaviors
   1 the	capacity
   1 the	character
   1 the	characteristics
   1 the	child-influencer
   1 the	childhood
   1 the	context
   1 the	copyright
   1 the	dataset
   1 the	debate
   1 the	effectiveness
   1 the	eight
   1 the	existing
   1 the	few
   1 the	final
   1 the	first
   1 the	five
   1 the	following
   1 the	food-related
   1 the	formula:
   1 the	frequency
   1 the	great
   1 the	host
   1 the	impact,
   1 the	influencer
   1 the	items
   1 the	large
   1 the	largest
   1 the	latest
   1 the	literature
   1 the	long
   1 the	longer
   1 the	main
   1 the	manuscript
   1 the	manuscript.
   1 the	model,
   1 the	online
   1 the	onset
   1 the	participants’
   1 the	patterns
   1 the	phenomenon.
   1 the	place
   1 the	present
   1 the	processes
   1 the	promotion
   1 the	public
   1 the	questionnaire,
   1 the	research
   1 the	results
   1 the	schools’
   1 the	second
   1 the	short-
   1 the	shorter
   1 the	smartphone
   1 the	social
   1 the	specific
   1 the	story:
   1 the	study,
   1 the	study.
   1 the	subsequent
   1 the	terms
   1 the	three
   1 the	traditional
   1 the	various
   1 the	vlog
   1 the	weekend.
   1 their	Loop
   1 their	attitudes
   1 their	food
   1 their	schools.
   1 their	situation
   1 themselves	to
   1 themselves,	and
   1 themselves,	may
   1 themselves.	During
   1 then,	knowledge
   1 these	mechanisms
   1 these	results
   1 these	terms.
   1 these	unhealthy
   1 these	vlogs
   1 these	vlogs;
   1 thesis,	Amsterdam:
   1 they	consumed
   1 they	did
   1 they	extend
   1 they	promote,
   1 they	trust
   1 they)	watched
   1 this	direction,
   1 this	is
   1 this	journal
   1 this	makes
   1 this	new
   1 this	shift
   1 this	study
   1 those	early
   1 though	there
   1 through	social
   1 through	their
   1 time	and
   1 time	points
   1 time	to
   1 time.	Figure
   1 timing	of
   1 to	12-year-olds,
   1 to	3.21,
   1 to	7
   1 to	Children.
   1 to	T2
   1 to	T3
   1 to	Unhealthy
   1 to	a
   1 to	access
   1 to	address.
   1 to	advertise
   1 to	advertising
   1 to	affect
   1 to	celebrity
   1 to	children.
   1 to	consume:
   1 to	decisive
   1 to	enduring
   1 to	evolve.
   1 to	find
   1 to	food
   1 to	increase
   1 to	influence
   1 to	instruct
   1 to	investigate
   1 to	its
   1 to	measure
   1 to	media
   1 to	pay
   1 to	process
   1 to	reach
   1 to	recognize
   1 to	regulations
   1 to	school-based
   1 to	sell
   1 to	target
   1 to	these
   1 to	this
   1 to	traditional
   1 to	unhealthy
   1 to	vlogs
   1 to	what
   1 to	will
   1 took	place
   1 topics	*
   1 total	bans
   1 total	of
   1 total	views
   1 toward	a
   1 toward	brand
   1 toward	the
   1 tracking	bracelet
   1 traditional	advertising,
   1 traditional	advertising.
   1 traditional	forms
   1 traditional	media-based
   1 trial	providing
   1 trial.	Appetite
   1 trial.	Front.
   1 trigger	particularly
   1 trust	and
   1 two	structural
   1 types	+
   1 under	supervision
   1 underlying	the
   1 underweight,	16.3%
   1 unhealthy	drinks
   1 unhealthy	food
   1 unhealthy	foods
   1 unhealthy	products
   1 unhealthy	products,
   1 unhealthy	snacks
   1 units)	of
   1 unregulated.	Thereby,
   1 used	longitudinal
   1 used	to
   1 using	Mplus
   1 using	animated
   1 using	the
   1 using	vlogs
   1 valid	estimate
   1 validation	of
   1 validity	and
   1 validity	of
   1 values	and
   1 van	Dommelen,
   1 van	Staveren,
   1 van	Woudenberg
   1 van	Woudenberg^1,
   1 variety	of
   1 various	forms
   1 varying	the
   1 vegetable,	and
   1 versus	new
   1 via	DANS
   1 via	simple
   1 video	content
   1 video	environment
   1 video	weblogs)
   1 videos	from
   1 videos	of
   1 videos	targeted
   1 viewing	time
   1 views	*
   1 vlog	content,
   1 vlog-based	advertising
   1 vlogger	popularity
   1 vloggers	and
   1 vloggers	on
   1 vloggers	such
   1 vloggers.	Finally,
   1 vloggers’	influence
   1 vlogs	(video
   1 vlogs	are
   1 vlogs	has
   1 vlogs	in
   1 vlogs	influenced
   1 vlogs	is
   1 vlogs	rapidly
   1 vlogs	that
   1 vlogs	the
   1 vlogs	to
   1 vlogs	were
   1 vlogs,	and
   1 vlogs,	social
   1 vlogs,	they
   1 vlogs.	As
   1 vlogs.	Conclusion
   1 vlogs:	an
   1 vlogs;	that
   1 was	assessed
   1 was	being
   1 was	captured
   1 was	comparable
   1 was	conducted
   1 was	constructed
   1 was	obtained
   1 was	operationalized
   1 was	performed
   1 was	provided
   1 was	related
   1 was	representative
   1 was	used
   1 watch	vlogs
   1 watched	more
   1 watched	vlogs
   1 watching	a
   1 watching	behaviour
   1 watching	online
   1 watching	television
   1 watching	with
   1 water	consumption:
   1 water	intake
   1 waves	children
   1 way	for
   1 wealth:	validation
   1 weblogs)	by
   1 weblogs)?	Think
   1 weekend.	This
   1 weight	(70.4%),
   1 weight	in
   1 well	(Lee
   1 well	as
   1 were	asked
   1 were	eligible
   1 were	estimated
   1 were	exposed
   1 were	extremely
   1 were	girls.
   1 were	less
   1 were	non-significant.
   1 were	not
   1 were	of
   1 were	overweight,
   1 were	recruited
   1 were	represented
   1 were	reviewed
   1 were	significant,
   1 were	still
   1 were	underweight,
   1 were	used
   1 what	animated
   1 when	children
   1 where	beverages
   1 whether	this
   1 which	also
   1 which	assumes
   1 which	does
   1 which	involves
   1 which	is
   1 which	may
   1 which	the
   1 while	the
   1 who	have
   1 who	watched
   1 whom	older
   1 whom	they
   1 why	the
   1 will	defend
   1 will	yield
   1 with	1-year
   1 with	accepted
   1 with	character
   1 with	characters
   1 with	children:
   1 with	cue-reactivity
   1 with	eating
   1 with	higher
   1 with	individual,
   1 with	non-familiar
   1 with	one
   1 with	popular
   1 with	regard
   1 with	robust
   1 with	social
   1 with	these
   1 with	whom
   1 without	restrictions.
   1 witnessed	considerable
   1 wrapped	cookies,
   1 written	consent
   1 www.desocialcode.nl	References
   1 www.frontiersin.org	Figure
   1 year	period,
   1 year,	but
   1 year;	from
   1 years	(M
   1 years	participated
   1 years	vlogs
   1 years;	from
   1 yet,	the
   1 yield	more
   1 yielded	an
   1 you	watch
   1 young	adolescents.
   1 young	audiences
   1 young	children
   1 young	children,
   1 young	children.
   1 young	children’s
   1 young	people’s
   1 younger	children
   1 your	manuscript
   1 youth’s	healthy
   1 youth’s	social
   1 z-BMI	was
   1 zero	glasses
   1 |	CiteScore
   1 |	https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02975
   1 ©	2020
   1 ›	Frontiers
   1 –	Radboud
   1 –	consumption
   1 −2.69	to
   1 “How	often
   1 “Reliability	and
   1 “The	Social
   1 “Wearable	Lab”
   1 χ^2/df	ratio,
   1 “one	glass”
   1 “vlogs”	(i.e.,
   1 0.04,	p-close
   1 0.05,	p-close
   1 0.17,	SD
   1 0.55;	T2:
   1 0.59,	SD
   1 0.591,	CFI
   1 0.62,	SD
   1 0.62;	T2:
   1 0.64.	Consumption
   1 0.647,	CFI
   1 0.65,	SD
   1 0.68,	SD
   1 0.69,	SD
   1 0.69.	Control
   1 0.70;	T3:
   1 0.71,	SD
   1 0.72;	T3:
   1 0.90,	χ^2/df
   1 0.93,	χ^2/df
   1 0.97).	Boys
   1 0–3.63,	M
   1 0–4.00,	M
   1 0–4.19,	M
   1 0–4.25,	M
   1 0–4.75,	M
   1 0–5.00,	M
   1 1	=
   1 1	depicts
   1 1	presents
   1 1	year
   1 1-year	intervals
   1 1.	Analytical
   1 1.	Results
   1 1.	^
   1 1.08;	Schönbeck
   1 1.39.	Consumption
   1 1.52;	T2:
   1 1.55;	T3:
   1 1.79	Table
   1 1.84).	Results
   1 1.88.	Table
   1 1–13,	M
   1 1–55.	doi:
   1 2	www.frontiersin.org
   1 2,	presenting
   1 2-year	period.
   1 2.	Results
   1 2.	^
   1 2.067	|
   1 3	days
   1 3	days:
   1 3.2	More
   1 3.21,	M
   1 3.29,	SD
   1 3.44,	SD
   1 3.66,	SD
   1 5.3%	were
   1 6,	1–55.
   1 6-point	scale
   1 6:e27608.	doi:
   1 7	=
   1 7.8%	were
   1 7:00	am
   1 7:30	pm,
   1 8.3,	one
   1 8.54,	SD
   1 9,	244–250.
   1 9,	26–31.
   1 10.05;	SD
   1 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1407	PubMed
   1 10.1007/s11002-015-9363-0	CrossRef
   1 10.1007/s11205-005-1607-6	CrossRef
   1 10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.006	PubMed
   1 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.011	PubMed
   1 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.11.016	CrossRef
   1 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171	CrossRef
   1 10.1037/hea0000691	PubMed
   1 10.1079/PHN2005847	PubMed
   1 10.1080/08874417.2017.1400929	CrossRef
   1 10.1080/10705519909540118	CrossRef
   1 10.1080/10810730.2010.529487	PubMed
   1 10.1080/10810730.2011.650833	PubMed
   1 10.1080/15213269.2011.620540	CrossRef
   1 10.1089/chi.2018.0037	PubMed
   1 10.1108/YC-12-2018-0896	CrossRef
   1 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01370	CrossRef
   1 10.1186/s12889-018-5353-5	PubMed
   1 10.1186/s12889-018-5698-9	PubMed
   1 10.1371/journal.pone.0027608	PubMed
   1 10.1542/peds.2016-1758K	PubMed
   1 10.17026/dans-zz9-gn44.	Ethics
   1 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02142	PubMed
   1 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02913	CrossRef
   1 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02975	Received:
   1 10.3945/ajcn.115.120022	PubMed
   1 10:2142.	doi:
   1 10:2913.	doi:
   1 10:2975.	doi:
   1 11,	2019).
   1 12	Articles
   1 12	years
   1 12,	345–351.
   1 12-year-old	children,
   1 12-year-old	children’s
   1 12-year-olds,	Opree
   1 14	September
   1 14,	280–290.
   1 14,	333–354.
   1 15	years
   1 16	December
   1 16,	79–89.
   1 16.3%	were
   1 17,	1068–1080.
   1 18:504.	doi:
   1 18:753.	doi:
   1 20,	2019).
   1 20,	427–450.
   1 20,	77–90.
   1 25–54.	Google
   1 26,	S37–S34.
   1 26–31.	doi:
   1 27,	553–567.
   1 37,	1159–1167.
   1 50,	231–239.
   1 52.5%	were
   1 60,	76–84.
   1 69,	5753–5760.
   1 76–84.	doi:
   1 77–90.	doi:
   1 78,	473–487.
   1 79–89.	doi:
   1 103,	294–301.
   1 103,	519–533.
   1 140,	S97–S101.
   1 166,	465–472.
   1 200	ml.
   1 231–239.	doi:
   1 244–250.	doi:
   1 280–290.	doi:
   1 294–301.	doi:
   1 333–354.	doi:
   1 345–351.	doi:
   1 427–450.	doi:
   1 453	8-
   1 453	primary
   1 465–472.	doi:
   1 473–487.	doi:
   1 519–533.	doi:
   1 553–567.	doi:
   1 953	primary
   1 1068–1080.	doi:
   1 1159–1167.	doi:
   1 1980,	1997
   1 1997	and
   1 1997;	Bevelander
   1 1999;	Kline,
   1 2006)	(range
   1 2009	health
   1 2009.	PLoS
   1 2010)	and
   1 2010).	As
   1 2010).	Vlogs
   1 2010;	Boyland
   1 2010;	Rozendaal
   1 2011),	it
   1 2011),	this
   1 2011).	FIGURE
   1 2011).	Family
   1 2011,	2012)
   1 2012)	also
   1 2012),	occur
   1 2012).	It
   1 2012;	Kapitan
   1 2013),	which
   1 2014).	T1:
   1 2016	(T1),
   1 2016).	Even
   1 2016).	Moreover,
   1 2016).	Similar
   1 2016,	2018;
   1 2016;	Lee
   1 2016;	Robinson
   1 2017	(T2),
   1 2017).	Due
   1 2017).	Research
   1 2018	(T3).
   1 2018	for
   1 2018).	A
   1 2018).	These
   1 2018).	Via
   1 2018).	We
   1 2018;	Bevelander
   1 2018;	Folkvord
   1 2019),	a
   1 2019).	Comparing
   1 2019).	Consumption
   1 2019).	Rather
   1 2019).	This
   1 2019).	Vlogs
   1 2019;	Accepted:
   1 2019;	Folkvord
   1 2019;	Published:
   1 2020	Smit,
   1 2020	|
   1 2020).	As
   1 2020.	Edited
   1 5753–5760.	doi:
   1 Inf.	Syst.
   1 Influencers	in
   1 influence	children.
   1 influence	mechanisms
   1 influenced	consumption
   1 influencer	food
   1 influencer	improved
   1 influencer	marketing
   1 influencer	marketing,
   1 influencer	marketing.
   1 influencers	and
   1 influencers	as
   1 influencers	in
   1 influencers	is
   1 influencers	may
   1 influencers	popular
   1 influencers	raises
   1 influencers	represent
   1 influencers	that
   1 influencers	themselves,
   1 influencers	under
   1 influencers	was
   1 influencers,	sugar-sweetened
   1 influencers.	Several
   1 influences:	study
   1 informed	consent