HS2 delays: High speed rail needs major rethink as costs spiral 'out of control', Lords report warns
'The north is being short-changed by the government’s present plans'
The costs of the High Speed 2 (HS2) rail project to connect London with the Midlands and the North of England “appear to be out of control,” according to a House of Lords report.
The first phase of HS2, linking London with Birmingham, has a budget of £56bn and is due to open in 2026.
The chair of the Economic Affairs Committee, Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, said: “If costs overrun on the first phase of the project, there could be insufficient funding for the rest of the new railway.”
In a new report, Rethinking High Speed 2, the committee says the priority for investment in the rail network should be the north of England.
The former chairman of HS2, Sir Terry Morgan, told the Committee that “nobody knows” what the final costs of the project will be.
First look inside the new Caledonian Sleeper train
First look inside the new Caledonian Sleeper train
1/6
2/6
3/6
4/6
5/6
6/6
1/6
2/6
3/6
4/6
5/6
6/6
Launching the report, Lord Forsyth said: “Commuter services in the north of England are badly overcrowded and reliant on ageing trains.
“Rail connections between northern cities are poor. Rail infrastructure in the north should be the government’s priority for investment, rather than improving north-south links which are already good.”
“The north is being short-changed by the government’s present plans, especially as construction on HS2 is starting in the south.
“The northern sections of High Speed 2 must not be sacrificed to make up for overspending on the railway’s southern sections.”
Four years ago the committee urged the government to consider whether improving links in the north of England would be a better investment than HS2. It also recommended reducing the cost of HS2, such as lowering the speed of the railway or terminating in west London rather than Euston.
The committee includes two former chancellors of the Exchequer, a former cabinet secretary and former permanent secretaries to the Treasury and the Foreign Office.
Ahead of the report, the rail minister, Andrew Jones, told The Independent: “We will overcome some of the capacity problems with a variety of different measures. Digital signalling, longer trains and constructing new lines. And HS2 is a key part of that.”
Mr Jones is MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough, and chaired the Northern Electrification Taskforce.
“I took the HS2 bill through the house, I’m a big supporter of HS2 and I want to see it happen,” he said. “As it develops, I think people will realise it will make a step change for journeys around our country.”
There is growing political opposition to the high speed rail project. Potential Tory leaders including Boris Johnson, Esther McVey and Andrea Leadsom have all spoken out against HS2.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.