HS2: Supreme Court rejects legal challenge by opponents of high-speed rail line
The seven Supreme Court Justices voted unanimously against the claims
The Supreme Court rejected on Tuesday a legal challenge to the Government’s plan to push through the HS2 rail link.
Groups including the the HS2 Action Alliance, Heathrow Hub campaigners, and local councils where the proposed route crosses, put forward claims that the project's decision-making process was unlawful.
The court ruled against two accusations that the Government was “cutting corners” to introduce the project and was in breach of two European environmental directives for assessing the project's environmental impact.
The seven Supreme Court justices ruled unanimously against the challenge, and said: “There is no reason to suppose that MPs will be unable properly to examine and debate the proposed project.”
There is also no justification for referring the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the judges ruled.
David Elvin QC, representing HS2AA, told the court at a hearing in October that the case concerned “the most important strategic rail decision this country has taken at least for a generation”.
He said that the Government had so far failed to consult as widely as it had promised and to consider properly alternatives to HS2, and failed to convince judges to overturn an appeal court majority upholding the scheme.
While the claims cannot be appealed in Europe, there may be future challenges on the second phase of the scheme, which extends beyond Birmingham, when the exact route is announced.
Transport Minister Baroness Kramer said of the verdict: “We welcome that the Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the appeal, which addressed technical issues that had no bearing on the need for a new north-south railway.
”The Government's handling of the project has been fully vindicated by the highest court in the land.
“We will now continue to press ahead with the delivery of HS2.
”HS2 is also essential in helping rebalance UK growth - bringing greater prosperity to the Midlands and the North - and we are continuing with the crucial business of getting the scheme ready for construction in 2017.“
After the announcement Emma Crane, campaign director of the HS2 Alliance, said: ”We are very disappointed, but it is absolutely not the end of the road. We believe this is a wrong decision.“
The ÂŁ50bn project will potentially see trains run at 250 mph (400km/h) from London to Birmingham from 2026, and is planned to branch to Manchester and Leeds by 2032.
Additional reporting by PA
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.