Skip to main content (BUTTON) Menu Times Higher Education (THE) * * * * Professional + News + Opinion + Reader Comments + Books + Features + Awards + Digital Editions * Jobs + Find a job + Jobs by email + Search recruiters + Careers advice * Summits * Rankings + World University Rankings + US College rankings + Japan University Rankings + By subject + News + About * Student + Best universities + Where to study + News + Advice + Blogs + Find a University + Subjects * About Us * * * (BUTTON) × Please log in * * * * or E-mail or username * ____________________________________________________________ Password * ____________________________________________________________ (Log in) Log in Not a member yet? Join us for FREE Forgotten Password? (BUTTON) ×Close Register now for free * * * * or Choose your profile * [You are a ...___________] Email * ____________________________________________________________ A valid e-mail address. All e-mails from the system will be sent to this address. The e-mail address is not made public and will only be used if you wish to receive a new password or wish to receive certain news or notifications by e-mail. Password ____________________________________________________________ Username * _______________________________________________________________________ Newsletters [X] Higher education updates from the THE editorial team [X] World University Rankings news [ ] If you do not wish to be contacted about offers, products or services from THE/TES Global then please check this box (Join us) Join us By registering, you agree to our cookie policy and terms and conditions. Already have a THE account? Log in now * Login * Register * Subscribe * Share on twitter * Share on facebook * Share on google * Share on whatsapp * 1 ____________________________________________________________ (GO) GO Plagiarism software can be beaten by simple tech tricks IT scholar says PDF tweaks allow students' copied work to evade detection. Hannah Fearn reports January 20, 2011 * Share on twitter * Share on facebook * Share on linkedin * Share on whatsapp * Share on mail * 1 to write students’ assessed essays in return for cash Source: iStock Technological loopholes allow savvy students to beat academic plagiarism software, an IT expert has warned. James Heather, senior lecturer in computing at the University of Surrey, has revealed that plagiarism detection systems such as Turnitin that are routinely used by universities are open to simple cheats allowing students to evade detection when submitting copied material. The software works by extracting text from an essay or assignment and checking whether it matches text from other sources, such as documents available online. But in a new paper, "Turnitoff: identifying and fixing a hole in current plagiarism detection software", Dr Heather reveals that beating the system is simple. "In their current incarnation, one can easily create a document that passes the plagiarism check regardless of how much copied material it contains. When there are loopholes that can be exploited, they give the operator a false assurance that a submission is original." The study, which appears in the journal Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, demonstrates ways in which students can modify plagiarised work to avoid detection. "If we can stop the text from being properly extracted from the document, without affecting how the document looks and prints, then the software will not be able to identify any plagiarised material," Dr Heather writes. Students aware of this loophole could get around the system by converting a plagiarised essay to PDF format, he says, and then altering the corresponding "character map" - a map of the sequence of characters used in the text. Although the text would remain visually unaltered, extracts tested by the plagiarism software would be garbled, and so matches would not be detected. Or, he says, students could rearrange character codes, or "glyphs", in the PDF so they no longer correspond to the alphabet and "the link between the text and its printed representation will be broken". In this scenario a tutor could print out and read the essay, but the computer running the detection software would scan nonsense. Finally, students could convert text into a series of Bezier curves to represent the shape of letters rather than using the characters themselves. "If there is no text, then the plagiarism detection cannot function," the paper notes. Dr Heather argues that requiring students to submit work in Microsoft Word is not a solution to the problem; students could simply convert a doctored PDF into Word. Instead, he says, universities should supplement detection systems with a secondary optical character recognition (OCR) program. "The only reliable way to make certain that the extracted text matches what is represented on the printed page is to use OCR," the paper concludes. Such a system attempts to "do the same thing as the human reader of the submission: take a rendered copy of the work and interpret the marks that appear on the page. This immediately counters all attempts to alter the internals of the document." This method places a burden on a university's server, costing time and money. But free OCR software is available and universities should make use of it, Dr Heather says. A spokesman for Turnitin said the cheating methods required a high level of technical skill but the company is working to detect when tricks have been used. hannah.fearn@tsleducation.com. Man photocopying a book Students ‘don’t understand’ plagiarism, research suggests Read more You've reached your article limit. Register to continue Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus: * Sign up for the editor's highlights * Receive World University Rankings news first * Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches * Participate in reader discussions and post comments Register Subscribe Or subscribe for unlimited access to: * Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews * Digital editions * Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis * Unrestricted access to the UK and global edition of the THE app on IOS, Android and Kindle Fire [image-ipad.png] Subscribe Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now Related articles Man photocopying a book Students ‘don’t understand’ plagiarism, research suggests August 15, 2016 Reader's comments (1) #1 Submitted by beenie on December 2, 2016 - 12:14am When it comes to budget, which is known as “a target for costs or revenue that a firm or department must aim to reach over a given period of time” (Marcouse, 2015). It means that budget is a financial process to prepare for the business which are expected for the given period of time Have your say Log in or register to post comments Featured Jobs [] Corporate Events Agent Durham University [] Digital Marketing Manager Staffordshire University [] Co-ordinator Technische Universitat Dresden (tu Dresden) [] Senior Lecturer / Lecturer I / Lecturer II - English Language and Literature Hong Kong Baptist University [] Heilbronn Research Fellowships in Data Science University Of Bristol See all jobs Most Viewed Woman behind man playing bagpipes Women ‘more likely to be pressured to add authors’ to papers January 2, 2018 Most beautiful universities in the UK The 10 most beautiful universities in the UK January 1, 2018 Boardroom Appointment of Toby Young to Office for Students board criticised January 1, 2018 University of Oxford, University Church of St Mary the Virgin Best universities in the UK September 5, 2017 Best universities in Canada 2018 Best universities in Canada September 5, 2017 Looking for the next step in your career? Job title, keywords or company name ____________________________________________________________ Location ____________________________________________________________ (Search Jobs) Search Jobs Most Commented Broken down, ineffective, broken, not working, car Scientific peer review: an ineffective and unworthy... Les Hatton and Gregory Warr give their two-pronged solution to the problems of peer review Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (7 December 2017) The REF is wrong: books are not inferior to papers Monographs typically constitute a scholar’s greatest achievement, but REF strategists discourage their production, says Bruce Macfarlane Machiavelli jumping over a horse A Machiavellian guide to getting ahead in academia Rogier Creemers advises early career academics to be ruthless and put themselves first to move up the ladder Stephen Bax Stephen Bax, 1960-2017 Academic whose research interests were shaped by an African childhood remembered Christina Slade Departing Bath Spa v-c paid £808K in final year University defends £429,000 pay-off to Christina Slade as criticism of ‘excessive’ executive pay intensifies Tweets by @timeshighered * Contact Us * About Us * Write for the THE * Terms & Conditions * Cookie Policy Times Higher Education subscriptions Subscribe If you like what you're reading online, why not take advantage of our subscription and get unlimited access to all of Times Higher Education's content? You'll get full access to our website, print and digital editions, and the Times Higher Education app for iOS, Android and Kindle Fire devices. Subscribe [?pid=10648&sg=DeUr-8da6f5e5]