#Metro News Skip to Article Cleveland.com (BUTTON) (BUTTON) Menu * Home * * News (BUTTON) open * Politics (BUTTON) open * Local News (BUTTON) open * Opinion (BUTTON) open * Business (BUTTON) open * Sports (BUTTON) open * High School Sports (BUTTON) open * Entertainment (BUTTON) open * Obituaries * Jobs * Autos * Real Estate (BUTTON) open * Rentals (BUTTON) open * Videos (BUTTON) open * Photos (BUTTON) open * Akron News * Place an Ad * Classifieds (BUTTON) open * Find&Save * Local Businesses (BUTTON) open * Follow Us (BUTTON) open * Subscribe (BUTTON) * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Metro * The Plain Dealer * Weather * Health & Medical * Crime * Data Central * Columnists (BUTTON) open * City Club of Cleveland * Courts * Nation * World * Special Reports (BUTTON) open * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Mark Naymik * Michael McIntyre * Phillip Morris * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * A Greater Cleveland * A Critical Choice: Nursing home care * At Any (Court) Cost * Cleveland's Bike Life * Heroins Human Toll * Justice for All: Bail reform * Know the RX: Opioid addiction resources * Recovering Hope * Remaking The Q * Stolen in the Suburbs * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * State Politics * National Politics & Elections * Cleveland City Hall * Cuyahoga County Insider * Special Report: Ohio Matters * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Akron * Beachwood * Berea * Brecksville * Brunswick * Chagrin Falls * Cleveland Heights * Hillcrest * Lakewood * Lyndhurst-South Euclid * Medina * Parma * Shaker Heights * Solon * Strongsville * Westlake * More East Side * More West Side * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Letters to the Editor * Jeff Darcy's Cartoons * More columnists * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Real Estate * Energy * Consumer Affairs * Personal Finance * Top Workplaces * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Browns * Indians * Cavaliers * Ohio State * Big 10 & Recruiting * College * Columns (BUTTON) open * Monsters * Golf * Horse Racing * Outdoors * Sports Insider * Videos (BUTTON) open * Photos * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Doug Lesmerises * Bill Livingston * Dennis Manoloff * Terry Pluto * Bud Shaw * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Cleveland Browns Videos * Cleveland Cavaliers Videos * Cleveland Indians Videos * Ohio State Football Videos * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Boys Ice Hockey * Girls Gymnastics * Boys Basketball * Girls Basketball * Wrestling * Boys Bowling * Girls Bowling * Boys Swimming * Girls Swimming * Football * Off Season Sports (BUTTON) open * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Baseball * Softball * Boys Track and Field * Girls Track and Field * Girls Volleyball * Boys Lacrosse * Girls Lacrosse * Boys Tennis * Girls Tennis * Boys Cross Country * Girls Cross Country * Field Hockey * Boys Golf * Girls Golf * Boys Soccer * Girls Soccer * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Food/Dining (BUTTON) open * Best Of * Events * Movies * Music * TV * Books * Arts * Theater * Friday! * People * Living * Travel * Style * Essential CLE * Comics * Crossword & Puzzles * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Dining Guide * Bars * Cooking * Top Restaurants * Drinks * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Homes * New Homes * Rent * Foreclosures * Commercial * Home Remodeling * Place an Ad * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * All Rentals * Apartments & Communities * Commercial Leases * Place an Ad * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * cleveland.com Videos * Cleveland Browns Videos * Cleveland Cavaliers Videos * Cleveland Indians Videos * Ohio State Football Videos * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * cleveland.com Photos * Community Photos * Submit Your Photos * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Pets * For Sale * Garage Sales * Celebrations * Fraud Prevention * Manage Your Ad * Place an Ad * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Find A Business * Food & Dining * Retail Shopping * Health & Medicine * Personal Care * Entertainment * Real Estate * Automotive * Claim Your Business * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * Visit our Facebook Page * Follow us on Twitter * Visit us on Google Plus * (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu * The Plain Dealer * Sun News * Media Insider Rewards (BUTTON) (BUTTON) Back to Main Menu (BUTTON) Close Customize Your Weather Set Your Location: Enter City and State or Zip Code Congratulations! Your weather is set to . You can change the location at any time. [BUTTON Input] (not implemented)____ AccuWeather.com Quick Look (BUTTON) Change your current location » View Full Weather Report (BUTTON) Search (BUTTON) Account Sign In Close Sign in to Cleveland.com User Profile You are signed in as Edit Public Profile Sign Out (BUTTON) Subscribe * The Plain Dealer * Sun News * Media Insider Rewards 1. Metro News Lawmakers, advocates bicker over updated regulations for nursing homes: A Critical Choice Updated November 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM; Posted November 26, 2017 at 6:03 AM Some members of Congress are urging federal officials to re-evaluate care standards for nursing homes, saying some of the measures are excessive. Advocates disagree, saying the regulations are vital to residents in the nation's more than 15,000 care centers. Some members of Congress are urging federal officials to re-evaluate care standards for nursing homes, saying some of the measures are excessive. Advocates disagree, saying the regulations are vital to residents in the nation's more than 15,000 care centers. (Lisa DeJong/The Plain Dealer) (BUTTON) Comment By John Caniglia & Jo Ellen Corrigan, The Plain Dealer jcaniglia@plaind.com CLEVELAND, Ohio - Federal regulations designed to protect residents in the nation's nursing homes are facing mounting pressure from Congress. A group of 146 lawmakers has urged federal government officials to re-evaluate revised standards in care centers, claiming some of the measures are excessive and are financial burdens for facility owners. Advocates for residents have blasted the move. They said the regulations are needed, as the measures will expand care plans, offer greater freedom for residents, increase the amount of training for nurses and aides caring for residents with dementia and provide grievance officers to help handle complaints. "This is a very concerted effort to undermine the basic protections for residents of nursing homes," said Richard Mollot, the executive director of the Long Term Care Community Coalition, a national nonprofit based in New York City that aims to improve the care of residents in nursing homes. A vast majority of the nation's more than 15,000 nursing homes accept some form of Medicare or Medicaid. To obtain it, the facilities must comply with the regulations in the Nursing Home Reform Law. The law went into effect in 1991. Last year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services revised the regulations, the first reworking of the standards in 25 years. Some of the changes went into effect last year, and others are to be completed over the next two years. While advocates lauded the revisions, many owners of nursing homes and the industry's lobby said the revisions went too far. They cited the hundreds of changes required, and said that facilities can't possibly make them in the next few years. Last month, 122 members of the House and 24 members of the Senate signed letters urging Eric Hargan, the acting secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and Seema Verma, the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, to re-evaluate the revised guidelines. They stressed the safety of residents, but also flexibility and understanding for the facility's owners. The letters backed the stance of the nursing home industry, which also urged that the measures be delayed. The industry contributed more than $2.5 million to the campaigns of 128 lawmakers who signed the letters, according to the website FollowTheMoney .org, which trackspolitical contributions. Regulations "too sweeping" Jim Renacci, the House Republican from Wadsworth who was elected in 2011, balked at the hint of influence. He said the changes that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services made were "too sweeping." Renacci owned more than 20 nursing homes in Ohio before selling them in about 2000. "It's ridiculous," said Renacci, who is running for Ohio governor in the May primary. "You have Washington bureaucrats telling nursing home owners how to find a set of lost dentures. The regulations need to be more efficient and flexible. You can't have someone 1,000 miles away dictating how something must be done in a nursing home." Advocates disagree. They said the government's revisions simply updated the regulations. They also cited The Plain Dealer's series, A Critical Choice, as proof of problems in many nursing homes. The newspaper reported earlier this year that two of every five nursing homes in Ohio delivered care that federal guidelines deemed substandard in 2015, the most recent year available for the data. The newspaper also found that 70 percent of the state's nursing homes were staffed below what researchers say is the level needed to provide safe, compassionate care. The changes in the standards offer greater focus on residents' safety and well-being, according to the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long Term Care, an advocacy organization in Washington, D.C. For instance, says the organization, the changes: * Would stress greater residents' freedoms in choice, from food selection to daily schedules, such as when to go to bed and when to wake up. Also, visitors can stop by at any time. * Require nursing homes to perform a baseline care assessment within 48 hours of a resident's arrival. The plan sets out initial goals for residents, including physician and dietary orders. Under the previous regulations, nursing homes could take up to three weeks to develop a care plan. * Include a grievance officer at each facility, who would handle complaints of residents and families. An infection prevention specialist would be added as well. This would not require an additional hire, as a nurse on staff, with increased training, could be assigned the position. * Add enhanced training for nurses' aides to deal with residents suffering from dementia. "Of course, not all nursing homes are bad, but we have a serious quality problem in many of them," said Charlene Harrington, a professor emeritus of nursing at the University of California at San Francisco who has studied the nation's nursing homes for years. "We have a lot of substandard nursing homes. We have complaints. There are deaths. There is abuse," she said. "And what we need are more regulations, not less." Staffing levels are a primary area of concern. Advocates for nursing home residents have pushed for years for the CMS to come up with specific regulations for nursing homes regarding the number of nurses and nurse's aides needed per shift. The nursing home industry has fought that, claiming each home is different, and the levels of necessary care differ greatly. The revisions also don't address the per-shift staffing issue for nurses. They leave it up to the nursing homes to make an assessment to "assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychological well-being of each resident." Renacci and his fellow lawmakers urged a re-evaluation that would alleviate regulatory and financial burdens on nursing home owners. Many of the changes, lawmakers said, are micromanaging in nature, such as the proper way to dispose of trash and the tracking of complaints. They said the regulations, in some cases, pull nursing home administrators away from caring for residents. "Though well-intentioned, these changes may instead have the opposite effect and direct resources away from the quality care our patients deserve," the letter from House members said. Lawmakers estimate that the revised regulations could cost $62,900 per facility initially. Added together, it would cost the nation's nursing homes $831 million, they said. "As you are aware, many skilled-nursing facilities -- particularly those serving rural and under-served areas -- operate on thin financial margins, which is why providers in our states have indicated they will struggle to implement the rule," the letter from senators said. Advocates, however, said they believe the owners of the care centers nursing homes will face little, if any, struggle to pay for the regulations. Partisan support against regulations Renacci said he had wide support on the issue from members in the House, including David Joyce of Painesville and seven other GOP members from Ohio. Those House members are Steve Stivers of Hilliard, Patrick Tiberi of Worthington, Bill Johnson of Cambridge, Robert Latta of Bowling Green, Jim Jordan of Lima, Warren Davidson of Dayton, and Brad Wenstrup of Cincinnati. Joyce declined to comment. Neither of Ohio's U.S. senators, Sherrod Brown or Rob Portman, signed the Senate's letter. Renacci also said he gained support from both parties. But of the 146 members of the House and Senate who signed the letters, only three were Democrats: House members Collin Peterson of Minnesota, Dave Loebsack of Iowa and Terri Sewell of Alabama. FollowTheMoney .org, a website that tracks campaign contributions, said the nursing home industry has given Renacci's campaign $166,400 since he took office in 2011. He had the largest dollar amount in donations from the industry of any of the politicians who signed the letters. The industry gave a total of more than $1.98 million to 104 House members, and $587,000 to 24 Senators, who signed the letters seeking the re-evaluation of the standards, according to FollowTheMoney. Eighteen officeholders did not receive contributions from the industry, according to the website. The website stated that the contributions make up a miniscule fraction of the legislators' war chests -- in some cases less than 1 percent. But James Thurber, a professor of government at American University in Washington, D.C., said the amount is not always important. "Even if it is a small amount, it is a way of opening doors," Thurber said. "It all adds up in terms of access. It doesn't mean that [the lawmakers] will do anything for getting this money. It doesn't mean that it is corrupt. It means they could be more friendly to the owners of nursing homes, that they could listen." Renacci said he does not pay attention to campaign contributions. He said he simply wants the best care for residents while alleviating the financial burden and stress on nursing home owners. But advocates like Harrington, of the University of California at San Francisco, disagree. "These letters are extremely concerning," Harrington said. "[Members of Congress] are just going along with what the for-profit nursing home industry wants. To go backwards in the care for residents is very disturbing." Return to story followGraphic.jpg (BUTTON) View Comments cleveland.com an advance Ohio platform in partnership with The Plain Dealer About Us * About Cleveland.com * About Advance Ohio * Advertise with us * Audience FAQ * Contact Us * Career Opportunities * Community FAQ Subscribe * The Plain Dealer * Sun News * eNewsletters Subscriber Service * Media Insider Rewards * View My Profile * Pick up The Plain Dealer * Report a Delivery Issue * Place a Vacation Hold * Make a Payment Cleveland.com Sections * News * Sports * High School Sports * Entertainment * Living * Politics * Opinion * Obituaries * Jobs * Autos * Real Estate * Rentals * Classifieds * Shopping Deals and Coupons * Local Businesses * Deals in Your Area Your Regional News Pages * Beachwood * Brunswick * Lakewood * Parma & Parma Heights * Strongsville * More Communities Mobile * Mobile Apps More on Cleveland.com * Videos * Photos * Interact with us * Weather * Post a job * Post a classified ad * Sell your car * Sell/rent your home * Sitemap & search * Sponsor Content Follow Us * Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Instagram | Pinterest Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy © 2017 Advance Ohio All rights reserved (About Us). The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Advance Ohio Community Rules apply to all content you upload or otherwise submit to this site. Ad Choices