Fichier de travail (INPUT) : ./DUMP-TEXT/1/45-utf8.txt
Encodage utilisé (INPUT) : UTF-8
Forme recherchée : MOTIF=\b([Pp]eine de mort)|([Pp]eine capitale)|([Dd]eath penalty)|([Cc]apital punishment)\b | اعدام | اﻻعدام | يعدم | عدم | أعدم | 死刑
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Ligne n°3 : CAPTION: The Death Penalty
- Ligne n°5 : The Issue: Is the death penalty consistent with the Eighth Amendment's
Ligne n°6 : prohibition against the imposition of cruel and unusual punishments? ...
Ligne n°11 : ... penalty in the 1940s and 1950s. In each case it upheld the state's- Ligne n°12 : action without addressing the larger issue of the death penalty's
Ligne n°13 : constitutionality. In 1947, for example, the Court considered the case ...
Ligne n°25 : ... punishment. In so doing, the Court announced a standard that would- Ligne n°26 : guide analysis in future death penalty cases. The Court in Trop said
Ligne n°27 : that the Eighth Amendment demanded that punishments "be consistent with ...
Ligne n°30 : ... In the 1960s, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, led by Professor Anthony- Ligne n°31 : Amsterdam mounted a full-scale attack on the death penalty. Adopting a
Ligne n°32 : "moratorium strategy," the LDF succeeded in blocking all executions for ...
Ligne n°35 : ... In Furman v Georgia in 1972, the Court voted 5 to 4 to invalidate all- Ligne n°36 : then-existing death penalty laws based on the inherent arbitrariness of
Ligne n°37 : their application. In a key concurring opinion, justices said the ...
Ligne n°46 : ... determine whether to execute, has since become the model for statutes- Ligne n°47 : in death penalty states. In the death penalty phase of trials, jurors
- Ligne n°47 : in death penalty states. In the death penalty phase of trials, jurors
Ligne n°48 : are now required to make specific findings concerning the presence or ...
Ligne n°52 : ... The Court continued to face questions concerning the appliction of the- Ligne n°53 : death penalty: to non-murderers, to minors, to mentally disabled
Ligne n°54 : prisoners, to racial minorities. One such case is McCleskey v. Kemp ...
Ligne n°60 : ... penalty in special contexts. In 2002, the Supreme Court held in Atkins- Ligne n°61 : v Virginia that the death penalty was unconstitutional when applied to
Ligne n°62 : the mentally retarded. Voting 6 to 3, the Court concluded that ...
Ligne n°65 : ... constitutionality of criminal punishments. The same test was applied- Ligne n°66 : in 2005 in Roper v Simmons to find that the death penalty could not be
Ligne n°67 : applied to persons under the age of 18 at the time of their crime. ...
Ligne n°69 : ... that the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its- Ligne n°70 : face against the juvenile death penalty." Roper reversed a decision of
Ligne n°71 : the Court sixteen years earlier upholding such sentences. ...
Ligne n°80 : ... Links- Ligne n°81 : ACLU Death Penalty Site
Ligne n°82 : Death Penalty Information Center ...
Ligne n°81 : ... ACLU Death Penalty Site- Ligne n°82 : Death Penalty Information Center
Ligne n°83 : Amnesty International Death Penalty Site ...
Ligne n°82 : ... Death Penalty Information Center- Ligne n°83 : Amnesty International Death Penalty Site
Ligne n°84 : Death Penalty Net ...
Ligne n°83 : ... Amnesty International Death Penalty Site- Ligne n°84 : Death Penalty Net
Ligne n°85 : Methods of Execution by State ...
Ligne n°87 : ... Oral Argument Audio File- Ligne n°88 : The Death Penalty in America
Ligne n°89 : The Federalist Society ...
Ligne n°91 : ... The Leopold & Loeb Case (1924)- Ligne n°92 : One of the most eloquent attacks on the death penalty ever delivered in
Ligne n°93 : an American courtroom came in the Leopold & Loeb Case . Clarence ...
Ligne n°102 : ... [Leo_dapt2.jpg]- Ligne n°103 : Clarence Darrow attacks the death penalty during the Leopold and Loeb
Ligne n°104 : trial of 1924. ...
Ligne n°113 : ... reference to "capital crimes" in the Fifth Amendment contemplated a ban- Ligne n°114 : on capital punishment in the Eighth Amendment?
Ligne n°115 : 2. On the other hand, doesn't the debate suggest that the framers--who ...
Ligne n°115 : ... 2. On the other hand, doesn't the debate suggest that the framers--who- Ligne n°116 : could have chosen language explicitly authorizing the death penalty or
Ligne n°117 : all then-existing punishments, but instead chose vague language capable ...
Ligne n°119 : ... Amendment change over time?- Ligne n°120 : 3. Even if the death penalty is constiutional, does it follow that all
Ligne n°121 : existing forms of the death penalty are constitutional. Is Florida's ...
Ligne n°120 : ... 3. Even if the death penalty is constiutional, does it follow that all- Ligne n°121 : existing forms of the death penalty are constitutional. Is Florida's
Ligne n°122 : use of electrocution, for example, consistent with the cruel and ...
Ligne n°123 : ... unusual punishment clause?- Ligne n°124 : 4. Does the evidence suggest that the death penalty deters murder any
Ligne n°125 : more than a sentence of life without the possibility of parole? If it ...
Ligne n°125 : ... more than a sentence of life without the possibility of parole? If it- Ligne n°126 : doesn't, does that suggest the death penalty is an excessive
Ligne n°127 : punishment? ...
Ligne n°127 : ... punishment?- Ligne n°128 : 5. What is the best argument for the death penalty? Is the death
Ligne n°129 : penalty necessary to deter life prisoners from committing murder in ...
Ligne n°135 : ... individual is "mentally retarded," and therefore protected against- Ligne n°136 : infliction of the death penalty under Atkins v Virginia?