[p?c1=2&c2=18406752&cv=2.0&cj=1] #News and Politics (RSS 2.0) Slate Sign In Sign Up Why Putin Wants Us to Believe He’s Crazy Slate Sign In Sign Up Slate Foreigners Opinions about events beyond our borders. March 17 2014 1:06 PM Why Putin Wants Us to Believe He’s Crazy The Russian president is more likely to get what he wants if we think he’s off his rocker. By Scott Radnitz Russian President Vladimir Putin President Putin’s March 4 press conference, where he rambled about foreign conspiracies and repeatedly contradicted himself, gave weight to the idea that he is unhinged. Photo by ALEXEY NIKOLSKY/AFP/Getty Images The outcome of the crisis in Ukraine depends to an unusual extent on the intentions of one man: Russian President Vladimir Putin. In the last few weeks, since the collapse of Viktor Yanukovych’s Russia-friendly regime and Moscow’s precipitous invasion of Crimea, analysts have been obsessed with trying to get inside the Russian leader’s mind. Initially, when Russian troops without insignia appeared in Crimea, the assumption was that Putin was a strategic thinker, taking advantage of a weak central government and appealing to receptive residents who believed Russian propaganda about a fascist government in Kiev. He would bargain for some concessions, the thinking went, but was not so crazy as to risk a war with NATO and jeopardize years of efforts to improve Russia’s image abroad. It was believed Putin was engaged in ordinary brinkmanship. However, once the occupation deepened and the Crimean parliament approved the holding of a referendum to join with Russia—with the Russian government’s support—the narrative changed. Now, Putin’s actions appear to some to have been not a kneejerk decision, but part of a larger campaign to restore the Soviet Union, unite all the Russians of the former empire, or take over all of Ukraine. Putin’s actions are consistent with an enraged hypernationalist, conspiratorial madman who is heedless of the consequences to Russia and himself. Advertisement Others have gone further, arguing that Putin is off his rocker. There is the believes-his-own-propaganda theory that Putin sees himself in a replay of World War II and a struggle against Nazis. There is the living-in-a-bubble theory that Putin has shut himself off from the world and only consults with like-minded, nationalist ex-KGB advisers who loathe the United States. And there is the blind-rage thesis that, after losing his ally in Ukraine, Putin is simply acting out of spite by attacking an easy target. Putin’s March 4 press conference, where he rambled about foreign conspiracies and repeatedly contradicted himself, gave weight to the idea that he is unhinged. After speaking to the Russian president, German Chancellor Angela Merkel made the offhand comment that he appeared to be living “in another world.” It may indeed be that Putin is deranged. His actions are certainly consistent with the portrait of an enraged, hypernationalist, conspiratorial madman who is heedless of the consequences to Russia and to himself. But they are also consistent with another possibility—that Putin is still merely engaging in brinkmanship, and rationally so. To understand why, consider strategic theorist Thomas Schelling’s concept of the “rationality of irrationality.” This can be illustrated through the game of chicken, in which two drivers are heading for each other at full speed, and the first to swerve is the chicken. A driver who appears crazy enough to prefer dying over chickening out will always have the advantage. It is therefore rational for a player to convince his opponent that he is actually irrational. To go back to the original metaphor, it’s called brinkmanship because the negotiator is prepared to go to up to the brink; the best tactician is the one who can make people believe he is willing to go over the brink. President Richard Nixon tried this approach when negotiating with the North Vietnamese, by spreading word that he was prepared to use nuclear weapons to end the war (the Vietnamese did not believe him). When it comes to Ukraine, if Putin is rationally trying to appear irrational, then he is pulling it off spectacularly. With the nervous talk in Western foreign policy circles about mobilizing NATO, dealing with a potential split of Ukraine, and having a failed state on the EU’s borders, many would be relieved to find a way to de-escalate the crisis by taking seriously any demands Putin makes—once he makes them. (An additional wrinkle is that the longer Putin waits before letting his counterparts know what he wants, the more agitated they get, and the more likely they will make concessions that once seemed unacceptable but now appear reasonable.) After Sunday’s referendum, in which 97 percent “voted” for annexation, the loss of only Crimea (whether formalized or de facto) might appear like a victory to the Ukrainian government and its supporters. Likewise, given fears of a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, radical autonomy in the eastern regions might seem like a relief, even though it would give Russia guaranteed influence over Ukrainian politics. Even a commitment that Ukraine will not seek to join NATO (most likely to be made privately) would seem acceptable under the new normal. Top Comment I don't see much mystery here. The US and the UK shot their bolt in Afghanistan and Iraq. Their populations will not support another war right now. More... -Lysander Join In One danger of this strategy is that by getting too close to the brink, the players may accidentally fall over it. And Putin is indeed getting close. Busing Russian nationalists to fake rallies in eastern Ukraine and stirring up primal fears about Ukraine’s government risks unleashing forces outside of his control. It is easy to envision scenarios in which violent street clashes trigger mobilization by Ukrainian or Russian forces to protect “their” side, which could inadvertently result in armed conflict that no one wanted. But this is precisely the point: The risk of unintended escalation gives Putin a stronger hand. No one knows if Putin has been stoking Western anxieties and manufacturing craziness as part of a deliberate, orchestrated campaign. He has probably been improvising for much of the last three weeks. It is also likely that he receives bad advice and his perceptions of events are extremely biased. But given all the breathless claims about what may be going on inside the president’s deranged head, it is worth considering that Putin may be fully aware of just how crazy he seems. Scott Radnitz is an associate professor at the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies and the director of the Ellison Center for Russian, East European, and Central Asian Studies at the University of Washington. REPRINT PRINT EMAIL (BUTTON) Load Comments Powered by Livefyre News & Politics Politics Jan. 13 2016 12:01 AM Obama Just Gave His Cockiest State of the Union For his final address, the president was all swagger. Isaac Chotiner Nikki Haley Rebukes Trump in the GOP’s State of the Union Rebuttal Obama Made a Plea for Compromise. But Everyone Doesn’t Agree With His Premises. The Impressive Feats That Won the Connecticut Governor a Trip to the State of the Union Here’s How Liberals and Conservatives Are Spinning Obama’s Final State of the Union Ted Cruz Birthers Aren’t Going Away, and the GOP Seems Totally Cool With That Obama Needs to Make This the Most Explicitly Partisan State of the Union Speech Ever All Nikki Haley Can Do in Her SOTU Rebuttal Is Hope Not to Screw Up Business Moneybox Jan. 12 2016 6:49 PM The Boys Who Got to Remake an Economy They embraced free-market economics in America. Then Chile’s dictator let them transform an entire society. Tania Opazo If You Win Powerball, Will You Be Able to Hold on to Your Haul? The CW Might Build Its Own Streaming Service. Is That a Threat to Netflix? The Bowie Bond: How Ziggy Stardust Proved That Wall Street Could Sell Pretty Much Anything You Have a Secret Rating on Tinder That Only Tinder Can See How This Guy Convinced the Jacksonville Jaguars to Buy His Fish-Oil Cookies GM May Have Just Changed the Game for Electric Cars. Here’s What It’s Up To. Teslas Can Now Drive Themselves Out of Their Owners’ Garages Life Schooled Jan. 13 2016 12:04 AM Obama’s Education Legacy Is More of a Mixed Bag Than He’d Like to Admit Laura Moser House Republicans Stupidly Use Gay Jeopardy! Star as Face of Snapchat Campaign James Obergefell and Kim Davis Will Attend Obama’s Final State of the Union Address Donald Trump Embraces the Proud GOP Tradition of Bashing the Department of Education New Research Shows Anti-Gay Parents Still Love Their LGBTQ Kids Here’s Every Living or Extinct Creature Named After David Attenborough Emojis Were Created in the 1990s. These Designers Want to Help Them Grow Up. Witness the Controlled Chaos of Boston Traffic, As Filmed From a Streetcar in 1906 Double X The XX Factor Jan. 12 2016 5:47 PM Stress, Hormones, and Discrimination: Why Women Are More Depressed Than Men Christina Cauterucci Today’s Parents Aren't Wusses—They’re Struggling with Forces Beyond Their Control The Media’s Grotesque Attempt to Smear Hillary, Again, for Bill’s Affairs An App Just Told Me I’m Really Ugly by Switzerland’s Standards, and You Can Too The Story Behind El Chapo’s Psychedelic Button-Down Shirts Who Is Marco Rubio’s New Anti-Feminist Adviser? Could Abortion Become a Wedge Issue in the South’s Last Semi-Swing State? Why Hillary Clinton’s Call-Out of the Hyde Amendment Is So Important Slate Plus Slate Plus Jan. 12 2016 5:13 PM Which Edition of Tristram Shandy Should I Get? With some classic novels, it doesn’t matter. Not this one. Jess Keiser Which Hall of Fame Is Right for You? Here’s the Lowdown From Hang Up and Listen. Are Charts the Answer to Messy Mornings or Just Another Excuse for a Meltdown? Twitter’s Wrong to Say the Oregon Standoff Is About Race. Here’s Why. What Should I Do About My Husband’s Fetishes? Dear Prudence Answers More Questions—Only for Slate Plus. Arts Brow Beat Jan. 12 2016 9:03 PM If the State of the Union Were a Wes Anderson Film Sharan Shetty EL VY and Stay Human Performed “Let’s Dance” on The Late Show as a Touching Bowie Tribute Directors Guild of America Nominations Suggest You Shouldn’t Bet Against ​The Big Short David Bowie Slammed MTV On-Air in 1983 for the Lack of Diversity in Its Music Videos The Limitless Inventiveness of Walker Evans James Franco Travels to the 1960s to Stop the JFK Assassination in the First 11.22.63 Trailer David Bowie Inspired the Misfits, the Strivers, the Transformers Technology Future Tense Jan. 12 2016 1:35 PM Dear Hackers, Please Tell Us Our Security Flaws. Sincerely, GM. Andy Greenberg This Man Was Banned From Playing a Video Game Because of National Security? 17-Year-Old Aaron Swartz: Thomas Jefferson Would Hate 21st-Century Copyright Laws What Experiments to Block Out the Sun Can’t Tell Us Aaron Swartz Was Wrong About MIT. It’s Been a Hotbed for Corporate—Not Hacker—Culture. Streaming Superstar Adam Sandler Is a Big Fish in a Small, Unfunny Pond The New iOS Will Help You Sleep Better by Turning Your Screen Orange at Night Health & Science Bad Astronomy Jan. 12 2016 11:45 AM This Is Not a Still From a Sci-Fi Movie Phil Plait Why Do Dogs, Cats, Camels, and Llamas Make That Weird Face? Facebook CEO Zuckerberg Promotes Vaccines, Gets a Load of Anti-Vaxxers Polluting His Post Space Oddities Gardasil: More Anti-Vax Claims Don’t Stand Up to Scrutiny This Man Temporarily Paralyzed Himself to Find a Better Treatment for Snakebites Is Glass a Liquid? Sports Sports Nut Jan. 10 2016 2:27 PM The Most Horrifying Moments in the Steelers-Bengals Game, Ranked Brutal hits, fans throwing stuff at an injured quarterback, and an assistant coach yanking a player’s hair. Josh Levin and Jeremy Stahl Nick Saban Might Be the Greatest College Coach of All Time. He’s Definitely the Grimmest. Why Dabo Swinney’s Christianity Is the Perfect Marketing Tool for Clemson Football It’s Silly Season for Bowl Games, but None Could Be Sillier Than the Glasnost Bowl The Steph Curry Spiciness Index: Does This Step-Back Bomb Crack His Top-Five Plays? Concussion Gets Basic Facts Wrong and Feeds Myths About the NFL and Head Trauma The Steph Curry Spiciness Index: Does This Behind-the-Back Magic Crack His Top-Five Plays? Slate Sign In Sign Up Most Read * 1. The Mass Sexual Assault in Germany Could End Up With Hundreds of Thousands of Victims * 2. Help! My Adult Son Lives at Home but Pretends We Don’t Exist. * 3. Anti-Vaxxers Go Nuts When Mark Zuckerberg Posts Photo of Daughter at Doctor’s Office * 4. Who Really Controls What You See in Your Facebook Feed—and Why They Keep Changing It * 5. Obama Just Gave His Cockiest State of the Union Most Shared * 1. Michigan Knew Last Year That Flint’s Water Might Be Poisoned But Didn't Tell Anyone * 2. David Bowie’s Best TV Appearance Ever Was This Bit From Ricky Gervais’ Extras * 3. “Under Pressure” Is a Reminder That David Bowie Could Also Be Wonderfully, Powerfully Human * 4. David Bowie, a Legend Who Never Stopped Reinventing Himself, Is Dead at 69 * 5. Why David Bowie’s Androgyny Was a Rare, Precious Gift [psjan121457.jpg.CROP.hd-large.jpg] A Trip Through the “Suspended Forest” FOLLOW SLATE [yellow-twitterNew.821dc365.png] [yellow-facebookNew.74981e6f.png] [instagram2x.bcd68bf9.png] SLATE ON IPAD IPHONE ANDROID KINDLE REPRINTS ADVERTISE WITH US * ABOUT US * CONTACT US * WORK WITH US * USER AGREEMENT * PRIVACY POLICY * FAQ * FEEDBACK * CORRECTIONS * [the-slate-group-logo.12cbe5ac.png] * [footer_panoply_grey_logo.42487894.png] * Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company. All contents © 2016 The Slate Group LLC. All rights reserved. Slate Slate Sign In Sign Up