#alternate TechCrunch » Feed TechCrunch » Comments Feed TechCrunch » The Online Privacy Lie Is Unraveling Comments Feed Live Rowing Is An App and Rowing Machine Monitor That Lets You Challenge Your Friends To A Boat Race The Death And Life Of Truth In The Internet Age alternate alternate TechCrunch WordPress.com Menu TechCrunch Search * Follow Us * Facebook * Instagram * Twitter * Youtube * Flipboard * LinkedIn * Google+ * RSS * More + Youtube + Flipboard + LinkedIn + Google+ + RSS Got a tip? Let us know. * News + Channels + Startups + Mobile + Gadgets + Enterprise + Social + Europe + Asia + Old Crunch Network + Unicorn Leaderboard + Gift Guides All Topics All Galleries Video Shows * Apps * Breaking News * Bullish * Crunch Report * CES 2016 * Gadgets * Interviews * Reviews * TC Cribs * TC Features All Shows All Videos Events * TechCrunch Events * Disrupt * Startup Battlefield * Crunchies * Meetups * International City Events * Hackathon * Include * NFL’s 1ST and Future * TC Davos 2016 * News About * CES All Events CrunchBase * Trending * Apple * Google * Samsung * News * Startups * Mobile * Gadgets * Enterprise * Social * Europe Search TechCrunch Search TechCrunch ____________________ (BUTTON) Search (BUTTON) Search 9th Annual CrunchiesFind Out Who Will Win The Crunchie For Best Mobile App - Citymapper, Messenger, Periscope, Robinhood or Wish Get Your Tickets Today Advertising Tech * Canvs Raises $5.6M To Help TV Networks Track Viewers’ Emotions Canvs Raises $5.6M To Help TV Networks Track Viewers’ Emotions * Facebook’s Engineering Wizardry Makes Even VR Videos Load Fast Facebook’s Engineering Wizardry Makes Even VR Videos Load Fast * Google Blocked 780 Million Bad Ads Last Year, Up From 524 Million In 2014 Google Blocked 780 Million Bad Ads Last Year, Up From 524 Million In 2014 * Browse more... privacy * State Lawmakers Create Coalition To Overhaul Digital Privacy Laws State Lawmakers Create Coalition To Overhaul Digital Privacy Laws * Facebook Expands Tor Support To Android Orbot Proxy Facebook Expands Tor Support To Android Orbot Proxy * FCC Urged To Rein In Broadband Providers On Privacy Grounds FCC Urged To Rein In Broadband Providers On Privacy Grounds * Browse more... The Online Privacy Lie Is Unraveling Posted Jun 6, 2015 by Natasha Lomas (@riptari) * 0 SHARES * * * * * * * * * Next Story Live Rowing Is An App and Rowing Machine Monitor That Lets You Challenge Your Friends To A Boat Race [8100415782_1e4870e67d_h.jpg?w=738] A new report into U.S. consumers’ attitude to the collection of personal data has highlighted the disconnect between commercial claims that web users are happy to trade privacy in exchange for ‘benefits’ like discounts. On the contrary, it asserts that a large majority of web users are not at all happy, but rather feel powerless to stop their data being harvested and used by marketers. The report authors’ argue it’s this sense of resignation that is resulting in data tradeoffs taking place — rather than consumers performing careful cost-benefit analysis to weigh up the pros and cons of giving up their data (as marketers try to claim). They also found that where consumers were most informed about marketing practices they were also more likely to be resigned to not being able to do anything to prevent their data being harvested. “Rather than feeling able to make choices, Americans believe it is futile to manage what companies can learn about them. Our study reveals that more than half do not want to lose control over their information but also believe this loss of control has already happened,” the authors write. Americans believe it is futile to manage what companies can learn about them. “By misrepresenting the American people and championing the tradeoff argument, marketers give policymakers false justifications for allowing the collection and use of all kinds of consumer data often in ways that the public find objectionable. Moreover, the futility we found, combined with a broad public fear about what companies can do with the data, portends serious difficulties not just for individuals but also — over time — for the institution of consumer commerce.” “It is not difficult to predict widespread social tensions, and concerns about democratic access to the marketplace, if Americans continue to be resigned to a lack of control over how, when, and what marketers learn about them,” they add. The report, entitled The Tradeoff Fallacy: How marketers are misrepresenting American consumers and opening them up to exploitation, is authored by three academics from the University of Pennsylvania, and is based on a representative national cell phone and wireline phone survey of more than 1,500 Americans age 18 and older who use the internet or email “at least occasionally”. Key findings on American consumers include that — * 91% disagree (77% of them strongly) that “If companies give me a discount, it is a fair exchange for them to collect information about me without my knowing” * 71% disagree (53% of them strongly) that “It’s fair for an online or physical store to monitor what I’m doing online when I’m there, in exchange for letting me use the store’s wireless internet, or Wi-Fi, without charge.” * 55% disagree (38% of them strongly) that “It’s okay if a store where I shop uses information it has about me to create a picture of me that improves the services they provide for me.” The authors go on to note that “only about 4% agree or agree strongly” with all three of the above propositions. And even with a broader definition of “a belief in tradeoffs” they found just a fifth (21%) were comfortably accepting of the idea. So the survey found very much a minority of consumers are happy with current data tradeoffs. The report also flags up that large numbers (often a majority) of U.S. consumers are unaware of how their purchase and usage data can be sold on or shared with third parties without their permission or knowledge — in many instances falsely believing they have greater data protection rights than they are in fact afforded by law. Examples the report notes include — * 49% of American adults who use the Internet believe (incorrectly) that by law a supermarket must obtain a person’s permission before selling information about that person’s food purchases to other companies. * 69% do not know that a pharmacy does not legally need a person’s permission to sell information about the over-the-counter drugs that person buys. * 65% do not know that the statement “When a website has a privacy policy, it means the site will not share my information with other websites and companies without my permission” is false. * 55% do not know it is legal for an online store to charge different people different prices at the same time of day. * 62% do not know that price-comparison sites like Expedia or Orbitz are not legally required to include the lowest travel prices. Data-mining in the spotlight One thing is clear: the great lie about online privacy is unraveling. The obfuscated commercial collection of vast amounts of personal data in exchange for ‘free’ services is gradually being revealed for what it is: a heist of unprecedented scale. Behind the bland, intellectually dishonest facade that claims there’s ‘nothing to see here’ gigantic data-mining apparatus have been manoeuvered into place, atop vast mountains of stolen personal data. Stolen because it has never been made clear to consumers what is being taken, and how that information is being used. How can you consent to something you don’t know or understand? Informed consent requires transparency and an ability to control what happens. Both of which are systematically undermined by companies whose business models require that vast amounts of personal data be shoveled ceaselessly into their engines. This is why regulators are increasingly focusing attention on the likes of Google and Facebook. And why companies with different business models, such as hardware maker Apple, are joining the chorus of condemnation. Cloud-based technology companies large and small have exploited and encouraged consumer ignorance, concealing their data-mining algorithms and processes inside proprietary black boxes labeled ‘commercially confidential’. The larger entities spend big on pumping out a steady stream of marketing misdirection — distracting their users with shiny new things, or proffering up hollow reassurances about how they don’t sell your personal data. Make no mistake: this is equivocation. Google sells access to its surveillance intelligence on who users are via its ad-targeting apparatus — so it doesn’t need to sell actual data. Its intelligence on web users’ habits and routines and likes and dislikes is far more lucrative than handing over the digits of anyone’s phone number. (The company is also moving in the direction of becoming an online marketplace in its own right — by adding a buy button directly to mobile search results. So it’s intending to capture, process and convert more transactions itself — directly choreographing users’ commercial activity.) These platforms also work to instill a feeling of impotence in users in various subtle ways, burying privacy settings within labyrinthine submenus. And technical information in unreadable terms and conditions. Doing everything they can to fog rather than fess up to the reality of the gigantic tradeoff lurking in the background. Yet slowly, but slowly this sophisticated surveillance apparatus is being dragged into the light. The privacy costs involved for consumers who pay for ‘free’ services by consenting to invasive surveillance of what they say, where they go, who they know, what they like, what they watch, what they buy, have never been made clear by the companies involved in big data mining. But costs are becoming more apparent, as glimpses of the extent of commercial tracking activities leak out. And as more questions are asked the discrepancy between the claim that there’s ‘nothing to see here’ vs the reality of sleepless surveillance apparatus peering over your shoulder, logging your pulse rate, reading your messages, noting what you look at, for how long and what you do next — and doing so to optimize the lifting of money out of your wallet — then the true consumer cost of ‘free’ becomes more visible than it has ever been. The tradeoff lie is unraveling, as the scale and implications of the data heist are starting to be processed. One clear tipping point here is NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden who, two years ago, risked life and liberty to reveal how the U.S. government (and many other governments) were involved in a massive, illegal logging of citizens’ digital communications. The documents he released also showed how commercial technology platforms had been appropriated and drawn into this secretive state surveillance complex. Once governments were implicated, it was only a matter of time before the big Internet platforms, with their mirror data-capturing apparatus, would face questions. Snowden’s revelations have had various reforming political implications for surveillance in the U.S. and Europe. Tech companies have also been forced to take public stances — either to loudly defend user privacy, or be implicated by silence and inaction. Another catalyst for increasing privacy concerns is the Internet of Things. A physical network of connected objects blinking and pinging notifications is itself a partial reveal of the extent of the digital surveillance apparatus that has been developed behind commercially closed doors. Modern consumer electronics are hermetically sealed black boxes engineered to conceal complexity. But the complexities of hooking all these ‘smart’ sensornet objects together, and placing so many data-sucking tentacles on display, in increasingly personal places (the home, the body) — starts to make surveillance infrastructure and its implications uncomfortably visible. Plus this time it’s manifestly personal. It’s in your home and on your person — which adds to a growing feeling of being creeped out and spied upon. And as more and more studies highlight consumer concern about how personal data is being harvested and processed, regulators are also taking notice — and turning up the heat. One response to growing consumer concerns about personal data came this week with Google launching a centralized dashboard for users to access (some) privacy settings. It’s far from perfect, and contains plentiful misdirection about the company’s motives, but it’s telling that this ad-fueled behemoth feels the need to be more pro-active in its presentation of its attitude and approach to user privacy. Radical transparency The Tradeoff report authors include a section at the end with suggestions for improving transparency around marketing processes, calling for “initiatives that will give members of the public the right and ability to learn what companies know about them, how they profile them, and what data lead to what personalized offers” — and for getting consumers “excited about using that right and ability”. Among their suggestions to boost transparency and corporate openness are — * Public interest organizations and government agencies developing clear definitions of transparency that reflect consumer concerns, and then systematically calling out companies regarding how well or badly they are doing based on these values, in order to help consumers ‘vote with their wallets’ * Activities to “dissect and report on the implications of privacy policies” — perhaps aided by crowdsourced initiatives — so that complex legalize is interpreted and implications explained for a consumer audience, again allowing for good practice to be praised (and vice versa) * Advocating for consumers to gain access to the personal profiles companies create on them in order for them to understand how their data is being used “As long as the algorithms companies implement to analyze and predict the future behaviors of individuals are hidden from public view, the potential for unwanted marketer exploitation of individuals’ data remains high. We therefore ought to consider it an individual’s right to access the profiles and scores companies use to create every personalized message and discount the individual receives,” the report adds. “Companies will push back that giving out this information will expose trade secrets. We argue there are ways to carry this out while keeping their trade secrets intact.” They’re not the only ones calling for algorithms to be pulled into view either — back in April the French Senate backed calls for Google to reveal the workings of its search ranking algorithms. In that instance the focus is commercial competition to ensure a level playing field, rather than user privacy per se, but it’s clear that more questions are being asked about the power of proprietary algorithms and the hidden hierarchies they create. Startups should absolutely see the debunking of the myth that consumers are happy to trade privacy for free services as a fresh opportunity for disruption — to build services that stand out because they aren’t predicated on the assumption that consumers can and should be tricked into handing over data and having their privacy undermined on the sly. Services that stand upon a futureproofed foundation where operational transparency inculcates user trust — setting these businesses up for bona fide data exchanges, rather than shadowy tradeoffs. Featured Image: Marjan Lazarevski/Flickr UNDER A CC BY-ND 2.0 LICENSE * 0 SHARES * 0 Share * 0 Tweet * 0 Share * 0 * 0 * 0 * * Advertisement Advertisement TechCrunch Newsletters [ ] TechCrunch Daily Our top headlines Delivered daily [ ] TC Week-in-Review Top stories of the week Delivered weekly [ ] CrunchBase Daily The latest startup funding announcements Delivered daily [ ] TC Europe The top European tech stories Delivered weekly [ ] TC Gadgets Top stories about gadgets Delivered weekly [ ] TC Mobile & Apps Top stories about apps Delivered weekly [ ] TC Startups Top stories about startups Delivered weekly [ ] TC Social Media Top stories about social Delivered weekly [ ] TC Asia The top Asian tech stories Delivered weekly [ ] Crunch Network The best from our contributors Delivered weekly View More Enter Address ____________________ (BUTTON) Subscribe Latest Crunch Report * Facebook Sports Stadium Wants to Be Your New Sports Hub | Crunch Report Facebook Sports Stadium Wants to Be Your New Sports Hub | Crunch Report Watch More Episodes * privacy * Advertising Tech * Popular Posts Featured Stories * The Online Privacy Lie Is Unraveling Don Baer On Politician's Approach To Technology VIDEO | 12:03 | Breaking News * Werner Herzog On His Documentary Lo And Behold, Cockroach Movies And Moving To Mars Werner Herzog On His Documentary Lo And Behold, Cockroach Movies And Moving To Mars 1 hour ago | Matthew Panzarino * Get Ready For A Smaller iPhone 6s Mini Get Ready For A Smaller iPhone 6s Mini 4 hours ago | Romain Dillet * Netflix Makes Good On Promises To Crack Down On VPNs, But Blocks Are Short-Lived Netflix Makes Good On Promises To Crack Down On VPNs, But Blocks Are Short-Lived 5 hours ago | Sarah Perez * Forthcoming Samsung Galaxy S7 Benchmarks Leak Forthcoming Samsung Galaxy S7 Benchmarks Leak 11 hours ago | Natasha Lomas Latest From TechCrunch * Gravit Lets You Illustrate In Your Abode Or On The Road Gravit Lets You Illustrate In Your Abode Or On The Road 1 hour ago | John Biggs * Apple Has A New Apple TV Ad, And It’s All About Apps Apple Has A New Apple TV Ad, And It’s All About Apps 1 hour ago | Romain Dillet * Werner Herzog On His Documentary Lo And Behold, Cockroach Movies And Moving To Mars Werner Herzog On His Documentary Lo And Behold, Cockroach Movies And Moving To Mars 1 hour ago | Matthew Panzarino * A Day After Launch, “Exploding Kittens” Tops The App Store A Day After Launch, “Exploding Kittens” Tops The App Store 1 hour ago | Sarah Perez Up Next Live Rowing Is An App and Rowing Machine Monitor That Lets You Challenge Your Friends To A Boat Race Posted Jun 6, 2015 CrunchBoard Job Listings * Principal Analyst - Marketing Technology CarMax * Architect - Enterprise Information CarMax * Senior Software Developer - Web Development CarMax * Online Systems Platform Manager CarMax * Team Manager- CRM CarMax More from CrunchBoard Advertisement TechCrunch [crunch-network.jpg] * News * TCTV * Events * CrunchBase About * Staff * Contact Us * Advertise With Us * Send Us A Tip International * China * Europe * Japan Follow TechCrunch * Facebook * Twitter * Google+ * LinkedIn * Youtube * Pinterest * Tumblr * Instagram * StumbleUpon * Feed TechCrunch Apps * iOS * Android * Windows 8 Subscribe to TechCrunch Daily Latest headlines delivered to you daily [X] Subscribe to Subscribe to TechCrunch Daily Enter Email Address ____________________ (BUTTON) Subscribe © 2013-2016 AOL Inc. All rights reserved. Aol Tech Privacy Policy About Our Ads Anti Harassment Policy Terms of Service Powered by WordPress.com VIP Fonts by [b?c1=2&c2=6036210&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=1.3&cj=1] * TechCrunch (BUTTON) * News + Startups + Mobile + Gadgets + Enterprise + Social + Europe + Asia + Old Crunch Network + Unicorn Leaderboard + Gift Guides + All Galleries Videos * Apps * Breaking News * Bullish * Crunch Report * CES 2016 * All Shows * All Videos Events * Disrupt * Startup Battlefield * Crunchies * Meetups * International City Events * Hackathon * Include * NFL’s 1ST and Future * TC Davos 2016 * All Events CrunchBase ____________________ (BUTTON) (BUTTON) Most Popular Get Ready For A Smaller iPhone 6s Mini 4 hours ago by Romain Dillet A Day After Launch, “Exploding Kittens” Tops The App Store 1 hour ago by Sarah Perez Forthcoming Samsung Galaxy S7 Benchmarks Leak 11 hours ago by Natasha Lomas Netflix Makes Good On Promises To Crack Down On VPNs, But Blocks Are Short-Lived 5 hours ago by Sarah Perez Why Cloud Computing Will Shake Up Security 2 hours ago by Tom Gillis Apple Has A New Apple TV Ad, And It’s All About Apps 1 hour ago by Romain Dillet SpaceX Tested Its Capsule That Will Send Humans To Space 1 hour ago by Emily Calandrelli These Are The Most-Watched Vines Of The Year 5 hours ago by Jordan Crook Google Reportedly Paid Apple $1B In 2014 To Remain Default Search Engine On iOS 17 hours ago by Jon Russell