#alternate TechCrunch » Feed TechCrunch » Comments Feed TechCrunch »
Push For Greater State Surveillance Powers Could Have Chilling Effect
On U.K. Tech Sector Comments Feed Millennials Are Destroying Banks, And
It’s The Banks’ Fault The Obsession With Silicon Everywhere alternate
alternate TechCrunch WordPress.com
Menu TechCrunch Search
* Follow Us
* Facebook
* Instagram
* Twitter
* Youtube
* Flipboard
* LinkedIn
* Google+
* RSS
* More
+ Youtube
+ Flipboard
+ LinkedIn
+ Google+
+ RSS
Got a tip? Let us know.
* News
+ Channels
+ Startups
+ Mobile
+ Gadgets
+ Enterprise
+ Social
+ Europe
+ Asia
+ Old Crunch Network
+ Unicorn Leaderboard
+ Gift Guides
All Topics All Galleries
Video
Shows
* Apps
* Breaking News
* Bullish
* Crunch Report
* CES 2016
* Gadgets
* Interviews
* Reviews
* TC Cribs
* TC Features
All Shows
All Videos
Events
* TechCrunch Events
* Disrupt
* Startup Battlefield
* Crunchies
* Meetups
* International City Events
* Hackathon
* Include
* NFL’s 1ST and Future
* TC Davos 2016
* News About
* CES
All Events
CrunchBase
* Trending
* Apple
* Google
* Samsung
* News
* Startups
* Mobile
* Gadgets
* Enterprise
* Social
* Europe
Search TechCrunch
Search TechCrunch ____________________ (BUTTON) Search (BUTTON) Search
9th Annual CrunchiesFind Out Who Will Win The Crunchie For Best Mobile
App - Citymapper, Messenger, Periscope, Robinhood or Wish Get Your
Tickets Today
Europe
* At Davos, Kevin Spacey Predicts That Tech Firms Will Follow Netflix
Into Media
At Davos, Kevin Spacey Predicts That Tech Firms Will Follow Netflix
Into Media
* MariaDB Raises $9M More, Michael Howard Named New CEO, Monty
Widenius CTO
MariaDB Raises $9M More, Michael Howard Named New CEO, Monty Widenius CTO
* Kickstarter Needs Better Ways To Sanity-Check Complex Hardware
Projects, Says Zano Review
Kickstarter Needs Better Ways To Sanity-Check Complex Hardware Projects, Says
Zano Review
*
Browse more...
encryption
* Why Cloud Computing Will Shake Up Security
Why Cloud Computing Will Shake Up Security
* Will 2016 See The End Of Closed-Source Politics?
Will 2016 See The End Of Closed-Source Politics?
* UK Surveillance Bill A Risk To Data Security And Privacy, Says ICO
UK Surveillance Bill A Risk To Data Security And Privacy, Says ICO
*
Browse more...
surveillance
* State Lawmakers Create Coalition To Overhaul Digital Privacy Laws
State Lawmakers Create Coalition To Overhaul Digital Privacy Laws
* EU-US Safe Harbor Data Flow Talks Still Sticking On Surveillance
EU-US Safe Harbor Data Flow Talks Still Sticking On Surveillance
* UK Surveillance Bill A Risk To Data Security And Privacy, Says ICO
UK Surveillance Bill A Risk To Data Security And Privacy, Says ICO
*
Browse more...
Push For Greater State Surveillance Powers Could Have Chilling Effect On U.K.
Tech Sector
Posted May 30, 2015 by Natasha Lomas (@riptari)
* 0
SHARES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Next Story
Millennials Are Destroying Banks, And It’s The Banks’ Fault
[16164233084_7f9e0cd5fb_k.jpg?w=738]
The U.K. government is lining up a new piece of legislation to expand
the state’s digital data capture powers. The incoming bill, the
Investigatory Powers Bill, was announced in the Queen’s speech this
week. It has not yet been published in draft form so specific details
of what is being planned remains unclear, but in recent times the
Conservative party has been banging the drum to expand the type and
volume of captured comms data. The U.K. Prime Minister has even
appeared to suggest that strong encryption should be outlawed.
The Telegraph newspaper this week suggested new powers to be outlined
in the Bill will require companies like Google and Facebook to give
U.K. intelligence agencies access to the encrypted conversations of
suspected terrorists and criminals. That scenario presupposes Internet
companies have the ability to access their users’ encrypted messages.
While that is certainly true for some digital services with a sloppy
attitude to security (or with business models that rely on data mining
their users), others, such as Apple, claim they intentionally do not
hold encryption keys — which presumably sets up a legal clash with
security- and privacy-conscious tech companies and the U.K. government.
Does the Tory government intend to make iMessage illegal? That really
will be a *gets popcorn* moment…
The Tory’s prior attempt to expand the state’s data capture powers, the
Communications Data Bill — widely criticized as a ‘Snoopers’ Charter’,
on the grounds that it would have required ISPs to retain detailed data
on web usage — failed to pass through Parliament owing to the lack of
support from the Conservative’s Lib Dem coalition partners. The new
Tory majority government has no such limitation. Former Lib Dem MP
Julian Huppert, who lost his seat in the election this month but was a
prominent critic of the Communications Data Bill, tells TechCrunch he
has concerns about the surveillance powers that the government will be
pushing for.
The concept of keeping track of every website everybody ever goes
to, or of requiring ISPs to keep track of what you do on Facebook
all the time are deeply intrusive.
“We’ll have to see how much they’ll try and throw in to it. When they
were trying to push the Communications Data Bill, initially, the first
version was incredibly broadbrush and afforded powers to do any data
collection. They then admitted, during the process of our
[parliamentary committee] enquiry, that actually there were only three
things they particularly wanted. One of which was IP addressing
matching, which there was good evidence for and we agreed to do… One
was about requiring ISPs to keep track of web logs, effectively. So a
list of every website you go to, and things like that. And the third
thing was to have a power to require ISPs to keep track of third party
information — so what you do on Facebook, what you do on any other
site,” says Huppert.
“Those were the three things they said they wanted. The IP address
matching basically was the only thing they had any evidence for. And it
doesn’t involve any significant privacy intrusions but has huge
advantages. Whereas I think the concept of keeping track of every
website everybody ever goes to, or of requiring ISPs to keep track of
what you do on Facebook all the time are deeply intrusive. And actually
they couldn’t come up with any significant evidence of why it was
useful.”
“There should be a clear piece of legislation that sets out what is ok,
what is not ok, what the processes are for changing it. And it needs to
be written with an acceptance of the need for accountability. And the
need to have as much transparency as is consistent with the genuine
requirements for operational work. But that’s not the approach that’s
been taken before. It’s not the approach that the Home Secretary has
previously urged. Maybe she will change her mind this time but I’m
sceptical,” he adds.
“I worry that the Home Secretary will largely try to simply procure
more powers for the state without justifying it or consider the count
of balancing issues that there are. And certainly, like we’ve seen with
the Prime Minister’s comments about encryption, those are huge threats
to the UK technology sectors. And is definitely not the right way to
proceed.”
Beyond the overreach and privacy intrusion of having the state require
systematic logging of citizens’ web browsing habits and social media
activity, another reason to oppose more expansive state data retention
is that it makes the intelligence agencies’ job harder — given it
increases the noise to signal ration, as Huppert notes.
“There’s no doubt that if you demand more things you have more data,
and if you believe that the problem the intelligence services face at
the moment is a shortage of data then it would address the problem. I
think the problem is they don’t know what to do with all the data that
they have. If you look at the killing of [U.K. soldier] Lee Rigby for
example the problem isn’t that they have no idea. The problem is they
have so much data they couldn’t prioritize it properly,” he argues.
“So unlike IP address matching where there really was a strong case,
there isn’t a clear case here. Beyond ‘we can think of some situations
where it might be useful’. And I think one of the things that people
should look very very carefully at this is what is the evidence for any
of the claims that are made. We certainly found the ones given
initially were, I think the word we used was ‘misleading’.”
He also notes that the Joint Committee report on the draft
Communications Data bill was hugely critical about the lack of
data ministers were able to provide to support assertions that
expanding data capture powers for counter-terrorism purposes would save
lives. So that’s another thorny problem with legislation in this area —
the government can and does shroud its arguments in claims of national
security secrecy. Saying, in essence, ‘we need more data — but we can’t
tell you why’.
And where the U.K. Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee
should be playing a robust role in holding the government to account in
such a sensitive area, Huppert says there has been further failure. So
he’s also not putting much store in claims that the Investigatory
Powers Bill will “provide for appropriate oversight and safeguard
arrangements”.
“We do need better oversight. The intelligence services play an
incredibly important role and we want them to be able to do their jobs
in a clear and accountable way. But the ISC has not played that role,”
he adds. “The Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled against the
government but the executive response was to do nothing and soon after
deny that the ruling had happened. So I don’t have much confidence in
that.”
One portion of U.K. legislation he does support overhauling is RIPA.
Aka the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, which regulates
the powers public bodies have to carry out surveillance and
communications interception. Briefing notes for the Investigatory
Powers Bill state it will aim to “modernise our law in these areas and
ensure it is fit for purpose”.
RIPA has been criticized for years for eroding press freedoms and
sanctioning disproportionate surveillance — by, for instance,
enabling police and local councils to spy on journalists. Or, in
another instance, a local authorities to check if a family was
living in a school catchment area. So there’s a clear need for ripping
up RIPA and starting again.
But again Huppert has concerns about the government’s approach here.
“RIPA does need to be re-written. There’s no doubt about that,” he
says. “It is an atrociously written piece of legislation… I think that
everybody agrees RIPA is not fit for purpose. And that would include
strong critics like myself but also if you look at some of the things
that [Commissioner for the Global Commission on Internet Governance]
David Omand has said… He’s argued for full public and parliamentary
understanding of new powers… So I do think we need to have a re-write
of RIPA but the correct way to do that is through the joint committee
process, thinking about it slowly and carefully — not something rammed
through by a new government eager to get on with it.
“And the intention, which the Tories had agreed to or stated publicly,
was that [to get this balance] there would be a joint committee set up
between both houses to consider how to re-do RIPA. And it does seem to
me that they are jumping the gun somewhat on it.”
Huppert is not alone in his concerns either. This week a UN
report dubbed encryption an essential tool for protecting the right of
freedom of opinion and expression in the digital age. While Sir Tim
Berners-Lee, inventor of the world wide web, called for checks and
balances on government surveillance. Speaking at an Internet festival
taking place in London this week he asked of politicians: “Can you show
us that you can build a system which is accountable to us, where when
the security services take the ability to look at private data, they do
it in a way where it goes through a court, they do in way so my
personal data is not going to be snooped on and when people do have
their data snooped on it’s only used in a very serious process of
tracking down organised crime and terrorism?”
The Investigatory Powers Bill is one of a series of initial bills
announced in the Queen’s speech, which sets out the government
legislative agenda for the new Parliament — so shoring up and expanding
state surveillance and data capture powers is evidently front of mind
and a clear priority for the new U.K. government. How that
preoccupation with supporting and enabling greater state powers of
intrusion on the one hand vs an apparent desire to modernize
problematic older laws pertaining to interception powers plays out
remains to be seen. But the government’s anti-encryption rhetoric
suggests another serious clash of politics vs technology is incoming —
the outcome of which will ripple out to affect both U.K. web users and
their online behavior, and global companies doing business in the U.K.
The U.K. is often referred to as the most surveilled country in the
world — typically a reference to the pervasive use of CCTV. At the last
count there were estimated to be between 4 million and 5.9 million of
these surveillance cameras in the U.K. (which has a population of
around 64 million), although the vast majority are privately owned and
operated — rather than being directly controlled by the state. (The
number of publicly operated cameras in England and Wales is around
100,000.)
This month the U.K.’s surveillance camera commissioner warned that
budget cuts are forcing councils to switch off CCTV cameras. But the
idea that state surveillance capabilities will diminish because
of shrinking government resources seems fantastical. Rather the role of
providing state surveillance apparatus continues to be outsourced to
private operators. So U.K. police and intelligence agencies obtain
whatever CCTV footage they’re after from the private operator funding a
camera in their shop or carpark or driveway — or, hey, even
that in-home Dropcam or the lens on that life-logging wearable that
never stops recording what’s going on around you. Imagine the power of
state surveillance tapping into an expansive Internet of Things
infrastructure that ceaselessly gathers real-time data on every point
of human intersection — public and ‘private’.
When it comes to surveillance of digital comms data, this same
outsourcing modus operandi used with CCTV is being applied by
governments to Internet companies — with the U.K. government now
preparing to push one of the most hawkish data retention agendas in the
Western world, and that despite the censure that has been directed at
systematic digital dragnets in the wake of the Snowden revelations. How
hugely powerful commercial digital platforms respond to being co-opted
as the coal face of state surveillance, where their user data is
then subject to systematic mining by the state as a byproduct of
citizens’ digital participation, continues to be one of the most
pressing issues of our technology-fueled times.
Featured Image: Phil Dolby/Flickr UNDER A CC BY 2.0 LICENSE
* 0
SHARES
* 0
Share
* 0
Tweet
* 0
Share
* 0
* 0
* 0
*
*
Advertisement
Advertisement
TechCrunch Newsletters
[ ] TechCrunch Daily Our top headlines Delivered daily
[ ] TC Week-in-Review Top stories of the week Delivered weekly
[ ] CrunchBase Daily The latest startup funding announcements Delivered
daily
[ ] TC Europe The top European tech stories Delivered weekly
[ ] TC Gadgets Top stories about gadgets Delivered weekly
[ ] TC Mobile & Apps Top stories about apps Delivered weekly
[ ] TC Startups Top stories about startups Delivered weekly
[ ] TC Social Media Top stories about social Delivered weekly
[ ] TC Asia The top Asian tech stories Delivered weekly
[ ] Crunch Network The best from our contributors Delivered weekly
View More
Enter Address ____________________ (BUTTON) Subscribe
Latest Crunch Report
* Facebook Sports Stadium Wants to Be Your New Sports Hub | Crunch
Report
Facebook Sports Stadium Wants to Be Your New Sports Hub | Crunch Report
Watch More Episodes
* encryption
* surveillance
* Europe
* Popular Posts
Featured Stories
* Push For Greater State Surveillance Powers Could Have Chilling
Effect On U.K. Tech Sector
Don Baer On Politician's Approach To Technology
VIDEO | 12:03 | Breaking News
* Werner Herzog On His Documentary Lo And Behold, Cockroach Movies
And Moving To Mars
Werner Herzog On His Documentary Lo And Behold, Cockroach Movies And Moving
To Mars
1 hour ago | Matthew Panzarino
* Get Ready For A Smaller iPhone 6s Mini
Get Ready For A Smaller iPhone 6s Mini
4 hours ago | Romain Dillet
* Netflix Makes Good On Promises To Crack Down On VPNs, But Blocks
Are Short-Lived
Netflix Makes Good On Promises To Crack Down On VPNs, But Blocks
Are Short-Lived
5 hours ago | Sarah Perez
* Forthcoming Samsung Galaxy S7 Benchmarks Leak
Forthcoming Samsung Galaxy S7 Benchmarks Leak
11 hours ago | Natasha Lomas
Latest From Social
* Canvs Raises $5.6M To Help TV Networks Track Viewers’ Emotions
Canvs Raises $5.6M To Help TV Networks Track Viewers’ Emotions
22 hours ago | Anthony Ha
* Facebook’s Engineering Wizardry Makes Even VR Videos Load Fast
Facebook’s Engineering Wizardry Makes Even VR Videos Load Fast
yesterday | Josh Constine
* Facebook Yells “Sportsball!”
Facebook Yells “Sportsball!”
yesterday | Josh Constine
* Waldo Raises $5 Million For A Photo-Finding Platform Targeting
Professional Photographers & Events
Waldo Raises $5 Million For A Photo-Finding Platform Targeting Professional
Photographers & Events
yesterday | Sarah Perez
Up Next
Millennials Are Destroying Banks, And It’s The Banks’ Fault
Posted May 30, 2015
CrunchBoard
Job Listings
*
Principal Analyst - Marketing Technology
CarMax
*
Architect - Enterprise Information
CarMax
*
Senior Software Developer - Web Development
CarMax
*
Online Systems Platform Manager
CarMax
*
Team Manager- CRM
CarMax
More from CrunchBoard
Advertisement
TechCrunch
[crunch-network.jpg]
* News
* TCTV
* Events
* CrunchBase
About
* Staff
* Contact Us
* Advertise With Us
* Send Us A Tip
International
* China
* Europe
* Japan
Follow TechCrunch
* Facebook
* Twitter
* Google+
* LinkedIn
* Youtube
* Pinterest
* Tumblr
* Instagram
* StumbleUpon
* Feed
TechCrunch Apps
* iOS
* Android
* Windows 8
Subscribe to TechCrunch Daily
Latest headlines delivered to you daily
[X]
Subscribe to Subscribe to TechCrunch
Daily
Enter Email Address ____________________ (BUTTON) Subscribe
© 2013-2016 AOL Inc. All rights reserved. Aol Tech Privacy Policy About
Our Ads Anti Harassment Policy Terms of Service
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
Fonts by
[b?c1=2&c2=6036210&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=1.3&cj=1]
* TechCrunch (BUTTON)
*
News
+ Startups
+ Mobile
+ Gadgets
+ Enterprise
+ Social
+ Europe
+ Asia
+ Old Crunch Network
+ Unicorn Leaderboard
+ Gift Guides
+ All Galleries
Videos
* Apps
* Breaking News
* Bullish
* Crunch Report
* CES 2016
* All Shows
* All Videos
Events
* Disrupt
* Startup Battlefield
* Crunchies
* Meetups
* International City Events
* Hackathon
* Include
* NFL’s 1ST and Future
* TC Davos 2016
* All Events
CrunchBase
____________________ (BUTTON)
(BUTTON)
Most Popular
Get Ready For A Smaller iPhone 6s Mini
4 hours ago by Romain Dillet
A Day After Launch, “Exploding Kittens” Tops The App Store
1 hour ago by Sarah Perez
Forthcoming Samsung Galaxy S7 Benchmarks Leak
11 hours ago by Natasha Lomas
Netflix Makes Good On Promises To Crack Down On VPNs, But Blocks
Are Short-Lived
5 hours ago by Sarah Perez
Why Cloud Computing Will Shake Up Security
2 hours ago by Tom Gillis
Apple Has A New Apple TV Ad, And It’s All About Apps
1 hour ago by Romain Dillet
SpaceX Tested Its Capsule That Will Send Humans To Space
1 hour ago by Emily Calandrelli
These Are The Most-Watched Vines Of The Year
5 hours ago by Jordan Crook
Google Reportedly Paid Apple $1B In 2014 To Remain Default Search
Engine On iOS
17 hours ago by Jon Russell