* WSJEurope + WSJEurope + Facebook + Twitter * WSJ Live + WSJ Live * Market Watch + Market Watch * Barron's + Barron's * All Things Digital + All Things Digital * Factiva + Factiva * Risk + Risk * More + WSJ X - Invitation Only + New Portfolio + BigCharts + Financial News + Professor Journal + SmartMoney + Student Journal + Virtual Stock Exchange + WSJ Classifieds + WSJ Classroom + WSJ Radio + WSJ Wine News, Quotes, Companies, Vid (BUTTON) SEARCH ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________

_____________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________

___________________________________________________

____________________________________________________ The Wall Street Journal * Subscribe * Log In Europe Edition * U.S. * Asia * Europe * América Latina * Brasil * 中文-简体(China) * Deutschland * India * Indonesia * 日本(Japan) * 한국(Korea) * Home * World » More World » More Loading… * Europe » More Europe » More Loading… * U.K. » More U.K. » More Loading… * U.S. » More U.S. » More Loading… * Business » More Business » More Loading… * Markets » More Markets » More Loading… * Market Data » More Market Data » More Loading… * Tech » More Tech » More Loading… * Life & Culture » More Life & Culture » More Loading… * Opinion » More Opinion » More Loading… * Heard on the Street * Property » More Property » More Loading… * Peggy Noonan's Blog * Leisure & Arts * Letters to the Editor * Political Diary * Discussion Groups * Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool at the bottom of any article or visit www.djreprints.com See a sample reprint in PDF format. Order a reprint of this article now * The Wall Street Journal * OPINION * February 21, 2012 The U.N. Threat to Internet Freedom Top-down, international regulation is antithetical to the Net, which has flourished under its current governance model. * Article * Comments more in Opinion | Find New $LINKTEXTFIND$ » * smaller * Larger By ROBERT M. MCDOWELL On Feb. 27, a diplomatic process will begin in Geneva that could result in a new treaty giving the United Nations unprecedented powers over the Internet. Dozens of countries, including Russia and China, are pushing hard to reach this goal by year's end. As Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said last June, his goal and that of his allies is to establish "international control over the Internet" through the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a treaty-based organization under U.N. auspices. If successful, these new regulatory proposals would upend the Internet's flourishing regime, which has been in place since 1988. That year, delegates from 114 countries gathered in Australia to agree to a treaty that set the stage for dramatic liberalization of international telecommunications. This insulated the Internet from economic and technical regulation and quickly became the greatest deregulatory success story of all time. Since the Net's inception, engineers, academics, user groups and others have convened in bottom-up nongovernmental organizations to keep it operating and thriving through what is known as a "multi-stakeholder" governance model. This consensus-driven private-sector approach has been the key to the Net's phenomenal success. In 1995, shortly after it was privatized, only 16 million people used the Internet world-wide. By 2011, more than two billion were online—and that number is growing by as much as half a million every day. This explosive growth is the direct result of governments generally keeping their hands off the Internet sphere. Net access, especially through mobile devices, is improving the human condition more quickly—and more fundamentally—than any other technology in history. Nowhere is this more true than in the developing world, where unfettered Internet technologies are expanding economies and raising living standards. Enlarge Image mcdowell Close mcdowell Corbis Farmers who live far from markets are now able to find buyers for their crops through their Internet-connected mobile devices without assuming the risks and expenses of traveling with their goods. Worried parents are able to go online to locate medicine for their sick children. And proponents of political freedom are better able to share information and organize support to break down the walls of tyranny. The Internet has also been a net job creator. A recent McKinsey study found that for every job disrupted by Internet connectivity, 2.6 new jobs are created. It is no coincidence that these wonderful developments blossomed as the Internet migrated further away from government control. Today, however, Russia, China and their allies within the 193 member states of the ITU want to renegotiate the 1988 treaty to expand its reach into previously unregulated areas. Reading even a partial list of proposals that could be codified into international law next December at a conference in Dubai is chilling: • Subject cyber security and data privacy to international control; • Allow foreign phone companies to charge fees for "international" Internet traffic, perhaps even on a "per-click" basis for certain Web destinations, with the goal of generating revenue for state-owned phone companies and government treasuries; • Impose unprecedented economic regulations such as mandates for rates, terms and conditions for currently unregulated traffic-swapping agreements known as "peering." • Establish for the first time ITU dominion over important functions of multi-stakeholder Internet governance entities such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the nonprofit entity that coordinates the .com and .org Web addresses of the world; • Subsume under intergovernmental control many functions of the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Internet Society and other multi-stakeholder groups that establish the engineering and technical standards that allow the Internet to work; • Regulate international mobile roaming rates and practices. Many countries in the developing world, including India and Brazil, are particularly intrigued by these ideas. Even though Internet-based technologies are improving billions of lives everywhere, some governments feel excluded and want more control. And let's face it, strong-arm regimes are threatened by popular outcries for political freedom that are empowered by unfettered Internet connectivity. They have formed impressive coalitions, and their efforts have progressed significantly. Merely saying "no" to any changes to the current structure of Internet governance is likely to be a losing proposition. A more successful strategy would be for proponents of Internet freedom and prosperity within every nation to encourage a dialogue among all interested parties, including governments and the ITU, to broaden the multi-stakeholder umbrella with the goal of reaching consensus to address reasonable concerns. As part of this conversation, we should underscore the tremendous benefits that the Internet has yielded for the developing world through the multi-stakeholder model. Upending this model with a new regulatory treaty is likely to partition the Internet as some countries would inevitably choose to opt out. A balkanized Internet would be devastating to global free trade and national sovereignty. It would impair Internet growth most severely in the developing world but also globally as technologists are forced to seek bureaucratic permission to innovate and invest. This would also undermine the proliferation of new cross-border technologies, such as cloud computing. A top-down, centralized, international regulatory overlay is antithetical to the architecture of the Net, which is a global network of networks without borders. No government, let alone an intergovernmental body, can make engineering and economic decisions in lightning-fast Internet time. Productivity, rising living standards and the spread of freedom everywhere, but especially in the developing world, would grind to a halt as engineering and business decisions become politically paralyzed within a global regulatory body. Any attempts to expand intergovernmental powers over the Internet—no matter how incremental or seemingly innocuous—should be turned back. Modernization and reform can be constructive, but not if the end result is a new global bureaucracy that departs from the multi-stakeholder model. Enlightened nations should draw a line in the sand against new regulations while welcoming reform that could include a nonregulatory role for the ITU. Pro-regulation forces are, thus far, much more energized and organized than those who favor the multi-stakeholder approach. Regulation proponents only need to secure a simple majority of the 193 member states to codify their radical and counterproductive agenda. Unlike the U.N. Security Council, no country can wield a veto in ITU proceedings. With this in mind, some estimate that approximately 90 countries could be supporting intergovernmental Net regulation—a mere seven short of a majority. While precious time ticks away, the U.S. has not named a leader for the treaty negotiation. We must awake from our slumber and engage before it is too late. Not only do these developments have the potential to affect the daily lives of all Americans, they also threaten freedom and prosperity across the globe. Mr. McDowell is a commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission. Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com Join the discussion More In Opinion » * image Subscriber Content Read Preview Investoren haben wieder Lust auf Problem-Immobilien * In Spanien beginnt die Schnäppchenjagd auf Immobilien * Nächste Runde im EU-Budgetstreit steht an close Email This Recipient's Email Address (Separate multiple address with commas) ____________________ Your Email Address ____________________ Message (Optional) ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ [X] Send me a copy Send or Cancel close Thank You Your email has been sent. close Error. An error has occured and your email has not been sent. Please try again. • Invalid email address. • You can't enter more than 20 emails. • Seperate multiple addresses with Commas. • Must enter an email address. • You must enter the verification code below to send. • Invalid entry: Please type the verification code again. * Back To * Voltar ao * Back To * * MSN Money Homepage * MSN Money Investing Available to WSJ.com Subscribers * [RV-AI989_ANTIDO_C_20121207004152.jpg] Subscriber Content Read Preview The Power of Negative Thinking * [OB-WG062_0205cb_C_20130205150339.jpg] Subscriber Content Read Preview CBO Sees Rising U.S. Debt, 2014 Rebound * [OB-WF977_0205sa_C_20130205114857.jpg] Subscriber Content Read Preview U.S., S&P Settle In for Bitter Combat * Subscriber Content Read Preview Commodity Indexes See Investor Exit Pension funds and other institutions are retreating from popular investments linked to commodities after finding they did little to protect their portfolios against inflation risk and the unpredictable returns of stocks. Most Popular in Europe * Bulky Tablet That's Laptop Lite * Virgin Media Should Hand Over the Keys * Tsunami Destroys Villages in Solomons * It Takes Planning, Caution to Avoid Being 'It' * Microsoft Takes a Side in PC Wars From the HomePage * [image] RBS Settles Rate Charges U.S. and U.K. authorities have fined Royal Bank of Scotland more than $610 million for its role in the manipulation of a key global interest rate. * [image] ECB Still Searching for Real-Economy Fix As the European Central Bank meets Thursday, the final link in the chain—lower interest rates to households and small businesses—remains broken. * Subscriber Content Read Preview [image] A New Lucrative Middle in Apparel Prices The middle ground in fashion between luxury and mass market is finding fresh appeal, and French boutique apparel brands including Sandro, Claudie Pierlot, the Kooples, and Zadig & Voltaire are expanding in the U.S. * [image] Labels Scale Up for Year of the Snake The Lunar New Year arrives Feb. 10, bringing with it a new animal: the snake. The holiday also ushers in a beast of a shopping season that this year is stretching from boutiques in Beijing to Beverly Hills. More in Opinion * Payback for a Downgrade? * Andrew Roberts: Shakespeare Has a (Parking) Lot to Answer For * Robert Zoellick: A New U.S. International Economic Strategy * King Richard Remains * A Fiscal Fantasy Most Popular In Europe * Read * Emailed * Video * Commented * 1. Bulky Tablet That's Laptop Lite * Subscriber Content Read Preview 2. Virgin Media Should Hand Over the Keys * 3. Tsunami Destroys Villages in Solomons * 4. It Takes Planning, Caution to Avoid Being 'It' * 5. Microsoft Takes a Side in PC Wars * 1. Saudi Arabia Replaces Market Regulator * 2. 'Minecraft' Hits Mother Lode * 3. Ireland 'Bad Bank' Tries to Make Good With Sales * 4. Troubled European Assets Come to Market * 5. In Spain, a Property Bargain-Hunter's Dream * 1. Mossberg Reviews the Surface Windows 8 Pro * 2. Apple Announces Largest iPad Yet * 3. Transparent Style, See-Through Risks * 4. Why Clothes Might Not Be Made in China Much Longer * 5. Swedish Tech Company Strikes Gold Mine * 1. Senate to Move on Gun Control657 comments * 2. Opinion: Barack Obama, Straight Shooter?588 comments * 3. Opinion: Payback for a Downgrade?473 comments * 4. Boy Scouts Postpone Decision on Gay Members450 comments * 5. Obama Presses Plan to Delay Spending Cuts386 comments * Articles Feed * Most Emailed Feed * Most Popular Video Feed * Most Commented Feed * Most Popular Feeds Editors' Picks * [image] Taking a Tougher Stand on CEOs With Bad Returns * [image] Twitter on Route to Maturity—Maybe IPO * [image] At These Olympics, It Helps to Have Strong Teeth * [image] Cat Added to Monopoly's Token Lineup * After Dell Deal, What's Next for H-P? Dell goes private, leaving questions open for Hewlett-Packard. Could a split be coming? Video * previous * * next * Opinion: Obama's Spend, Borrow and Tax Plan 4:20 * Opinion: Best States to Do Business 4:55 * Opinion: Obama's Drone Memo 4:40 Question of the Day In your experience, is your dog smarter than your cat? Tell us more in the comments tab. 1. (*) Dog 2. ( ) Cat [BUTTON Input] (not implemented)___________ View Results » Most Recommended * CommentsComments * CommentersCommenters * 1. “Obama's enemy isn't the Republic...;” - Mary Childs 247 Recommendations * 2. “This is consistent with Obama's...;” - Jonathan Murray 189 Recommendations * 3. “"We have to pass it so you...;” - Brian Horey 145 Recommendations * 4. “Mr. Murray, Great post. Those wh...;” - Donald Randolph 135 Recommendations * 5. “You may succeed in preventing yo...;” - Karl Wright 130 Recommendations * Greg Liautaud 2451 Recommendations * Mary Childs 2164 Recommendations * David Zamos 1411 Recommendations * James Doppelheuer 1338 Recommendations * Jonathan Murray 1313 Recommendations Most Active Discussions * Journal Community * Question of the Day Will you miss mail delivery on Saturdays? * Libertarians Why should gays care about the Boy Scouts? Why can't they ban the Boy Scouts instead of just being banned by it? * Religion & Ethics Do we need religion to have ethics? Is it possible that a world without religion can be, on the whole, a better place to live? * Libertarians Debt Ceiling * Question of the Day In your experience, is your dog smarter than your cat? * See all Discussion Groups More in Opinion * Payback for a Downgrade? * Andrew Roberts: Shakespeare Has a (Parking) Lot to Answer For * Robert Zoellick: A New U.S. International Economic Strategy * King Richard Remains * A Fiscal Fantasy