#News for nerds, stuff that matters Search Slashdot Slashdot RSS Slashdot Stories Slash Boxes Comments ____________________ Search * Join * Login * Submit * Newsletter * Jobs * Resources * Channels SlashBI SlashCloud SlashDataCenter * SlashTV Nickname: ____________________ Password: ____________________ [ ] Public Terminal __________________________________________________________________ Log In Forgot your password? http://_________________________ Log in with OpenID Close binspamdupenotthebestofftopicslownewsdaystalestupid freshfunnyinsightfulinterestingmaybe offtopicflamebaittrollredundantoverrated insightfulinterestinginformativefunnyunderrated descriptive typodupeerror * Stories * Submissions * Popular * Blog Slashdot * * Ask Slashdot * Book Reviews * Games * Idle * YRO * * Cloud * Hardware * Linux * Management * Mobile * Science * Security * Storage 41007801 story China Government The Internet Your Rights Online Russia and China Withdraw Bid For Internet Control 115 Posted by samzenpus on Monday December 10, @08:50AM from the on-second-thought dept. judgecorp writes "Russia, China and other nations have withdrawn proposals to take control over the Internet within their borders. The proposals, handed to the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) on Friday, caused widespread dismay and protest. The WCIT event in Dubai, run by the UN agency ITU, is working on new International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs) which are due for their first revision since the emergence of the mass Internet. The line-up of nations wanting to formalize their power to restrict the Internet included Russia, China, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Sudan and Egypt. Their proposal has been withdrawn without explanation, an ITU spokesperson confirmed." twitter facebook Share on Google+ apply tags china russia yro <- Related Links -> Draft of IPCC 2013 Report Already Circulating Russia, China, and Others Seek Greater Control Over Internet Submission: Russia And China Withdraw Bid for Internet Control Behavior of Birds Depends On Their Hatching Order This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted. Russia and China Withdraw Bid For Internet Control More Login Russia and China Withdraw Bid For Internet Control (BUTTON) Archived Discussion Load All Comments Full Abbreviated Hidden /Sea Score: 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 More Login Nickname: ____________________ Password: ____________________ [ ] Public Terminal __________________________________________________________________ Log In Forgot your password? http://_________________________ Log in with OpenID Close Close Search 115 Comments Log In/Create an Account Comments Filter: * All * Insightful * Informative * Interesting * Funny The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. * Uh oh (Score:5, Insightful) by Jetra (2622687) writes: on Monday December 10, @08:57AM (#42241553) I think our "friends" may have learned some tricks from here in America. Prepare for drafts with a lot of double-speak that is going to be pushed quickly and with as little media attention as possible. Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + + Re:Uh oh (Score:5, Insightful) by dintech (998802) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:05AM (#42241643) "The global body didn't let us do what we wanted so we're just going to fucking go our own way anyway." Looks like they learned from the WMD/Iraq War debacle... Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ o o # # Re: (Score:3) by Koreantoast (527520) writes: I think in the case of the two nations named, China and Russia, they really don't give a damn about what the good ol' USA thinks. @ o 1 reply beneath your current threshold. + Re: (Score:2) by grumpyman (849537) writes: In the US, this is about national security and sovereignty issue, why bring it up at UN, or for the matter, anywhere? o + Re: (Score:3) by flyneye (84093) writes: No, they just buckled to my criticism and taunting, as per usual. I graciously await your praise and gratitude..... o * Withdrawn without explanation (Score:4, Insightful) by the grace of R'hllor (530051) writes: on Monday December 10, @08:58AM (#42241565) So in exchange for shutting up about it, they'll probably get it officiously, thanks to nations who also want full control but didn't formally ask for it (ie, all of them?). Or am I being paranoid? Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + + Re:Withdrawn without explanation (Score:4, Interesting) by mwvdlee (775178) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:03AM (#42241611) Homepage Do they really have to ask, as long as it's within their borders? If they wish to break the internet within their own borders, who will be able to stop them? Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ o o # # Re: (Score:1) by Anonymous Coward writes: I don't think we have a complex. We just like fucking with people. :) @ # @ # @ @ Re: (Score:2) by edibobb (113989) writes: Most people around the world don't hate the U.S. The term for thinking that is "paranoia", or possibly "the media". - - Re: (Score:3) by dinfinity (2300094) writes: Yes, we do ;-) = = * * Re: (Score:2) by dinfinity (2300094) writes: Were you talking to me or to edibobb? + # 2 replies beneath your current threshold. o # # Re: (Score:2) by kilfarsnar (561956) writes: Unfortunately, it's not that new of an export. @ @ - @ 1 reply beneath your current threshold. # Re:Withdrawn without explanation (Score:5, Insightful) by Opportunist (166417) writes: on Monday December 10, @11:09AM (#42242867) It's nice that America exports Democracy, but I'd say they should at least keep a little bit for themselves, I notice a shortage. Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ @ # Re: (Score:2) by theshowmecanuck (703852) writes: Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere. Sit in your safe home and pontificate while others live in societies with secret police and dictators. The sad part of this is that America has slipped so badly they only lack the dictator part. But since government is already bought and paid for, maybe that part is already a forgone conclusion. @ o Re:Withdrawn without explanation (Score:5, Insightful) by vlm (69642) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:28AM (#42241893) Do they really have to ask, as long as it's within their borders? Extradition treaties. You live in .us and uploaded a wedding picture of your wife showing bare ankles to facebook? Hopefully the religious authorities in Afghanistan will be lenient with your extradited there for punishment ... all in exchange for other countries extraditing I.P. violators to the USA. Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ # # Re: (Score:2, Troll) by CanHasDIY (1672858) writes: Do they really have to ask, as long as it's within their borders? Extradition treaties. You live in .us and uploaded a wedding picture of your wife showing bare ankles to facebook? Hopefully the religious authorities in Afghanistan will be lenient with your extradited there for punishment ... all in exchange for other countries extraditing I.P. violators to the USA. Yea. And Obama's gonna take away yer guns, PPACA sets up death panels for granny, FEMA is building concentration camps in Louisiana, et. al. Kriminy... @ @ Re: (Score:3) by vlm (69642) writes: You write as if people haven't served jail time after being extradited across the country for running pr0n BBS or in custody today for doing things illegal in the US while in a foreign country? - - Re: (Score:2) by CanHasDIY (1672858) writes: You write as if people haven't served jail time after being extradited across the country for running pr0n BBS or in custody today for doing things illegal in the US while in a foreign country? You write as if source citation is unnecessary, as though everyone else on the planet has had the exact same experience and exposure as yourself. = = Re: (Score:2) by AlphaWolf_HK (692722) writes: I think the whole Megaupload thing should speak for itself. How long have you been reading slashdot? This is frequently discussed here, along with numerous other similar incidents. I think you're so entrenched in this "us vs them" partisan mess to see past the mistakes of your chosen sports team. That's all that partisan politics is, it's about as much without reason as steelers fans hating cowboys fans. Given that this is slashdot, which is typically left leaning, chances are that both of the guys you are ar * * Re: (Score:2) by CanHasDIY (1672858) writes: I think the whole Megaupload thing should speak for itself If Dotcom were an American citizen, extradited to another country, then yea, that'd be a great example. But he's not, so it's not. vlm specifically implied that Americans are being extradited to other countries for doing things that aren't illegal in America - I contend that point, and the lack of supporting citation. I think you're so entrenched in this "us vs them" partisan mess to see past the mistakes of your chosen sports team. And I think you're reading too much into the specific words I wrote, and not enough into the context. Hint: It has far less to do with partisan politics than you think, and far more to do wit + + Re: (Score:2) by AlphaWolf_HK (692722) writes: vlm specifically implied that Americans are being extradited to other countries for doing things that aren't illegal in America - I contend that point, and the lack of supporting citation. No, read his post, he said doing things illegal in the US (as in, against the law in the US) while being in a foreign country. Although Dotcom hasn't been extradited yet, they are pushing for it, and they have successfully extradited other people who have never set foot in the US. You probably shouldn't throw stones from a glass house, by the way (see your first sentece below.) And I think you're reading too much into the specific words I wrote, and not enough into the context. Hint: It has far less to do with partisan politics than you think, and far more to do with shit tin-foil-hat-crazy people say. Well, the "shit tin-foil-hat-crazy people say" about Obama and firearms is correct. Obama said he wants to "reintroduce the ban on as o o Re: (Score:2) by CanHasDIY (1672858) writes: vlm specifically implied that Americans are being extradited to other countries for doing things that aren't illegal in America - I contend that point, and the lack of supporting citation. No, read his post, he said doing things illegal in the US (as in, against the law in the US) while being in a foreign country. That's a negatory, Ghostrider. vlm's post, verbatim: Extradition treaties. You live in .us and uploaded a wedding picture of your wife showing bare ankles to facebook? Hopefully the religious authorities in Afghanistan will be lenient with your extradited there for punishment ... all in exchange for other countries extraditing I.P. violators to the USA. Phrases such as "you live in .us" and "authorities in Afghanistan... you['re] extradited there" makes it pretty obvious he's talking about US citizens bein # o Re: (Score:2) by AlphaWolf_HK (692722) writes: You said this: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3 306563&cid=42244709 [slashdot.org] Which was in reply to this: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3 306563&cid=42243221 [slashdot.org] And then I replied to you. Seriously unless you've been under a rock, that's like asking somebody to cite the first amendment. As for the part you quoted, of course he wasn't saying that actually happened, so why on earth would he cite anything? He was speaking hypothetically of what could happen if they decided to do the same thing that the US curre # o Re: (Score:1) by HappyPsycho (1724746) writes: I've been curious about this as well, China's great firewall and the various outages of countries from the internet seem to indicate they already have what is being asked for (at least on the surface). What I think they are trying to do is push that view out to the rest of the Internet, which I would like to hope the UN / ITU is smart enough to determine. # o 2 replies beneath your current threshold. + Re: (Score:2) by kilfarsnar (561956) writes: So in exchange for shutting up about it, they'll probably get it officiously, thanks to nations who also want full control but didn't formally ask for it (ie, all of them?). Or am I being paranoid? Maybe, because I'm fairly paranoid myself. But I thought more or less the same thing. o + o + Re: (Score:3) by interkin3tic (1469267) writes: Or am I being paranoid? "Paranoid," when talking about governments and your freedoms, is short for "not an idiot." o + 1 reply beneath your current threshold. * Russia and China (Score:1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward writes: Allowing Russia and China to have any say over anyone or anything is tantamount to giving the fox access to the chicken coop. + + o + They already have control, of themselves (Score:5, Insightful) by Kludge (13653) writes: on Monday December 10, @10:19AM (#42242389) I really don't get all this "control of the internet" hoopla. The reality is that anyone can run a DNS server. These countries can run one of their own if they don't like ours. They can also put whatever firewall they choose on the lines going in and out of their countries. They already have as much control as they choose to have. What is the point of having some international governing body? I'm not getting it. Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ o o # o Re: (Score:3) by mu51c10rd (187182) writes: Think lower level than DNS. What happens when there is no central body over IP addresses? Will your traffic to x.x.x.x get routed to country Y or country Z? # o Re: (Score:2) by AlphaWolf_HK (692722) writes: I think you ought to read up on IP routing and border gateway protocol. Specifically, look at what happened when Pakistan blocked YouTube. If you have people fighting over IP assignments, which the US controls, then you have a real mess on your hands. We'd be totally screwed without centralized IP addressing. # o 1 reply beneath your current threshold. + 1 reply beneath your current threshold. * Close shave (Score:5, Interesting) by Twinbee (767046) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:00AM (#42241587) Homepage It'll be a very long time before world peace is achieved, but this news may have potentially cut that time by decades or even centuries. Language, currency and cultures often divide us, but the internet is one of the things unified in this world. Long may it stay that way. Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + + Re: (Score:2) by ultranova (717540) writes: It'll be a very long time before world peace is achieved, Isn't the world pretty much at peace right now? What major wars are going on at the moment? o o Re:Close shave (Score:5, Informative) by SJHillman (1966756) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:17AM (#42241793) Peace means more than just "no major wars" Wikipedia has a nice list of conflicts that are still ongoing (be it cold, warm or hot conflicts): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_military_con flicts [wikipedia.org] And just stay tuned, more are sure to come! Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ # # Re:Close shave (Score:4, Informative) by fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:31AM (#42241915) Journal There are definitely some nasty little meatgrinders going on(and, depending on how exactly you want to tot them up, a fair amount of violence-application by internal security forces whose targets are mostly too outmatched for it to even count as 'conflict'); but by historical standards that's pretty good. The Syrian civil war, for instance, killed about as many people, per year, as motor vehicle accidents do in the US(the US population is higher, obviously, so the individual risk of death is lower). Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ @ # Re: (Score:3) by Chris Mattern (191822) writes: Peace means more than just "no major wars" Maybe so, but "no major wars" is certainly a nice step in the right direction. The world has been getting more peaceful for some time now, little as you would realize it from the TV news. @ o Re: (Score:2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward writes: lets see now shall we, Afghanistan is still an ongoing diaster, Israel and palastine are going at like there's no tomorrow with Iran standing none to calmly on the side, china and japan hate each others guts, North Korean is trying to blow the South Koreans to hell and back and lets not even go into everything that's happening in Africa # # Re: (Score:2) by ultranova (717540) writes: Afghanistan is still an ongoing diaster, Just as it has been to every occupying force throughout all human history. Israel and palastine are going at like there's no tomorrow with Iran standing none to calmly on the side, Business as usual. Middle East is the world's ulcer and will remain so for the forseeable future, but it's not going to result in any large-scale conflicts. china and japan hate each others guts, They can hate each other all they want but what are they actually going to do about it? Nothing @ o Re: (Score:2) by degeneratemonkey (1405019) writes: Yes and no. The world is, in general, more at peace than at any other point in human history. So in relative terms, yes. In absolute terms, no. There are still lots of first-world-funded conflicts going on. There are still genocidal dictators. Life in North Korea can hardly be described as "peaceful." People are being killed every day for petty disputes over land, religion, and politics. We've got a lot of problems. We're just better than we've been. It's a start. # # Re: (Score:2) by fredprado (2569351) writes: And probably the end. in all likelihood there will never be absolute peace. What we have today is probably the best we can get. @ + Re: (Score:3) by Grizzley9 (1407005) writes: It'll be a very long time before world peace is achieved, That depends highly on your definition of "world peace". o o Re: (Score:2) by Grand Facade (35180) writes: With liberty and justice for the One Corporation that will eventually own everything # o Re: (Score:2) by Githaron (2462596) writes: It'll be a very long time before world peace is achieved, That depends highly on your definition of "world peace". That is the exact reason "world peace" will never be achieved. No one can agree on the definition and there is always someone who is willing to force their views on other by the point of a knife/gun/warhead. # # Re: (Score:2) by fredprado (2569351) writes: Absence of conflict can only be achieved by the complete suppression of human instinct and individuality. It is nigh impossible outside some kind of Orwellian Dystopia. @ + Re: (Score:3, Interesting) by JoshuaZ (1134087) writes: Language, currency and cultures often divide us, but the internet is one of the things unified in this world. Unfortunately, the internet in many ways divides us. It used to be that people needed to be geographically proximate to form in-groups that were culturally distinct and had distinct ideologies. Now, people can easily form groups with people from very far away, and then only focus their information sources and ideologically affiliated sources. Thus, you can get conservatives who only read right-wing websites, and similarly for liberals, or anarchists, or monarchist, etc. It is likely that the internet can ea o o Re: (Score:2) by vlm (69642) writes: And if there's one thing the last few hundred years of history have taught us, it is that people are willing to kill over abstract ideals even when they share culture, currency and language. And they usually behave themselves when there's direct economic contact... True, a world of 4chan or xbox voice chat would be pretty messed up, but a world of deal extreme and ebay wouldn't be nearly as bad. # + Re: (Score:2) by LynnwoodRooster (966895) writes: Language, currency and cultures often divide us, but the internet is one of the things unified in this world. Long may it stay that way. Obviously you've stayed out of the iOS/Android fanboi fights... o o Re: (Score:2) by hajus (990255) writes: M'eh, that's more like sports fanboism than a war. # + Re: (Score:2) by antdude (79039) writes: More like never. Only God can do that. :( o + o o Re: (Score:2) by Twinbee (767046) writes: As this story testifies, fragmenting the internet is a very painful thing to do, as it should be. That's the reality. # + 1 reply beneath your current threshold. * The Pattern (Score:4, Insightful) by ios and web coder (2552484) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:01AM (#42241599) 1) Make a huge noise about implementing draconian measures. 2) Withdraw these measures after the hue and cry. 3) Propose more "reasonable" measures that will, after the dust settles, actually end up giving more control. This is how our gas prices keep going up. They jack the prices up by a dollar, then back down 80 cents. Repeat as necessary. Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + + o o Re: (Score:1) by ios and web coder (2552484) writes: *shrug* Whatever. I paid $3.89 the last time I filled up. It seems only yesterday (before Sandy) that it was $3.40. It all comes out in the rinse or the wash. I guess you don't deal much with Marketing types. They all think that way. And they are correct. They get results. # # @ # Re: (Score:2) by Muad'Dave (255648) writes: Ouch! I saw regular for $3.0799 the other day at a Wawa station here in the Richmond VA area. @ # 1 reply beneath your current threshold. o Re: (Score:3) by runeghost (2509522) writes: It doesn't take a conspiracy, just powerful and privileged players who each act to benefit themselves at the expense of the public. # o Re: (Score:3) by Worthless_Comments (987427) writes: Uh..the gas prices ARE manipulated. OPEC is a (legal) cartel. What is it you think cartels do? # # @ @ Re: (Score:2) by Sun.Jedi (1280674) writes: While I fully agree with what you just said, what do you imagine happens to the price of a commodity with finite (and thus diminishing) supply and increasing demand? We won't have to worry about running out of oil for a bit; somewhere around 100 years depending on which source you believe. The price fluctuation is a game for profits, nothing more. This can be observed by the distribution stream,where people are paid NOT to produce at full potential, creating false demand. Also, the futures are suspect when a moth farts somewhere in the Middle East and the price immediately goes up -at the pump-, but there are no outcomes (aside from near miss global economic failure a - # 1 reply beneath your current threshold. o Re:The Pattern (Score:4, Informative) by kilfarsnar (561956) writes: on Monday December 10, @10:06AM (#42242277) "they?" A Conspiracy!! Yep, that's it, numerous oil companies, some nationalized and some privatized, shipping companies, refiners, governments, etc. all got together and decided that you needed to have higher prices, and kept the manipulation secret...those sneaky bastards. You know, the Sun keeps rising and falling in the sky....a Conspiracy!! Right, because price fixing never happens and every bad act is eventually found out. No one ever gets away with anything, and the Authorities are always on the up and up. How could it be otherwise? After all, wealthy powerful people usually come to and maintain their power through honesty and transparency. Really, there is no conspiracy necessary for those with like interests to work together to forward those interests. It's quite natural. However, contrary to your insinuation, conspiracies do happen and some are actually kept secret. It's really not that hard. The people involved just have to all benefit from the secret. If you were making billions of dollars through some conspiracy, why on earth would you ever tell anyone? Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ # + o o # # @ # Re: (Score:2) by Ginger Unicorn (952287) writes: You have no idea how to punctuate a question, do you? @ # 1 reply beneath your current threshold. o 1 reply beneath your current threshold. + Re: (Score:1) by bbelt16ag (744938) writes: ride a bike or move kiddio. global climate change will demand it. o + Re: (Score:1) by Anonymous Coward writes: The price movements you describe sounds like the long-term price of a successful stock. Or the long-term price of a commodity that is valued based on a steadily inflating currency (US dollars). Like oil. I'm honestly struggling to see the "insight" within your post. o o # # @ # 1 reply beneath your current threshold. o 1 reply beneath your current threshold. + Re: (Score:2) by Scarred Intellect (1648867) writes: This is how our gas prices keep going up. They jack the prices up by a dollar, then back down 80 cents. Repeat as necessary. True story in Washington. (Someone correct me on the details if I'm wrong) I was told that our Senator, Maria Cantwell, threatened to investigate the oil companies for price gouging the Pacific Northwest; they dropped prices (by almost $0.60/gal for diesel) and she dropped the investigation. Gas prices have steadily gone back up to where they were before, and I hear she's threatening to investigate again. o + 2 replies beneath your current threshold. * translation (Score:5, Funny) by slashmydots (2189826) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:03AM (#42241613) "Mommy, the other countries laughed at us and made fun of our idea!" Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + * + + Re: (Score:2) by halfkoreanamerican (2566687) writes: People might also fear that young, impressionable boys, will learn of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln and we might get some humans with backbone again. That would cause governments real trouble too. It seems they are afraid of anything that might take away their power, much like the North Korean regime. If it's not from them, created by them, for their purposes, it's evil. o + Re:The breakup is coming (Score:4, Funny) by invid (163714) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:24AM (#42241855) Homepage If humanity can't survive the free flow of information and has to limit it, it will be out-competed by an extraterrestrial civilization that can. (I'm talking long term, like million years) Parent Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ o * + * Summary is biased (Score:5, Interesting) by Dan East (318230) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:31AM (#42241913) Homepage Journal This summary is slanted and biased: "proposals to take control over the Internet within their borders". The text "within their borders" has been added by the submitter - the word "border" isn't even in the document that text links to. Countries already have control over the internet "within their borders", just like they have control over everything else within their borders. They were seeking control *outside* their borders, to force outside companies to have to pay them to deliver content. What these countries are wanting (among other things) is the ability to force content producers, like Google's YouTube, to have to pay their ISPs in order to be able to deliver content at a "quality" level to their citizens. In other words, there are countries that want the US to have to pay them so their population can consume content created by the US. If Google deems it wise to invest in a country's infrastructure so that more people in that country can (for example) watch YouTube videos at a certain level of quality, then that's Google's prerogative. They shouldn't be forced. Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + + o + o + 2 replies beneath your current threshold. * The USA is not perfect but.... (Score:5, Insightful) by cryfreedomlove (929828) writes: on Monday December 10, @09:37AM (#42241981) The cast of countries that submitted this proposal all share a common trait of disrespecting the freedom of expression of their own citizens. This disrespect is rooted in fear. These governments see their own citizenry as a threat to their own power, especially if those citizens can read anything they want on the global internet. Share twitter facebook Share on Google+ + + o + Re: (Score:2) by ThatsNotPudding (1045640) writes: The cast of countries that submitted this proposal all share a common trait of disrespecting the freedom of expression of their own citizens. And one US party wants to implement exactly that - just as Jesus would do. o + 1 reply beneath your current threshold. * + + o + 1 reply beneath your current threshold. * + * Why the UN to begin with? (Score:1) by Anonymous Coward writes: To be honest I don't see why the UN would have to be involved in this to begin with. If China, Russia plus various Islamist countries are so concerned about content on the Internet, exactly what is stopping them from deploying their own parallel DNS system within their borders? If they want to set up their own non-ICANN sanctioned .com, .net and .org root servers and then force their ISPs to use those I'm sure they can do it already without UN involvement. Sure, they will invoke the rage of their citizens a + * The Net is a game changer even with censorship (Score:2) by InterGuru (50986) writes: When I visited a friend in Czechoslovakia in 1985, he had just installed a very expensive ( for him ) satellite dish so he could watch West German TV. Now the Internet makes it easy to watch and participate. Even with heavy censorship closed societies can no longer control the ongoing discourse. Closed society can mean anything from China to various "self contained" religious groups. + * Thanks ICANN (Score:1) by Anonymous Coward writes: Thank you ICANN for contributing towards this mess, with your self-serving policy of continually releasing new TLDs - most recently the generic TLD. What purpose does this rubbish serve, apart from making ICANN more wealthy? Other big countries see it as the US making an easy grab for money based on their control of the internet, even if barely any US citizens benefit from the countless TLDs that have now been released. If the USA doesn't want their stewardship of the internet repeatedly challenged by foreign + * Reading between the lines a bit... (Score:2) by Jawnn (445279) writes: FTFA... Their proposal has been withdrawn without explanation, an ITU spokesperson confirmed. I'd guess that they've decided to sub it out to the major U.S. telco's, who will perform any act or service for the right price, no questions asked. + * Ultra Vires (Score:1) by Occams (2422082) writes: Providing links to torrent sites, which is all Pirate Bay does, is not copyright violation. The US copyright lobby is totally out of control, having people extradited for breaking US laws, even when they are not in US jurisdiction and have broken no laws that apply where they live and when they did what they are accused of doing. The USA would not tolerate that being done to its own citizens for any other trivial offence, other countries should simply tell these US corporates to get fucked. + * A technical standard rfor censorship is good (Score:1) by Occams (2422082) writes: The ITU is about telecom standards that provide for compatibility of communications between carriers, and countries. If there were to be a technical standard for censoring the internet, then the ITU would necessarily be involved. The nature of the ITU working methods is that any member country could make such a proposal. That proposal would be studied for worthiness for ITU resources and for technical merit, and other proposals may be made for doing things differently. The outcome would be a world standa + * + + Re: (Score:2) by Cenan (1892902) writes: If you're gonna spam random internet forums, at least double check your google translate so you don't come off like a complete moron. o + o + 1 reply beneath your current threshold. * 4 replies beneath your current threshold. * There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead. Related Links Top of the: day, week, month. * 1862 comments3D Printable Ammo Clip Skirts New Proposed Gun Laws * 1435 commentsNewspaper That Published Gun-Owners List Hires Armed Guards * 1388 commentsSmart Guns To Stop Mass Killings * 1232 commentsNew York Paper Uses Public Records To Publish Gun-Owner Map * 899 commentsNew York Pistol Permit Owner List Leaked next Science Behavior of Birds Depends On Their Hatching Order 67 comments previous Earth Draft of IPCC 2013 Report Already Circulating 306 comments Slashdot (BUTTON) Archived Discussion Moderate Moderator Help Delete * Get more comments * 100 of 115 loaded * Submit Story Fraud is the homage that force pays to reason. -- Charles Curtis, "A Commonplace Book" * FAQ * Story Archive * Hall of Fame * Advertising * Jobs * Terms * Privacy * Cookies/Opt Out * About * Feedback * Slashdot Japan Trademarks property of their respective owners. Comments owned by the poster. Copyright (c) 2013 Slashdot. All Rights Reserved. Slashdot is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company Close Slashdot comScore2 Working...