#The Battle of Tours - Atom The Battle of Tours - RSS The Battle of Tours - Atom IFRAME: http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=2835733450638808855&blogNa me=The+Battle+of+Tours&publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&navbarType=LIG HT&layoutType=LAYOUTS&searchRoot=http://thebattleoftours.blogspot.com/s earch&blogLocale=en_GB&homepageUrl=http://thebattleoftours.blogspot.com /&targetPostID=2524865363318806206&vt=6387839290571905192 The Battle of Tours The Battle of Today -- a Blog from Hong Kong * Why the Battle of Tours * Islam in figures * Library * The Case against Islam Monday, 13 June 2011 Arab Spring or Arab Autumn? There are two types of people in the world: those that divide the world into two and those that don’t. Mostly we do, of course. For “one divides into two” is the natural order of things. As Mao said 一分为二 (yi fen wei er), ‘one divides into two” is the Hegelian dialectic and "holds ever true".[*] And so there are two main views on the post-Tunisian uprisings in the Arab world. The optimists vs the pessimists; the glass half full vs the glass half empty; the idealists vs the realists. The naïve vs the sophisticated? The half-full-optimist-naïve-idealists seem to have carried the day at least in terminology: the “Arab Spring”. But why not the Arab Autumn? It doesn’t have the same ring, I admit, but it’s more likely the more apt metaphor. (Daniel Pipes has another reason for not liking the word “Spring”, which he calls a “misnomer”). I’ve been in the latter category from the outset: the realist-pessimist category. The lurking Brotherhood has always been my worry and it’s now coming out of the woodwork. Those idealist/optimists – the likes of the awful dhimmi Roger Cohen and his cohorts – downplayed the Brotherhood all along. If they’d heard of it – and many clearly hadn’t – they said it was changing its spots, was becoming – indeed was, to the dummy head of national security Tom Donilon – secular. The Brotherhood was a pussy; don’t worry about it. Or, as last resort, it was “nuanced”, that favourite appellation of the postmodern left, liberally applied when confronted with something vaguely distasteful, but which they don’t want to acknowledge. Now they can’t dismiss it. But still they prevaricate, these professional optimists: Hilary Clinton to Jeffrey Goldberg in the June issue of The Atlantic, “we don’t know enough yet to understand exactly what they’re morphing into. For me the jury is out.” But they’re not “morphing into” anything. They are what they are. And if they have internal squabbles, they will resolve them by recourse to the basic doctrine. A characteristic of Islamists is that when in doubt they go back to their core documents. That’s precicely why we have a resurgence of Islamic militancy: it’s the result of hewing closer to Islam’s core documents. And for the Brotherhood, that means recourse to its creed: Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Koran is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest purpose. How scary is all that? Pretty, to me. Not nuanced at all, I’d say. So that’s why I – and most other bloggerati in the Jihad-critical front – are convinced that these roilings in the Arab world can’t turn out well. They will be controlled by the Brotherhood in its various guises. That’s more Islam, more Islamism, more anti-western paranoia, more intolerance – of Christians, Jews, all non-Muslims, of women, of gays – more hatred for Israel (probably more war for Israel). The whole bag. Already the Brotherhood in Egypt has upped the ante and said that it will field candidates in more than 50% of the seats in September, up from the 30% to which it was earlier committed. In Jordan the Brotherhood is called the Islamic Action Front and is already warning the government of retributions to come when they’re in power. In Tunisia the Brotherhood is Ennahda, already making women wear the hijab, threatening secular academics and saying that the revolution has “released the power of Islam”. Oh, great. I was pessimistic from the beginning of these revolutions, because I’d read about the Brotherhood and knew them to be skilled at taking power in vacuums. And knew what a venal lot they are and that they will not be good for us in whatever guise, however “nuanced” they are. Professor Timur Kuran of Duke University, gives a more detailed (“nuanced”?) picture of why there are vacuums in these Arab societies and why it is that the Brotherhood can make gains from them. These societies lack any civil structures. That’s the key to it all. And the reason there are no civil structures, as Kuran makes clear, is the fault of Islam itself. And the reason the Brotherhood can make gains is that they’re the only ones organised. They’re the only ones who have kept the mission since their formation in the twenties (see above), the only ones who have weathered being oppressed, used to working in secret, used to holding membership in torrid times; so that when they are legal again, as they now are, they can sprout like weeds in the summer rains. Well done for speaking the truth on this prof! And well done (for a change) to the Tribune, (aka the overseas edition of The New York Times) for carrying professor Kuran's analysis. Kuran, by they way, is sound on these issues and I have mentioned him before in relation to Sharia finance, where he is one of the few Muslims critical of it because of its backwardness and inefficiency. Good on you Tim! ******** [*] The Chinese leaders got its collective political knickers in a twist over this "one divides into two" biusiness, in the mid sixties. There was a "one divides into two controversy", with one faction for the motion and another faction against, maintaining instead that "two combine into one" (合二而一. He er er yi), and not only that it could. but that it must. Swiftian shades? Pointy eggs vs round eggs? Well, it was deadly serious political warfare by metaphor, and people died on both sides, is how serious it was. Still, two factions, note.... I happened to arrive in Peking to study Chinese when the controversy was still part of the background noise. Indeed, the phrase was -- surreally -- one of the first I learned, as I was shown round the campus by a sweet young girl in the Mao suit, hair in twin braids. "Why is the college here", I asked, as it was far away from the city. "Oh", she said, "one divides into two". References: MarxistPhilosophy.org: The One divides into two controversy. Geoffrey Goldberg. “Danger: Falling Tyrants”. The Atlantic, June 2011. Timur Kuran. “The weak foundations of Arab democracy”. IHT, May 28, 2011 Caroline Glick: “The real Egyptian Revolution”. June 3, 2011. Battle of Tours Blog: The Muslim Brotherhood. Print Friendly and PDF Posted by Peter at 16:30 Labels: IHT, Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood Newer Post Older Post Home Follow this blog by Email ____________________ Submit fu.saisee@gmail.com Search This Blog Loading... Online References * The Koran * The Hadith The Koran The Koran Dawood's is a good translation Hadith Hadith Reliable stories of Muhammad Sirah Sirah The official biography Sharia Law Sharia Law Manual of Islamic Jurisprudence Labels * Abbas (3) * ACT (1) * Age (1) * apostates (11) * Australia (41) * BBC (21) * Bible (1) * Blasphemy (5) * Bloomberg (10) * bomb (4) * Brooks (2) * Burka (14) * China (53) * Chinglish (2) * Christianity (9) * Confucius (1) * diet (1) * Drugs (3) * Eclipse (1) * Economist (2) * economy (13) * EDL (3) * Electric bikes (4) * Finance (15) * Food (5) * Foreigners (1) * Free Speech (25) * Global Warming (35) * golf (2) * Hamas (6) * Hirsi Ali (4) * Hong Kong (38) * Human Rights (3) * IHT (57) * Immigration (9) * Islam (142) * Islamisation (7) * Islamophobia (17) * Israel (59) * Japan (2) * Jerusalem (4) * Jews (11) * Jihad (14) * Koran (4) * Krugman (2) * Language (2) * LEAP (4) * Letter (61) * Markets (2) * media (4) * Middle East (73) * Minarets (8) * miscellanea (83) * Moderate Muslims (46) * Mosques (3) * Muhammad (7) * Muslim Brotherhood (27) * myths (13) * Nick Sherry (5) * Nidal (5) * North Korea (4) * Nuclear (4) * NYC (23) * Obama (16) * One law for all (20) * optimist (1) * Pakistan (5) * Pat Condell (1) * PC (61) * pessimist (1) * Polls (17) * Profiling (14) * Reform of Islam (2) * Rio Tinto (1) * S and P (1) * Saudi (1) * SCMP (53) * Shanghai (2) * Shariah (82) * Steyn (3) * Switzerland (7) * TED (5) * terrorism (73) * Torture (1) * Turkey (4) * UK (26) * United States (20) * Zakat (1) * Zakir Naik (1) Blog Archive * ► 2012 (30) + ► February (7) o Do I think this is a good post? No. o Homeland Security's Double-deal duplicity o Morgan Freeman: the Easy Reader o "The Third Jihad": see it for yourself and make yo... o Mark Steyn should stick to his knitting o One country, two cisterns o Schettino, "the careless one", steers Costa Concor... + ► January (23) o Kos Kommenters are also ageing hippies o Canadian Honour Killing conviction: interview with... o "Geert Wilders Says There's No Such Thing as Moder... o "Ban the Burqa" o Muslima (?) and Child (II) o Am I too soft on China? o My critique of Eric Allen Bell's article o My critique of the Daily Kos' Kommentors o The Bell tolls, it tolls for thee.. and thee heed ... o Good to see REAL hate crimes being prosecuted... o DO ask for whom Eric Bell tolls... o Plump Prince: Pouff! or Prevail? o The Islamic Trilogy o Islam in Norway o The intolerance of diversity o Islam in America o "Muslim Brotherhood Declares 'Mastership of the Wo... o "Andelusia Spring", reclaiming "occupied" Spain fo... o "Jihadist group declares war on France for being '... o "... our way of life is not up for grabs, our laws... o Muslim Brotherhood Organizations In America: Goals... o Muslim moderation: Mission impossible? o Invisible gorillas: the Muslim Brotherhood in Egyp... * ▼ 2011 (275) + ► December (20) o "Radical Islam and the Holocaust" o "Europe's Inexorable March Towards Islam" o "Jihad" means war in the name of Islam.... and the... o Islamapologist sites are pusillanimous pissants o "Was the Arab Spring a Victory for Extremism?": Je... o We were there! o Regulate Marihuana Like Wine o On Gingrich and the Palestinians o "Second period of Islamic power" o North Korean People's Army Funky Get Down Juche Pa... o Muslima (?) and Child o Long Live the Hitch! o "Off with long beards and Muslim Veil" o "Criticism of Islam could soon be a crime in Ameri... o Roger Cohen: "Come home to Israel".... should real... o The Muslim Brotherhood is "moderate... non-discrim... o The Arab "Spring": how 'naive' do you have to be, ... o "Reducing attacks is Israel's aim" o With friends like these... the pseudo "ally" Pakis... o "A pinkwash? Hogwash" + ► November (19) + ► October (10) + ► September (4) + ► August (31) + ► July (27) + ▼ June (39) o BBC World Service Report on US domestic terrorism:... o Google alerts -- Islam (iv) o Google alerts -- Islam (iii) o "Face of bigotry" o Google alerts -- Islam (ii) o "Plans to curb influence of sharia courts unveiled... o Google alerts -- Islam o "Name the poison". Condell on women's rights in I... o Lest we forget the Battle of Tours o Liveblogging Ian Plimer in Hong Kong o Good on'yer Geert! o End Federal Marijuana Prohibition o One Law for all: debate on practice of sharia law ... o Jews did not steal Palestine o Mark Steyn on free speech at the IPA o Will Turkey pull through? o "Studying Islam has made me an atheist" o "How Palestinians became the baby seals of the Wes... o Sharia law is not like Jewish religious law o How to handle the media on Israel-Palestine o "Christians are more militant than Muslims, says G... o I never knew it was so easy! Friedman on his new ... o "Who do these male bloggers think they are?" Well... o "The Roots of racism" o The Dalai Lama announces he's a marxist: my views o Bearded Bruins win Cup. What's wrong with that? o English Defence League is a Human Rights organisat... o English Defence League is a Human Rights organisat... o English Defence League is a Human Rights organisat... o English Defence League is a Human Rights organisat... o Terrorism works o The dodgy UN Human Rights commission has the gall.... o Arab Spring or Arab Autumn? o Organic farm kills o "Interesting Times" and "oriental obliquity" o Band of Brothers. The ISPU is a Muslim Brotherhoo... o Mosques in the US really DO promote hate ideology o "Geo-engineering can help save the planet" by Thom... o "From Abbotabad to worse", Hitchens on US-Pakistan... + ► May (41) + ► April (7) + ► March (18) + ► February (22) + ► January (37) * ► 2010 (235) + ► December (17) + ► November (24) + ► October (20) + ► September (16) + ► August (28) + ► July (16) + ► June (24) + ► May (20) + ► April (12) + ► March (11) + ► February (18) + ► January (29) * ► 2009 (98) + ► December (19) + ► November (13) + ► October (10) + ► September (14) + ► August (27) + ► July (15) "...it is the duty of those who have accepted Islam to strive unceasingly to convert or subjugate those who have not. This obligation is without limit of time or space. It must continue until the whole world has either accepted the Islamic faith or submitted to the power of the Islamic state." -- Bernard Lewis, renowned historian of Islam and the Middle East, in The Political Language of Islam, p72-3. In other words: "Islam is unique among religions of the world in having a developed doctrine, theology and legal system that mandates warfare against unbelievers." -- Robert Spencer, Author and scholar of Islam, 2006 Socrates Quotes IFRAME: sidebar-gadget1 Picture Window template. Powered by Blogger.