#Step Two Designs Posts RSS feed Step Two Designs » Sources of CMS uncertainty Comments Feed Step Two Designs Information Architecture Essentials Dynamic or batch publishing? Choosing an intranet project sponsor Step Two Designs Beyond The Idea ____________________ Search Skip to content * Home * Blog * Our services * Books & reports * Intranets2011 * Events * About us * Contact Us Home > articles > content management > Sources of CMS uncertainty CMb 2004-01 Sources of CMS uncertainty Written by James Robertson, published January 12th, 2004 Categorised under: articles, content management Not all aspects of a content management system (CMS) project are equally easy. While some elements can be installed ‘out of the box’, others have proved difficult to implement. The greatest source of project risk is uncertainty, generated from a number of sources, such as a limited understanding of business requirements, variable product capabilities, or a poor track record of implementation. In the context of limited budgets and timetables, organisations must identify the most uncertain aspects of a CMS project, and concentrate management efforts on them. This makes the most effective use of available resources, reduces project risks, and maximises overall outcomes. The starting point for improving the management of CMS projects is to recognise the sources of uncertainty, and how these affect project outcomes. Future articles will then explore how best to manage these uncertainties. Sources of uncertainty Common sources of CMS uncertainty include: Difficulty in determining concrete business requirements It may be difficult to determine the detailed business requirements for specific CMS functionality within the scope of the evaluation process. This is often an issue when there are strong time constraints on the requirements gathering or selection process. Example: the need for ‘content reuse’ can often be difficult to discern in detail during a rapid requirements-gathering process. Unknown future business directions Insufficient information may be known about the strategic directions of the organisations to be confident that the CMS will meet future needs. This is a key issue in organisations that are undergoing rapid change or innovation. Example: the future need for e-commerce on the website might be related to a review of business activities that will not be completed until after the CMS has been selected. Widespread implementation difficulties Some aspects of content management systems have proved difficult to successfully implement in past projects, due to a range of reasons (only some of which may be technical in nature). Example: workflow is often stated as a primary reason for obtaining a content management system, yet many organisations are now ‘unrolling’ it due to failed deployments. Highly-variable product capabilities There is a large degree of variation between vendors in how specific features and capabilities have been implemented. With each approach having a unique mix of strengths and weaknesses, this can be a major cause of uncertainty during implementation. Example: many organisations need to integrate existing web-based applications into the CMS, so that a consistent page layout and formatting is applied across an entire site. Vendors, however, have tackled this issue using many different approaches, and not all will match the specific needs of the organisation. Complexity of requirements or implementation Some features and aspects of a content management system are very complex to identify or implement, and will remain so for the foreseeable future regardless of product upgrades. Example: integrating with other business systems is rarely simple or easy. People issues Content management is not a technology issue. While a content management system is typically deployed as part of the project, there are many supporting activities that have an equal (or greater) impact upon project success. Managing these ‘people issues’ introduces complexity into CMS projects, and broadens their scope. Example: decentralised authoring requires the active participation of authors to be successful. For a range of reasons, this has proved challenging in many projects, and is not always successful. (For further information regarding the evaluation and selection of a CMS, download the Content Management Requirements Toolkit.) Tags: content management systems, evaluation, selection, uncertainty Post a Comment Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked * Name * ______________________________ Email * ______________________________ Website ______________________________ Comment _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Post Comment [_] Notify me of followup comments via e-mail * Download this article Printable versionSize: 68.14 Kb * About the author James Robertson James Robertson is the founder and Managing Director of Step Two Designs, a vendor-neutral consultancy located in Australia. James is recognised as one of the world-wide thought leaders on the topics of web content management and intranet strategy. He has worked with many organisations in both the public and private sectors, including Fortune 500 companies and Federal Government agencies. If you have any comments on this article, please send them to: jamesr@steptwo.com.au Related papers + Who is choosing the new CMS? + Using scenarios to select a CMS + Requirements-focused CMS selection + Understanding the CMS marketplace + Open-source content management systems + Top 10 mistakes when selecting a CMS + Choosing the right CMS authoring tools + CMS vendors are evaluating us Syndicate this article? There are a range of options for republishing our articles, either online or offline. Find out more RSS feeds RSS Feed of all articles All articles Announce list Find out when new papers are announced by joining our monthly email announce list. For questions or comments please contact the Webmaster. Copyright 2008, Step Two Designs Pty Ltd, ABN 99 081 019 623. All rights reserved.Intranet Peers and Intranet Roadmap are trademarks of Step Two Designs.