The University of Chicago :: Theories of Media :: Keywords Glossary :: symbol-index-icon Johansen, Jorgen Dines (1988). "The Distinction between Icon, Index, and Symbol in the Study of Literature," Semiotic Theory and Practice, Notes symbol, index, icon Created by American polymath Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the symbol/index/icon triad remains a tool of analysis at the core of semiotics, a discipline which studies signs and their meanings. As communication (including the non-deliberate and the non-human), symbol/index/icon analysis is now used throughout many disciplines. Peirce (pronounced purse) originally developed the symbol/index/icon triad as one component in a massively complex formal system of (Johansen 2002, 5). Of Peirce's many ways of distinguishing signs, the symbol/index/icon triad focuses on the relations of signs to their objects: symbols have a convention-based relationships with their influenced by their objects (e.g. a weathervane or a thermometer); and icons have specific properties in common with their objects (e.g. portraits, diagrams) (Johansen 2002, 51). Even at this basic level, photograph: it has properties in common with its object, and is therefore an icon; it is directly and physically influenced by its object, and is therefore an index; and lastly it requires a learned As each term is considered in greater detail, keep in mind that as a completly abstract system, the symbol/index/icon triad applies equally to any and all media or form of communication, prefering none over computer keyboard is a symbol, as are those things not specifically alphabetic or numeric: $, %, &, #, @, etc. Unlike indices or icons, the symbols are not signs without an interpreter or "reader." Originally called "likenesses" by Peirce, icons have a "topological similarity" to their object (Sebok 28). Classical paintings and similarity" to their object (Sebok 28). Classical paintings and photographs are obviously icons, as they visually resemble their objects. This resemblance need not be tangible: "every algebraical objects. This resemblance need not be tangible: "every algebraical equation is an icon, in so far as it exhibits, by means of the algebraical signs (which are not themselves icons), the relations of equation is an icon, in so far as it exhibits, by means of the algebraical signs (which are not themselves icons), the relations of the quantities concerned" (Peirce 107). Along these lines, Peirce the quantities concerned" (Peirce 107). Along these lines, Peirce creates three subcategories of icon: image, metaphor and diagram. Images share "simple qualities" or "sensory qualities" with their broader: the thermometer previously described as index can also be described as metaphoric icon: there is a parallelism in the translation of heat into an increased volume of the mercury column. While symbols required interpretants and indices required their objects, icons have no such requirements. Peirce uses the example of a Euclidian diagram: streaks of pencil lead can represent a geometric Under a Peircian analysis, the visual aid itself is not dyadic, but triadic. The tree is an icon, "arbor" is a symbol, and everything else (the oval, the arrows, the midline) are indices which direct the Peirce's overall semiotic approach. Beyond the examples already provided, Peirce interpreted the symbol/index/icon triad through many other analytic triads. These interpretations and comparisons are not as they appear frequently in Peircian literature. A few examples, with terms ordered to express congruencies to symbol/index/icon: the legisign/sinsign/qualisign triad organizes signs by relation to their concepts abstracted away from all media. Not coincidentally, Peirce viewed the symbol/index/icon triad as "the most fundamental division of signs," and the majority of semioticians continue to agree The University of Chicago :: Theories of Media :: Keywords Glossary :: symbol-index-icon