e used in the broad |sense| of "the study of th
posed to the narrow |sense|, "the study of the 
sary" in the strict |sense|, it merely adds som
onnotations" (122), |meaning| that literature has
ogical study of the |meaning| of the adjective. T
ish between literal |meaning| and metaphorical me
ng and metaphorical |meaning|, between denotation
at heimlich has two |meanings|. The first sense is
meanings. The first |sense| is the most literal
ntimate. The second |meaning| departs from the po
e positive, literal |sense| to the more negativ
gative metaphorical |sense| of hidden, secret, 
ce: in the positive |sense|, heimlich takes the
me. In the negative |sense|, by contrast, the w
.
Unheimlich in the |sense| of strange, unfamil
n of only the first |meaning| of heimlich and as 
he second, negative |meaning| of heimlich. This p
ing to pin down the |meaning| of the uncanny, Fre
 manage to convey a |sense| of the uncanny, not
c ideal of univocal |meaning|, for the opposition
tence of ambivalent |meanings| in their own right,
 fore. That is, the |sense| of metaphoricity an
 and the process of |signification| is perceived as amb
rged with a certain |meaning|. Therefore, it is i
 in the traditional |sense| of a self-contained
 of the Creation of |Meaning| in language. London
ishes to retain the |sense|, the real, the real
 the reality of the |sense| of things. He thus 
eeks out "the basic |sense|". Thus the analysis