+ Website Info

Opinion: âTraditionalâ America not wanted

   by Preston Peeden, Associate Editor
--
   I understand that he's not only coming from a news station riddled with biases, but also that as a cable news "anchor," he and his show exist to gain viewers so as to stay on air. But following the presidential election, O'Reilly topped himself in the category of ridiculously insensitive statements.

   While discussing the reasons for Obama's victory (something that FOX News tried their best to resent as unfathomable), O'Reilly lamented the "white establishment's" new role as the "minority." O'Reilly went a step further by saying that "the demographics are changing," and that "it's not a traditional America anymore."

   When I heard this, I couldn't help but think that he was joking (I also couldn't help but wonder why I was watching FOX News). In thirty seconds, O'Reilly had not only racially qualified our nation's make-up, but also implied that, ultimately, Obama won the election not because he was the best candidate or because more Americans agreed with his view of this nation's future, but rather because simply there are less white people in this country. In O'Reilly's mind (in the context of this statement), the presence of more minority voters was not only a bad thing, but that it also undermined the "white establishment."

   O'Reilly's comment illustrated a long-standing fallacy in American perception, that being that there is a "traditional America," and that if there is such a thing, then it's an idea that we would really want to return to.

   For so long, Americans have called themselves members of a "Great Cultural Melting Pot," a place where all cultures are accepted and brought into the process of building a national identity that bears the markers of all those that constitute it. On the surface, this seems like an alright idea. But ultimately, this process of Americanization creates an ethnocentric worldview where a certain idea of what an American is and how an American acts becomes the norm, and in that way those that don't fit this view must try to conform to it. Americans look back at the early 20th century and view the influx of immigrants as a positive marker, but in doing so, people ignore the groups that weren't included (Asians, Eastern Europeans, etc.). If America had ever been a melting pot, why were their immigration quotas based on race and ethnicity for decades that existed unmolested for decades?

   If America isn't "traditionally" an accepting and all-inclusive nation, then what is it? Looking back solely at the Founding Fathers as a model for traditionalism, then our government and our nation exist to promulgate the rights of rich, slave-holding white men. Is that the "traditional America" that O'Reilly wants? Because if so, then essentially our voting population shrinks to only the top one percent. Our nation says that it was founded on principles of equality and liberty, but ultimately we were founded on those principles for a select few; for the rest, their stations didn't improve for over a century. "Traditionally" our nation is exclusivist. "Traditionally" our nation was founded on giving rights to some and keeping rights away from others.

   When O'Reilly spoke about a traditional American demographic, I hope he didn't mean what those words actually imply. If there is any traditional version of being an American, then that version is one that excludes others based on sex, race and ethnicity.

   Our nation likes to act like we're traditionally inclusive, but unfortunately it's the opposite. We have created a version of history in which we aren't the bad guy, because that view is convenient, but in reality, a "traditional America" is not something any of us should want based off of the values that we say and believe our country espouses.

   I believe in racial and sexual equality. I believe in America, but unlike O'Reilly, I don't believe in a "traditional America." I believe in the actual America. I believe in our changing society, and I value it.

   — Preston Peeden is a senior in history. He can be reached at ppeeden@utk.edu.